I thought bankers played billiards.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote![]()
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 24,151 to 24,180 of 45185
-
25-04-2014 01:48 PM #24151
-
25-04-2014 01:53 PM #24152This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2014 02:38 PM #24153This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2014 02:48 PM #24154
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 2,701
The review states that they're planning to raise capital, increase income, reduce spending and put out the best football team they can. That didn't need 120 hours to write, far less 120 days.
What's the additional capital going to be used for? They have the short-term loans already taken out to repay. There's likely to be a trading loss and one-off costs to cover next season. An undisclosed amount will be spent on upgrading Ibrox. A scouting and player development program is to be set up. How much will there be available to spend on strengthening the playing squad to the level they aspire to compete at? If they're planning to raise the capital by share issues a lot more detail of numbers will need to be made available. A repeat of the IPO prospectus (WATP - Stand and Deliver) won't impress institutional investors who've seen the value of their shares fall by two thirds.
The talk is of raising between Ģ20 and Ģ30 million in capital over the next three years. I'd have thought that after a full business review they'd have a more precise figure in mind, but what do I know. Whichever it is, that will take the total invested over Ģ50 million. To justify that, a dividend of a significant number of millions each year should start being paid out sooner rather than later if Laxey and other institutions are to get the profits they must have expected when they got into the business.
The whole plan seems to depend on getting far enough in European competitions to allow profits to be made. I suppose it might work. I'd love to see the more detailed financial projections Wallace must have done. The public document tells us next to nothing.
-
25-04-2014 04:35 PM #24155This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2014 04:45 PM #24156
To have your debts wiped, start again as a new club at the erse of scottish football with 40k crowds and be back in a similar position 2 years later! Is an effin disgrace and worth a withdrawal of spfa membership imo.
Im sure they would be in debt all over again, if there credit wasnt so fkd upLast edited by seanshow; 25-04-2014 at 04:47 PM.
-
25-04-2014 04:48 PM #24157This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Madness is repeating the same behaviour and expecting a different result. It doesn't take Einstein to see the flaws in their plan.
-
25-04-2014 05:30 PM #24158
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 2,710
Ģ70 Mill s*****d. Where have I heard that before?...............
-
25-04-2014 06:19 PM #24159
Surely they can't think supporters are this gullible.........these quoted section and particularly the highlighted bits are hardly going to to fill fans with confidence...
Though season ticket renewals are crucial to Rangers' financial position, the facility for fans to pay for them with credit or debit cards has been removed and supporters are instead being asked to pay the club directly.
Rangers say this has come as a consequence of the merchant acquirer's stance that it would need "extensive security" over property assets.
One caveat to the new payment arrangement will be that customers' money will not be protected in the event of the business going bust.
"The board believes that one of the major factors influencing the merchant acquirer to change its terms was the extensive negative coverage of calls in some quarters for supporters to refrain or delay purchasing season tickets," Rangers explained.
"As previously stated, the board has no intention of granting security over Ibrox.
Last edited by down-the-slope; 25-04-2014 at 06:22 PM.
-
25-04-2014 06:26 PM #24160
Just wondering why the stadium is on the expenditure list as would this not be green that bought ibrox & car park so are they saying the used fans money/shares to pay that back from Green?
-
25-04-2014 06:39 PM #24161This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This sound to me if they can get the money in a share issue they could be looking so sell ibrox for funds?
-
25-04-2014 06:56 PM #24162
Just checked the share price for the first time in a couple of weeks, to find it's dropped to its lowest ever of 22p
Highly pleasing. Huge losses for the knuckledraggers who bought into Charlie's dream
-
25-04-2014 07:14 PM #24163This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Clearly that hasn't happened and everyone knows they have been mismanaged again and bought there way back up making this situation almost inevitable .The Hierarchy want to turn a blind eye as they are Desparate to get them back into the top league .The whole thing stinks .Again this has had more coverage in last two days than most of the Hearts saga over past year .
Surely there need to be more financialProbity and more Transparency in thier case But they get away with it and have a Temerity to still refuse to speak to BBC because of the way they were treated ,and criticise other clubs over issues .
They are getting away with too Mutch in my view and it's as if because of what happened first time round they are untouchable now and do thier own thing .
I can honestly say I haven't missed them one bit .
Will be interesting how this all plays out .
-
25-04-2014 07:38 PM #24164This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I am not sure that the football authorities could have done anything. Club gets money, club spends money, club gets into financial difficulties. Club has to deal with it.
I can't see that they are "getting away with" anything. If the club goes into administration, there are sanctions. More importantly, there will be serious commercial and legal consequences which will hurt them much more than a 25 point deduction.
-
-
25-04-2014 08:57 PM #24166This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It also doesn't put Scottish football in a good light when all we hear about is these on going financial difficulties at Sevco which to my mind could and should of been avoided.
-
25-04-2014 09:18 PM #24167
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 1,137
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote)? It doesn't look like they will sell enough season tickets and another share issue looks like it would probably fail. I know very little about this stuff but the vultures seem to be circling around the idiots left holding the ticking bombing while Charlie and his gang have made good their escape with lots of loot (mixing metaphors a bit there but you know what I mean)
-
25-04-2014 09:51 PM #24168This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I have no sense of anything at the moment, other than impending disaster if drastic action isn't taken. If I were advising them (collectively), I'd be telling them to get round a table and find a compromise. However, there seem to be so many egos involved that I am not sure that's going to happen. The only way that might happen is if the shareholders (who have lost so much already) force them to do it.
Even a share issue wouldn't necessarily be the answer. That would take time to organise, and they don't seem to have that. No-one would fund them in the short-term, at least not at sensible rates, and (as you say) there is no guarantee that it would succeed..... unless Mr. King chose to underwrite it. That may be his strategy.
Administration? It may be a good thing in the longer-term. It wouldn't be a cheap option for a new owner, unlike the Sevco fiasco. But, with a 25 point penalty in the Championship, it might force the new owners to be more realistic in their plans and get back to sustainable trading. That may also be King's plan.
Charlie Greene must be giggling away. All the predictions of asset-stripping that came from fans of Sheffield United (?) have come to pass. Ann Budge will also be looking at things with a keen interest.... I can't see her trying the same nonsense.
-
25-04-2014 09:54 PM #24169
football is a joke. Fifa uefa have done nothing to combat fairness in football. first class flights champagne and nibbles all round. the rest who cares. viva la revolution
-
25-04-2014 11:17 PM #24170
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,515
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Have a look at the highlights of their midweek match against Ayr and you will see that that Ibrox was empty; 10k at most. And their winning goal was so far offside that Craig Thomson would not even have given it against us.
-
25-04-2014 11:17 PM #24171This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-04-2014 05:57 AM #24172
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Milton Keynes
- Posts
- 1,985
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-04-2014 06:05 AM #24173This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I do not recall any statements from Rangers admitting they had made mistakes and showing contrition. All we got was bluster, aggression, paranoia and if blame was to be allocated then it fell at the door of specific, rogue individuals rather than any systemic problems within the club.
If there is a refusal to acknowledge that mistakes were made it seems to me that there can be no surprise that the mistakes are repeated.
Not sure what the football authorities could have done to prevent this.
-
26-04-2014 08:45 AM #24174
Sevco fans have to pay cash for their season tickets now. No credit card payments accepted.
"We are the Pay Pal"
-
26-04-2014 08:47 AM #24175This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hahahaha quality !!
-
26-04-2014 09:11 AM #24176This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-04-2014 12:19 PM #24177This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Also saw 'the 128 days later review' . Made me laugh
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk
-
26-04-2014 12:54 PM #24178
Simply glorious.
http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/inde...owtopic=233168
Personal favourites:
Never noticed this one. I liked this one.
We're going to enjoy this journey, we'll make a lot of friends along that route I'm sure while our former friends have the difficulties that they are going to face, Rangers and it's fans will have an enjoyable few years. [Charles Green, July 2012]
Great stuff, Ive been thinking the same. It will be good for Rangers & Rangers fans to get get out of that cess-pit of bigotry & hatred for a while and cleanse ourselves away from all those ****ing ********s. Let the good times begin. And of course theres always the fun ahead of watching some of those *******s die along the way, all in the name of sporting integrity of course.I have a funny feeling we shall grow to love mr green and will all be gutted when he leaves. It wouldn't surprise me though if he falls in love with rangers like most who have anything to do with our club do
-
26-04-2014 08:51 PM #24179
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/f...-makes-3459551
Wallace’s review didn’t tell fans much they didn’t already know in terms of the mismanagement of the previous regime, even if seeing the eye-watering figure of Ģ67.2million which has been spent in less than two years merely added to their disgust.
Excessive wages for players for the division they were in was something that was pretty clear to most and they didn’t need to see it in black and white. Throw in the “onerous” commercial deals.
that's an awful lot of money spent to secure winning the leagues two and one
-
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks