This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hearts do.
View Poll Results: What's your preferred outcome from the financial problems over at Yam land?
- Voters
- 1526. You may not vote on this poll
Results 43,321 to 43,350 of 47452
-
02-04-2014 07:39 PM #43321
-
02-04-2014 07:40 PM #43322This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 07:41 PM #43323
[QUOTE=CropleyWasGod;3954014]
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 07:41 PM #43324This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 07:41 PM #43325This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They have a security on it of £6.8m.
They do own it, though.
-
02-04-2014 07:44 PM #43326
[QUOTE=BarneyK;3954040]
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It hasn't been reported in the Scottish MSM, only Bloomberg AFAIK. Bloomberg... one of THE financial media outlets in the world.
I'm not a fan, as you can tell.
-
02-04-2014 07:51 PM #43327This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
02-04-2014 08:57 PM #43329This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 08:58 PM #43330
Willie Miller & Michael Stewart both talked tonight as if Yams were doomed. Interestingly, in the little I heard neither expressed much sympathy for Yams predicament. Similarly in today's DR 4/4 letter writers basically said GIRFUY to Yams, so much for this love for them from other teams.
-
02-04-2014 09:08 PM #43331
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Posts
- 1,495
Something about recent goings on didn't add up to me i.e. it seems that it's UBIG that's trying to put a spanner in the works yet their 50% holding really is worthless if HMFC are liquidated.
However I hadn't realised that UBIG were actually the majority shareholder in UKIO. So, effectively, their major creditor (Saulius?) is pulling the strings of both UBIG and UKIO. This makes sense of a few comments that have been made that say that the UKIO and UBIG shares have been combined for negotiation purposes.
So, how's this for a scenario:
- UKIO admins provisionally agree the CVA (UBIG abstain)
- Subsequently UBIG admins get it together, the state insurance thing works its way through, and Saulius emerge as the major creditor
- Saulius doesn't fancy the look of the whole cosy CVA arrangement
- Saulius pulls rank on the whole thing as it thinks it can get more for the land on the open market
Does that add up or is the shareholding of UBIG in UKIO irrelevant now that UKIO is being wound up?
-
02-04-2014 09:13 PM #43332
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 2,182
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 09:19 PM #43333This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 09:30 PM #43334This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 09:45 PM #43335
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Posts
- 1,495
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Also, what else can be the explanation for the two shareholdings being combined for negotiation? Or do we not believe that to be true?
-
02-04-2014 09:48 PM #43336This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 10:22 PM #43337This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 10:54 PM #43338
Picked up a yam in my cab tonight and asked him how he had enjoyed the game.
He had indeed enjoyed the game but went on to tell me that he had been in hospitality and had been told stuff that was breaking his heart. Didn't get any more info than that, other than he had all his fingers crossed that something would change and they would be alright on Monday.
I was of course full of sympathy (no one tips a w******).
-
02-04-2014 10:56 PM #43339
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 3,042
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-04-2014 11:59 PM #43340
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- In the future
- Posts
- 658
I think it is safe to assume that no-one on this thread is an expert on Lithuanian company law. I still think it it odd that the question of frozen shares has never been raised directlly with BDO in all the press conjecture. On one hand you could surmise that it is obviously not an issue, on the other, why have BDO not kicked the idea into touch? It remains for me the elephant in the room.
-
03-04-2014 06:25 AM #43341This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The way things are going I think the lack of funds could seal there destiny,
-
03-04-2014 07:10 AM #43342This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
As to how easy or difficult it would be to get the ratification, I doubt if anyone really knows since it would depend on a court hearing but there's no point in BDO making it an issue at this stage since there are serious doubts about whether it will ever get to the stage of applying for ratification.
-
03-04-2014 07:24 AM #43343This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
- We know that both Ukio and UBIG owe substantial amounts to Saulius.
- The 'good' bits of Ukio were transferred to Saulius. That might include a call on the PBS security since land is one of the safest securities you can get and the £6.8m was presumably the market value at the time the security was raised.
- It's possible that Saulius don't hold enough of Ukio's total debt to influence the outcome of a vote, but it seems they do have enough of UBIG's.
- Thus, Saulius would block the sale of UBIG's shares and force liquidation of HoMFC (IA). In doing that they would lose a share of the £50k (or £100k) but gain a share of the correct market value of the PBS - if my second point is correct they'd gain the full £6.8m if it was sold for more than that.
I'm not saying that's how it is but it does seem like a possible scenario to me.
-
03-04-2014 07:30 AM #43344This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-04-2014 07:31 AM #43345
CG I think you are spot on and that is where the game is going unless there is a major U turn on Monday in Lithland.
Personally I do outthink there will be because the Liths know there is every chance the "court will not ratify the transfer" or plug the Micro Wave.
-
03-04-2014 07:44 AM #43346
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 11,181
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
With just days of cash left, I'd be astonished if BDO have misjudged the court ratification process or know that they've almost no chance of getting the shares unfrozen. If that's the case, at this stage, BDO get what they deserve. Yes, they will have done their job, but IMHO they will also have misled Hearts fans by not being open/honest about the court approval hurdle.
-
03-04-2014 07:50 AM #43347This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
shiny gold stars for BDO
-
03-04-2014 07:54 AM #43348
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 11,181
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-04-2014 07:55 AM #43349
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 2,306
C G's take on things makes a lot of sense, if there was no more cash to be had if you believe BDO then why not take it and move on ?, on the other hand if the shares are frozen why not take a punt on selling the land in the future as the only way is up for land prices in the Burgh.
-
03-04-2014 07:56 AM #43350
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 520
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks