If only the people who run Scottish Football had showed the level of courage and integrity that the Olympic Badminton Committee showed with cheats then perhaps we would be celebrating the rebirth of Scottish Football right now instead of its slow death.
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/d...045549702.html
In the Olympics, World Champions, Olympic Champions and favourites for the event get no special treatment but the authorities show that their game is above any of the individuals involved regardless of their perceived status. No fudging the issue, changing the rules or down right corruption and they earn the respect of the sporting world. Furthermore, the Chinese Olympic Authorities come right in behind the Olympic Authorities and demand that their cheating players make a humbling public apology. Everyone is left in no doubt about integrity in the sport, the countries involved and the Olympic Authorities retain the respect of the world even if the individuals concerned must learn a stark and costly lesson.
Sadly we must contrast with the Scottish Football Authorities and the people running Rangers Football Club in Administration. Everything that they have done has been to the detriment of the game here and it may never recover.
The Football Authorities had to be forced in to making a decision and, even then, contrive to work with smoke and mirrors in an attempt to hide the fact that they have not actually punished Rangers Football Club in administration at all. What’s more, they have colluded in promoting a myth that the new club, now trading as The Rangers, is in fact the old club, soon to be liquidated, and all is well with the game.
Finally, throughout the whole process, the arguments for keeping a form of Rangers in the league has consisted of so much negativity about our national sport that it could only be a self fulfilling prophesy. Reagan tells the nutters there will be unrest and now we are told he requires protection from terrorists. Doncaster tells the media world that we cannot do without a Rangers, and opened the door to every sponsor and TV broadcaster inviting them to slash their contribution to this game because he has told them Scottish Football is inferior. Some business tactic that. Instead Reagan had an opportunity to advance the cause of common sense and decency while Doncaster had the most wonderful opportunity to promote our game in Scotland as the cleanest and best in the world to be associated with.
Somebody needs to tell the people running Scottish football that when you are in a dirty hole you need to stop digging. They have made a mess of every stage of this process. I fear that it is already too late but the licence thing is perhaps the last opportunity that they have to show some balls. Even then they have started by making an unconstitutional change to the rules and the fudge gets ever more sickly sweet.
I despair of our game and our society and I am sickened by Scottish Football in its failure to use the influence it has on society and culture in this country to make things better.
Perhaps we should ask the Olympic Badminton people to step in because right now it is Olympic Badminton 8 Scottish Football 0
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 19,561 to 19,590 of 45185
-
02-08-2012 08:55 AM #19561
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,714
Olympic Badminton v Scottish Football
-
02-08-2012 09:17 AM #19562This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-08-2012 09:24 AM #19563
Ridiculous overblown nonsense.
Rangers failed financially, therefore they have to start again at the bottom. That's what has happened. They are being fully punished for deliberate non-payment of tax and will be punished for dual contracts by removing the relevant trophies, if convicted.
Your motivation appears to be a desire to remove Rangers from the face of the earth (vengeance) rather than justice. By your analogy, the badminton players should be prevented from playing ever again. They won't.Last edited by Part/Time Supporter; 02-08-2012 at 09:30 AM.
-
02-08-2012 09:29 AM #19564This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
you are much closer to the reality than most...add to the fact that TV exposure / viewers is part of the calculation of all sponsorship of the league then the potential for reductions in all of those is also there
-
02-08-2012 09:37 AM #19565This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
"Rangers" are starting at the bottom in spite of the efforts of the game's governing bodies to let them off. I think the op makes a good point: we are in no doubt that those whose job it is to protect the integrity of olympic badminton acted quickly and properly when they were called upon to do so. Can we say the same of the football authorities in Scotland?
-
02-08-2012 09:45 AM #19566
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,714
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sadly Rangers Football Club no longer exists (or will no longer exisit after the liquidators are in place) and nowhere do I suggest that the disqualified players should never play again. In fact, my inference is that, by acting quickly and decisively, the Olympic Authorities have probably ensured that they can compete again with their credibility intact. This is something the Scottish Football Authorities failed to do with Rangers FC.
IMHO no punishment should be applied to the company emerging as The Rangers, they should simply have been allowed to work their way in to Scottish football within the rules and, as I have stated in previous posts, The Rangers will become anything their supporters wish them to become. My issue is with the failure of the Scottish Football authorities to act decisively and fairly within the rules and also the present Scottish Football in the best possible light.
Your own post is therefore ill-considered, ridiculous, overblown nonsense but that is only my opinionLast edited by CentreLine; 02-08-2012 at 10:09 AM.
-
02-08-2012 10:05 AM #19567This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-08-2012 10:10 AM #19568
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,714
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteI have added "(or will no longer exisit after the liquidators are in place)"
Many thanks
-
02-08-2012 10:25 AM #19569
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- In the west travelling east.
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 10,613
- Blog Entries
- 1
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-08-2012 10:26 AM #19570This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-08-2012 10:33 AM #19571This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-08-2012 10:59 AM #19572
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,714
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-08-2012 11:10 AM #19573This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by Part/Time Supporter; 02-08-2012 at 12:14 PM.
-
02-08-2012 11:50 AM #19574
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 1,086
Would it surprise anyone of Johnston votes with Celtic to keep the tv rights the same for when his beloved get back to the top?
-
02-08-2012 03:20 PM #19575
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,714
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quoteand I think we are going to have to agree to differ
-
02-08-2012 03:28 PM #19576This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
02-08-2012 05:04 PM #19577
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 1,086
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I do have a suspicion though that if it's not done and dusted early in the season, even if it starts next season, then those nearer the top end might vote to keep it the same.
-
02-08-2012 07:01 PM #19578This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
However they would only be able to play outside the SFL - probably in the East of Scotland Seniors - for three years while they accumulated the necessary set of account before they could apply for SFA membership. Then they would be eligible to apply for any vacancy that arose in the SFL.
The fact that they have been admitted to SFL3 and been viewed as a continuation of the 'old' Rangers suggested that the should be made responsible for football debts as well as any punishments handed down regading dual contracts and other malpractice.
-
03-08-2012 07:55 AM #19579
Not sure how new this news is but it was posted on the BBc last evening - the commission to investigate the EBTs.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19102870#PERSEVERED
-
03-08-2012 07:58 AM #19580This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-08-2012 08:11 AM #19581This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-08-2012 08:54 AM #19582This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
A few points:-
1. I am not sure how the commission differs from the legal firm that were appointed in the first place. Perhaps the lawyers have assembled the evidence, and it will be up to the commission to hear that, and to hear counter-arguments from the other side.
2. who are "the other side"? Is it NewHun or OldHun?
3. like the SFA tribunal, I am pleased to see that the commission will be independent. Although the anti-Doncaster lobby might see this as him washing his hands of any responsibility for a nasty verdict for Rangers, I think it is a sign of transparency.
-
03-08-2012 09:02 AM #19583
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,714
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
After the failure of the CVA nobody could prevent the end of Rangers Football Club and when it folded everything about it was consigned to history. It is the memory of that club and not the club itself that will survive. People will do everything they can to pretend that the club brings with it its history and past successes and the Scottish Football Authorities and media are working hard to that end.
Opinions eh?
-
03-08-2012 09:06 AM #19584This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote#PERSEVERED
-
03-08-2012 09:49 AM #19585This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They should be changing the voting structure though, that's the first step to changing the income-sharing but one doesn't have to follow the other immediately. Maybe they should also be looking at gate-sharing before the distribution of TV money as well.
-
03-08-2012 09:59 AM #19586
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 3,275
Chris Musson@camusson SPL:"At eight minutes past ten this morning, the member clubs unanimously approved the transfer of Rangers’ SPL share to Dundee" #ohthedrama
-
03-08-2012 10:21 AM #19587This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The alternative as you suggest is treating them as a completely new club with no obligations carrying over from the old one, but concessions have already been made by allowing that club to enter the league structure several steps higher than they should have and allowing them to use the name 'Rangers'. This means that Sevco are now neither one thing nor the other as a result of weak management by the authorities, but they seem to be gravitating more towards the continuation side, so they need to face the charges raised against the club when it was operated by the company that is now approaching liquidation. They would be allowed to keep the club's history though, subject to amendment for seasons where the old company fielded ineligible players.
-
03-08-2012 05:07 PM #19588This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-08-2012 05:25 PM #19589
Just back from hols, did the Currents get their full SFA membership in time for this weekend's glamour clash with Peterhead?
-
03-08-2012 05:34 PM #19590This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19120224
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks