This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Liquidated should mean just that.
Never mind Scottish Fitba', the country would be a better place without them.
One down, one to go.......,
![]()
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 10,891 to 10,920 of 45185
-
12-06-2012 12:44 PM #10891
-
12-06-2012 12:45 PM #10892
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,515
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 12:46 PM #10893This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 12:49 PM #10894This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 12:51 PM #10895This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 12:52 PM #10896
so predictions...what will come first application by NewBuns to SPL...or Re-convened SFA tribunal....timings / order in all this makes it all the more interesting....chance of SPL fixtures being out on shedule next Monday....NIL
plenty more pages of this thread before a ball is kicked next season....
-
12-06-2012 12:52 PM #10897This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This has to be said about Rangers FC, briefly, because Prague beckons. As a Scottish football club, they are a permanent embarrassment and an occasional disgrace. This country would be a better place if Rangers did not exist. -- Ian Archer, 9 October 1976.
-
12-06-2012 12:52 PM #10898
I feel the spl clubs will bottle it and let them back as a newco into the spl
-
12-06-2012 12:52 PM #10899
Apologies if this has been asked but i`ve not read through the last few pages yet..but how does this now affect the double contract investigation, the ineligible players and the years of cheating.
Is all of this now irrelevant? Can the newco still be liable for this?
-
12-06-2012 12:53 PM #10900This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Duff and Phelps have not covered themselves in glory with this one.
This whole thing has been a stitch-up from the start.
-
12-06-2012 12:54 PM #10901This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 12:54 PM #10902
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Back in the town
- Age
- 61
- Posts
- 12,314
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Not enough. Re-start in Division 3 or there is no integrity left whatsoever. They have cheated for years, let them suffer and start again at the bottom.
-
12-06-2012 12:54 PM #10903
FC Govan
Does anybody actually think that the other SFL Chairmen will vote for FC Govan to reapply for the league and start again in division 3?
Turkeys do not vote for christmas and St Johnstone, Kilmarnock, St Mirren and probably even Celtic will keep FC Govan alive in the SPL. Its a total disgrace that a team running up so much debt and breaking so many rules will probably get away with it just because of who they are.
As a side issue does anybody else have doubts that Hibs will vote with integrity on this matter? I for one dont.
I dont post often but I am furious about this. If this was Hibs, Hearts, etc we all know what the outcome would be.
-
12-06-2012 12:54 PM #10904This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 12:56 PM #10905
How can a clause in the CVA...a CVA that has now failed...be invoked to sell all the assets for £5.5m before the liquidators are appointed?
This seems like hot air and hubris and would almost certianly be challenged in court by the main creditors no?
Should the admins not now pass this to the liquidators as is and the liquidator will then pursue best value for the assets for the creditors...i.e effectively Rangers are now owned by their creditors and therefore all assets should be retained for their benefit. The common shareholder has been wiped out
What I don't understand is when this legally happens..when does the control/ownership move from the common shareholder to the liquidator/creditor? And I certainly don't understand why D&P and Green are in such an unholy rush to get the £5.5m deal completed...one final attmept to shaft every creditor one last time?
-
12-06-2012 12:57 PM #10906
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Age
- 50
- Posts
- 27,490
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The SPL doesn't have any other divisions so punting them to Division 3 isn't an option for the SPL. They just have to decide on a yes or no basis and it would be for the SFL to worry about how they fill the gap.
-
12-06-2012 12:57 PM #10907This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 12:58 PM #10908
in between all the no surrender watp blah blah blah threads on swallow swallow, there's actually a sensible thread asking a pertinent question in relation to the NIC's/PAYE/VAT whatever monies(which i've often wondered about myself) , WHY in the last several months did HMRC not do anything about the non-payments from the buns
hertz get a letter of court proceedings every other month that they haven't been paid, so why allow the buns to go month after month after month without doing something about it a helluva lot sooner
apologies if Q already answered 2,333,532 posts ago
-
12-06-2012 01:00 PM #10909This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 01:00 PM #10910This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 01:01 PM #10911This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Div 3 would be my favoured route---and should ensure all those saying they would not go back without punishment will fill ER to the brim
-
12-06-2012 01:01 PM #10912This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
but it wasn't just the one or two payments though, or was it
-
12-06-2012 01:01 PM #10913
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Age
- 50
- Posts
- 27,490
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hearts would have got that too if they hadn't paid up each time at the last minute.
-
12-06-2012 01:02 PM #10914This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Well, not really. Would rather they just suffered than disappeared.
When the EBT thingy is done and dusted with the Gers it will be the Yams turn next. Seem to remember something dodgy about Skatchels reported wage in a court case a few months back?
Maybe that bloody Scottish Cup will end up on the ER sideboard after all...........,
-
12-06-2012 01:04 PM #10915This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 01:06 PM #10916This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 01:07 PM #10917This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 01:07 PM #10918This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 01:08 PM #10919
Sorry if this has been asked/answered before, but i've seen a few rankgers fans complaining that the league structure was once changed to keep aberdeen in the spl years ago. Cant find any articles to back this statement up and maybe im too young to remember, was wondering if anybody is able to shed any light on this?
-
12-06-2012 01:09 PM #10920
My opinion is that the situation has got to a stage where it is getting almost impossible for clubs to be able to vote them in to the SPL due to the furious backlash from their own fans.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks