Exactly. Shyster no. 1 in our affair was David Rowland who simply wanted to sell the assets - football wasn't even a consideration. Rangers, on the other hand, have cheated to attract the best possible players to the club (often to the detriment of other Scottish teams) - their recent domestic and European "success" has extremely dodgy foundations.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 8,701 to 8,730 of 45185
-
24-05-2012 07:29 AM #8701
-
24-05-2012 07:32 AM #8702
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- In the west travelling east.
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 10,613
- Blog Entries
- 1
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 07:36 AM #8703This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 07:38 AM #8704
Cheers for the replies- i agree with the gist of them.
I suppose what i am trying to say is rather than risk losing thousands of fans to the game at a particularly bad time i would much rather see those directly responsible held to account in a court of law.
There is no doubt that a newco should have to start from the bottom.
As ever though the fans will be the ones who suffer most.
-
24-05-2012 07:41 AM #8705
George Adams, previous head of youth development at Ibrox, received a little over £30,000 through his EBT. Many of you may not have heard of this man (after all, he is hardly a household name), however, Mr Adams is the director of football at newly promoted Ross County, one of the teams who would theoretically have a vote in any decision to allow (or not allow) any NewCo Rangers back into the SPL. This is a conflict of interest.
-
24-05-2012 07:53 AM #8706This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Each and every hun i know has said no, they wouldn't change a thing. These were the best days of their lives supporting them they tell me.
Well they need that balanced out now imo, and perhaps their opinion might be different the next time?
-
24-05-2012 08:00 AM #8707This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There is going to be a lot more of this to come
07-minister.jpg
Any photo shop experts stick Doncasters head on this
-
24-05-2012 08:01 AM #8708This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 08:02 AM #8709
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 3,042
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If the SPL concluded their investigation now, and handed out the punishment and demoted them to division 3, the newco would have to start there. Doncaster is pushing this Newco being allowed straight back in. The SPL will say at the end of all this that they would have punished Old Rangers severely but their hands were tied as its now a different company.
-
24-05-2012 08:17 AM #8710This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
These EBT's have broken the SFA rules and the club should have it's membership withdrawn.
Takes the decision out of the SPL's hands.
If they're such a big club they can reform in the Juniors and work their way up.
-
24-05-2012 08:26 AM #8711
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 19
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 08:29 AM #8712This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Remember that Ogilvie also took this EBT scheme to Hearts when he left Rangers, so to say he knew nothing about players and side contracts must prove him to be an out and out liar.
-
24-05-2012 08:35 AM #8713
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
An Observation;
Given that Celtic have now admitted that they used an EBT will those that are defending Rangers (SPL, Sportsound et al) use this to try to drag Celtic into this mess and argue that the quantity dosent matter but the fact that they did it should attract the same punishment. Albeit Celtic used it once and, when advised, they stopped it.
Furthermore this would be a good time for Hearts to admit theirs and it would make it difficult/awkward for firm penalties to be enforced against Rangers. and allow their own misdemeanours to slip under the radar.
As I said, just a thought.
-
24-05-2012 08:41 AM #8714This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Interestingly some Celtic fans are saying they would be happy to be stripped of their title that year.
-
24-05-2012 08:45 AM #8715
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 3,042
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 08:46 AM #8716
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Of course this is nonsense and Celtic's EBT dosent even register when compared to others but, as I said, if you are trying to assist Rangers I can see how someone (Doncaster) might argue this point.
Incidentally ragerstaxcase.com won the 2012 Orwell Blog prize so a big well done to those guys for refusing to be silenced.Last edited by Kaiser1962; 24-05-2012 at 09:22 AM.
-
24-05-2012 08:52 AM #8717This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
However, I still think Skacel court case with his agent, due to return to Court next month will prove the player was getting a lot more cash for playing for Hearts than the amount recorded in is Hearts Contract.
His Contract, according to press reports was for 190,000 Euros per year, thats about £ 3000 per week. I don't think he came back for that considering what others were on at the PBS.
-
24-05-2012 08:52 AM #8718
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,458
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Use of EBT's isn't illegal, not declaring it / using hidden contracts is as far as the SFA / SPL are concerned, that's the issue.
-
24-05-2012 08:55 AM #8719
Besides everything else, the programme claimed to have evidence connecting this whole thing directly to the team that was put on the pitch via EBT payments to players as salary top ups.
Ergo players who were otherwise unaffordable became affordable
Better players who brought more success
CHEATING
If this is proven, they're goners.HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875
-
24-05-2012 08:55 AM #8720
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 08:56 AM #8721This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 09:01 AM #8722This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The hidden contracts given to players make this illegal from a tax point of view and also against the rules of the sfa/spl.
-
24-05-2012 09:01 AM #8723This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
From what I can see of the rules though, there is absolutely no provision for a newco, but there are a number of rules that could be read as specifically prohibiting one from joining the SPL.
If you or anyone else has any further dealings with Doncaster it might be worth asking him to forward copies of any documents he quotes.
-
24-05-2012 09:03 AM #8724This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875
-
24-05-2012 09:06 AM #8725This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There's a few alright ones but not many..
-
24-05-2012 09:15 AM #8726
Boycott of all Rangers supporting clubs.
Following the statement from the Killie chairman, Michael Johnston, who thinks that Rangers have been punished enough and no more sanctions should be taken against them, I think that supporters of all other clubs who oppose this view should boycott all matches at Rugby Park, and any other clubs that take Johnston's and Rangers side. If Johnston thinks that Rangers are key to his clubs existence, they may lose out on TV money and one or two visits of the current buns per season, but how much more would they lose if they played all season with no visiting supporters.
Tell me if you think this idea is rubbish or if you think that it might be a goer?
-
24-05-2012 09:20 AM #8727This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-05-2012 09:20 AM #8728This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
http://www.scotprem.com/content/medi...MAY%202012.pdf
SFA Articles of Association
http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/resource...09Articles.pdf
12.1 The Board may arrange for an inspection of all such books, records and details for
any purpose, including but not limited to, National Club Licensing. Such inspection
may be conducted by the Board, such authorised employees of the Association, the
Association’s auditors or other professional advisers duly appointed by the Board
on giving to any club or recognised football body reasonable notice of its intention
to do so.
Furthermore, all payments, whether made by the club or otherwise, which are to
be made to a player solely relating to his playing activities must be fully recorded
within the relevant written agreement with the player prior to submission to this
Association and/or the recognised football body of which his club is in membership.Last edited by Kojock; 24-05-2012 at 09:39 AM.
-
24-05-2012 09:29 AM #8729
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There is a definite incongruence between words and actions.
-
24-05-2012 09:31 AM #8730This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I've just ordered a copy of the SPL articles - I'll give my thoughts once I've had a chance to look at them.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks