hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 235 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 1351852252332342352362372452853357351235 ... LastLast
Results 7,021 to 7,050 of 45185
  1. #7021
    @hibs.net private member lapsedhibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    21,597
    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Fab.

    Has McCoist demanded to know the identity of the author yet?


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #7022
    Coaching Staff hibsbollah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    54
    Posts
    36,485
    I wouldnt like to be a postie on Yorkston's round for the next few weeks.

  4. #7023
    @hibs.net private member Jim44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    77
    Posts
    23,518
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Brazil View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    According to Beeb radio / S Thompson D Utd chairman - it is the decision of the SPL board - so the clubs may not even get / have to vote on this. That is the current rules of the SPL - there is nothing written down that the clubs get to vote on this - but as we know rules can be changed.
    I think they want all clubs involved because the board members are frightened of reprisals from Rangers supporters. What a sad state of affairs.

  5. #7024
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,488
    Another interesting blog update by Albion Rovers fan McConville re the TBK view of things

    http://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.co...t-post-by-den/
    Last edited by grunt; 06-05-2012 at 08:15 PM. Reason: Got it wrong

  6. #7025
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Helmsley, York
    Age
    59
    Posts
    4,272
    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Another interesting blog update by Celtc fan McConville re the TBK view of things

    http://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.co...t-post-by-den/
    McConville is an Albion Rovers fan.

  7. #7026
    Why has no one within a "high position" within Scottish football or media come out and really questioned why we need Rangers. I just don't get the argument for keeping them. Look at it from a Hibs point of view, we've had one game against them this season (at ER) so what's that £98k in ticket sales on their side. How much does it cost to police the game? Deduct the extra amount compared to a normal game from the £98k. Even IF you add in hospitality and the likes I seriously doubt they bring us in more than £100k a game. Flip that round and lets say we lose 1k season ticket holders because their back in (probably more). That's a loss of of about £405,000 a season before you even start thinking about what they spend in the stadium. That's at least a difference of £300k. Add in we would have a better chance of winning trophies and making Europe and the extra revenue that brings in, I don't get it. ESPN have already said they will continue to screen the games, which leaves SKY. Have they ever come out and said there would be NO contract? They might not offer the full amount, but then Rangers get a massive chunk of it as it stands.
    Rod has to vote them out. Keeping them in the SPL could kill us more than kicking them out.

  8. #7027
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Liberal Hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    McConville is an Albion Rovers fan.
    Sorry, my mistake

  9. #7028
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    46
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by DH1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why has no one within a "high position" within Scottish football or media come out and really questioned why we need Rangers. I just don't get the argument for keeping them. Look at it from a Hibs point of view, we've had one game against them this season (at ER) so what's that £98k in ticket sales on their side. How much does it cost to police the game? Deduct the extra amount compared to a normal game from the £98k. Even IF you add in hospitality and the likes I seriously doubt they bring us in more than £100k a game. Flip that round and lets say we lose 1k season ticket holders because their back in (probably more). That's a loss of of about £405,000 a season before you even start thinking about what they spend in the stadium. That's at least a difference of £300k. Add in we would have a better chance of winning trophies and making Europe and the extra revenue that brings in, I don't get it. ESPN have already said they will continue to screen the games, which leaves SKY. Have they ever come out and said there would be NO contract? They might not offer the full amount, but then Rangers get a massive chunk of it as it stands.
    Rod has to vote them out. Keeping them in the SPL could kill us more than kicking them out.
    Said this a few posts back, RP isnt as daft as some people on here seem to think. I do not expect Hibs will vote for newco Rangers back in SPL.

  10. #7029
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by DH1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why has no one within a "high position" within Scottish football or media come out and really questioned why we need Rangers. I just don't get the argument for keeping them. Look at it from a Hibs point of view, we've had one game against them this season (at ER) so what's that £98k in ticket sales on their side. How much does it cost to police the game? Deduct the extra amount compared to a normal game from the £98k. Even IF you add in hospitality and the likes I seriously doubt they bring us in more than £100k a game. Flip that round and lets say we lose 1k season ticket holders because their back in (probably more). That's a loss of of about £405,000 a season before you even start thinking about what they spend in the stadium. That's at least a difference of £300k. Add in we would have a better chance of winning trophies and making Europe and the extra revenue that brings in, I don't get it. ESPN have already said they will continue to screen the games, which leaves SKY. Have they ever come out and said there would be NO contract? They might not offer the full amount, but then Rangers get a massive chunk of it as it stands.
    Rod has to vote them out. Keeping them in the SPL could kill us more than kicking them out.
    Al Jazeera are reputedly trying to break into the sports TV business and could be a replacement for Sky.

    You never know a show of resolve from the SPL could reap benefits in terms of attendances.

    Then Celtic could be outvoted to even up the cash allocation to claw some of the losses back.

    I suspect that the clubs will be worse off than they are this season. However they will be in a better position than they will be if Rangers are waved back in.

    There will be an organized boycott that will lose the SPL a large number of supporters and there will also be a drifting away of support through apathy that may cost even more.

  11. #7030
    @hibs.net private member Jim44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    77
    Posts
    23,518
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by reallapsedhibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Fab.

    Has McCoist demanded to know the identity of the author yet?
    He probably spoke to him at Ibrox on Friday when he destroyed Paul Clark in the interview after the 'successful bid' announcement.

  12. #7031
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,452
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Said this a few posts back, RP isnt as daft as some people on here seem to think. I do not expect Hibs will vote for newco Rangers back in SPL.
    More than anything else from this sorry situation I hope you are correct.

  13. #7032
    Coaching Staff HUTCHYHIBBY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    EDINBURGH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    24,160
    Al Jazeera are only interested in covering Dundee Utd games!

  14. #7033
    Quote Originally Posted by HUTCHYHIBBY View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Al Jazeera are only interested in covering Dundee Utd games!

  15. #7034
    @hibs.net private member FitbaFolkKen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Newtongrange
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,269

    Can't bel;ieve I read this

    Sorry if posted elsewhere....

    "The clubs are mindful of a sporting integrity aspect but the commercial benefits may outweigh that." Killie Chairman Michael Johnston.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17967968

    Totally corrupt statement if ever I have seen one.I haven't been to wound up about this scenario but reading this really got my goat.

    He might as well have said my vote can be bought, our game is spiralling to it's death I fear.

  16. #7035
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dùn Éideann, Alba
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,863
    Quote Originally Posted by mchibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Sorry if posted elsewhere....

    "The clubs are mindful of a sporting integrity aspect but the commercial benefits may outweigh that." Killie Chairman Michael Johnston.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17967968

    Totally corrupt statement if ever I have seen one.I haven't been to wound up about this scenario but reading this really got my goat.

    He might as well have said my vote can be bought, our game is spiralling to it's death I fear.
    Bend over Michael, dinnae forget your vaseline

    Michael Johnston >>>
    Last edited by Saorsa; 07-05-2012 at 07:52 AM.

  17. #7036
    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Another excellent piece fron Alex Thomson, but for most of it he's only stating the blindingly obvious. Why can't Doncaster et al see it.

    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Another interesting blog update by Albion Rovers fan McConville re the TBK view of things

    http://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.co...t-post-by-den/
    An interesting comment from D&P in there:

    HMRC and Ticketus are both creditors of the company and the creditors have voted in favour of the proposals which enable us to do this deal.
    First, he carefully avoids saying that HMRC and Ticketus have individually voted in favour, all he says is that the creditors as a body have voted in favour.
    Second, as far as I'm aware all that the creditors have voted for is to allow D&P to carry out negotiations without referring back to the creditors each time. That's pretty much a formality unless they vote to remove the administrators and I doubt if it needed the 75% value majority.

    Not quite a lie, but not quite the truth - that's the way things are going in this depressing story.

  18. #7037
    @hibs.net private member Jim44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    77
    Posts
    23,518
    Blog Entries
    1
    Stephen Thomson says it's a lose-lose situation. Well mate, what is the greater loss? The level of working capital which, OK, will require some rationalisation of their business plans which would eventially flatten out etc. Or to lose the body, heart and soul of their clubs. No brainer in my opinion.

  19. #7038
    Testimonial Due BarneyK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim44 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Stephen Thomson says it's a lose-lose situation. Well mate, what is the greater loss? The level of working capital which, OK, will require some rationalisation of their business plans which would eventially flatten out etc. Or to lose the body, heart and soul of their clubs. No brainer in my opinion.
    Although I agree with this, I can see the predicament the custodians are in. If they were starting from fresh then fair enough. As it is though, they have players on contracts who require paying as per those contracts, and those contracts were agreed with the money coming in as it currently does. If there is suddenly a £600k deficit, how do they manage that?

    A way has to be found. This is too important to just let it slide.

  20. #7039
    @hibs.net private member bingo70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Age
    43
    Posts
    35,668
    Quote Originally Posted by BarneyK View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Although I agree with this, I can see the predicament the custodians are in. If they were starting from fresh then fair enough. As it is though, they have players on contracts who require paying as per those contracts, and those contracts were agreed with the money coming in as it currently does. If there is suddenly a £600k deficit, how do they manage that?

    A way has to be found. This is too important to just let it slide.
    With the exception of Gretna who were never a real club anyway clubs that get relegated always seem to survive so everyone would find a way of getting bye, players would take wage cuts or be released and more young players would get a chance.

    I think a bigger predicament for the people making the decisions is the likelyhood of death threats etc on them from the moron rangers fans, it's something they're bound to be wary of.

  21. #7040
    Testimonial Due BarneyK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,149
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo70 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    With the exception of Gretna who were never a real club anyway clubs that get relegated always seem to survive so everyone would find a way of getting bye, players would take wage cuts or be released and more young players would get a chance.

    I think a bigger predicament for the people making the decisions is the likelyhood of death threats etc on them from the moron rangers fans, it's something they're bound to be wary of.
    Very good point. To be honest, I don't think Hibs would be so badly affected.

  22. #7041
    Quote Originally Posted by BarneyK View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Although I agree with this, I can see the predicament the custodians are in. If they were starting from fresh then fair enough. As it is though, they have players on contracts who require paying as per those contracts, and those contracts were agreed with the money coming in as it currently does. If there is suddenly a £600k deficit, how do they manage that?

    A way has to be found. This is too important to just let it slide.
    The simple way to defuse the whole situation is for Rangers to man-up and take their punishment. McCoist et al have already acknowledged that the "right thing to so" is for the Huns to start again in the 3rd Div - for the sake of sport and fair play. The fact that they are insisting on a much lesser punishment shows the calibre of the man and the Huns as a species. Self interest and preservation - whether it is deserved or not- is all that matters to them.

    If the Huns (who basically are bankrupt anyway) went to that meeting and said, we acknowledge the problems we've caused to ourselves, HMRC, other clubs and creditors etc and accept that any NewCo needs to start again - stick us in the 3rd Div, then there is no decision for the SPL/SFA or other clubs. They would just have to get on and re-cut their business plans, cut back their operations and get on with it.

    This is all about the Huns, caused by the Huns and they will kill the sport - unless THEY do what's right.

  23. #7042
    Testimonial Due BarneyK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Onion View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The simple way to defuse the whole situation is for Rangers to man-up and take their punishment. McCoist et al have already acknowledged that the "right thing to so" is for the Huns to start again in the 3rd Div - for the sake of sport and fair play. The fact that they are insisting on a much lesser punishment shows the calibre of the man and the Huns as a species. Self interest and preservation - whether it is deserved or not- is all that matters to them.

    If the Huns (who basically are bankrupt anyway) went to that meeting and said, we acknowledge the problems we've caused to ourselves, HMRC, other clubs and creditors etc and accept that any NewCo needs to start again - stick us in the 3rd Div, then there is no decision for the SPL/SFA or other clubs. They would just have to get on and re-cut their business plans, cut back their operations and get on with it.

    This is all about the Huns, caused by the Huns and they will kill the sport - unless THEY do what's right.
    True, but it will have an effect on the other clubs in Scotland. Let's not be so blind as to refuse that plain fact. I'm not saying make our decision based on that, but acknowledge it at least. It could be the difference between us signing McPake and not signing McPake. Personally, I would be more comfortable playing 11 kids for a few seasons than compromising the integrity of the game, but there is another side. The game would be hard to stomach if they are allowed to stay in the SPL, that's for sure.

  24. #7043
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo70 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    With the exception of Gretna who were never a real club anyway clubs that get relegated always seem to survive so everyone would find a way of getting bye, players would take wage cuts or be released and more young players would get a chance.

    I think a bigger predicament for the people making the decisions is the likelyhood of death threats etc on them from the moron rangers fans, it's something they're bound to be wary of.
    This has always been an issue with the OF and one of the main reasons referees have favoured them over the years in key decisions, and the SFA have done NOTHING about bigotry/sectarianism. This decision however is on another level altogether, and exactly why UEFA need to step in and sort them out.

    Do you think UEFA would allow NewCo straight into the SPL, take 5 months to investigate Whyte, or worry about the Huns threats ? No chance.

  25. #7044
    Testimonial Due James70's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Caledonia
    Posts
    2,040
    Can't help but wonder what the late Ernie Walker, Jim Farry and Willie Allan would have made of this whole debacle and how they would have handled it.

  26. #7045
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in the town
    Age
    61
    Posts
    12,314
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo70 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    With the exception of Gretna who were never a real club anyway clubs that get relegated always seem to survive so everyone would find a way of getting bye, players would take wage cuts or be released and more young players would get a chance.

    I think a bigger predicament for the people making the decisions is the likelyhood of death threats etc on them from the moron rangers fans, it's something they're bound to be wary of.
    I don't. I think it is pure unadulterated greed on behalf of the Directors.

    Spoke to a director of a SPL club this morning re Steven Thompson's "dilemma" which seemingly is causing him a lot of heart searching. One of the fears is that with any potential loss of income the club could really struggle to survive as all contracts are worked out on budgets. The Bank Managers don't want to hear about morals when it comes to paying bills over the short term. Basically don't have sympathy with that argument as I was always taught to stand up for your beliefs. Hibs have done it for years and look at the grief they have had on this message board apart from in the wider world. Why should they continue to be penalised for behaving. Imagine if we were to suffer the ultimate penalty and get relegated this season for trying to budget. Where is the justice in that?

    At this moment in time I feel like a guy who has found out his girlfriend has cheated on him again. Do you forgive or finally make the right decision and tell her to get tae? Do you still speak to friends who knew all along what was going on or do you shut them out your life as well because basically you don't need friends like that. You know eventually you will find something to replace the void so are you big enough to make the right decision.

    Without being too dramatic tonight could be my last time inside Easter Road and that is a strange feeling.

  27. #7046
    ADMIN marinello59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    I still live in hope.
    Posts
    40,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Onion View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This has always been an issue with the OF and one of the main reasons referees have favoured them over the years in key decisions, and the SFA have done NOTHING about bigotry/sectarianism. This decision however is on another level altogether, and exactly why UEFA need to step in and sort them out.

    Do you think UEFA would allow NewCo straight into the SPL, take 5 months to investigate Whyte, or worry about the Huns threats ? No chance.
    I don't see how UEFA could get involved. The SPL would not be bending or breaking any rules as the rules to deal with this situation satisfactorily don't currently exist.
    Every gimmick hungry yob,
    Digging gold from rock and roll
    Grabs the mic to tell us,
    He'll die before he's sold.

  28. #7047
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in the town
    Age
    61
    Posts
    12,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Supermac View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Can't help but wonder what the late Ernie Walker, Jim Farry and Willie Allan would have made of this whole debacle and how they would have handled it.

    They were all further up Rangers @rse than the current lot. At least the current bunch admit they are siding with Rangers. Previous ones did all their talking in the lodge don't let time disguise that.
    Last edited by PatHead; 07-05-2012 at 09:06 AM.

  29. #7048
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim44 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Stephen Thomson says it's a lose-lose situation. Well mate, what is the greater loss? The level of working capital which, OK, will require some rationalisation of their business plans which would eventually flatten out etc. Or to lose the body, heart and soul of their clubs. No brainer in my opinion.


    Its a numbers game now Jim, the guarantee of the Hun hordes ,or what walks away in the fall out .
    This will test Rod big time will he play safe with what he knows or not .

  30. #7049
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in the town
    Age
    61
    Posts
    12,314
    Quote Originally Posted by marinello59 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I don't see how UEFA could get involved. The SPL would not be bending or breaking any rules as the rules to deal with this situation satisfactorily don't currently exist.
    Surely bringing the game into disrepute by breaking financial fair play guidelines (or rules if they have reached that stage) Ban all Scottish clubs from Europe and hit them where it hurts.

  31. #7050
    Interesting post from Paul McConville this morning - 'unpalatable' read indeed!

    http://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.co...to-make-money/

    Is the SPL a sporting body or a commercial business?
    Last edited by TheEastTerrace; 07-05-2012 at 09:09 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)