It’s quite breath taking isn’t it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This is one of my favourite quotes:
“Many believe the game would survive just fine without a club some love to hate. Of course we'd play on but would we prosper?”
Yet goes on to say “at as time when crowds are dwindling and other clubs are in financial peril”
So if saving Rangers at all costs will give us untold prosperity going forward why are we facing dwindling crowds and financial peril elsewhere currently? Surely the hugely beneficial effect of having Rangers around for the last 100+ years should have made all of Scottish football great by now!
Not one mention of the fact that they have effectively cheated, that they got themselves into this mess and that we must do our utmost to ensure sporting integrity going forward…nope nothing but it’s no’ fair and Rangers must be saved not just for the fans but for the good of us all and to hell with the fact that they cheated every football fan in Scotland and every tax payer in the UK.
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 5,761 to 5,790 of 45185
-
25-04-2012 01:25 PM #5761
-
25-04-2012 01:33 PM #5762This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It is the same argument about not cancelling season tickets and making everyone pay to get in.
-
25-04-2012 01:39 PM #5763This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 01:56 PM #5764
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 872
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Does anyone No UEfa\FIFA stance Could they impose sanctions against Scotland if rangers got away with it?
-
25-04-2012 02:02 PM #5765
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 82
- Posts
- 14,429
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 02:05 PM #5766
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,458
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They will be watching, and waiting. Make no mistake!
-
25-04-2012 02:28 PM #5767
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dùn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 53
- Posts
- 10,863
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 02:49 PM #5768This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
As Grunt has said the last audited accounts were for the year ended 30 June 2010. The clean audit report was dated 22 September 2010 which was well before the events that have led directly to administration, so the going concern problems could not have been foreseen in that respect. However it's clear with hindsight that there was an unreported underlying debt that also threatens the club's existence and the question has to be whether the auditors could or should have been aware of this in September 2010.
Certainly, they were aware of the HMRC inquiry since it is referred to in the body of the accounts. The note includes the following: 'On the basis of expert tax advice, the club is defending a query raised by HMRC into this Trust'. The first bit is the important point - I would expect the auditors to have reviewed all correspondence between the tax experts, the club and HMRC and taken assurances from the experts, so they have someone else to blame. Likewise, in previous years they would probably have reviewed the operation of the scheme in conjunction with the experts' advice and concluded on that basis that there wasn't a problem. They could not really be expected to make a detailed judgement on whether it was clean or not since they are not experts in that field and it took HMRC themselves several years to reach a conclusion. That said (again possibly with the benefit of hindsight) I feel the note in the accounts might have been more robust and an emphasis of matter paragraph might have been appropriate given the scale of the amounts involved.
As to potential liability, the auditors could find themselves liable for any loss suffered by anyone who could claim to have depended on the accounts to make a financial decision. Ticketus would be the most obvious claimant, but their agreement stretched to a future period beyond the reasonable scope of the account so I think a claim would fail on that basis.
In short, I think the auditors are just about ok, but I suspect there are a few squeaky bums around their offices at the moment.
Bet you're sorry you asked now.
-
25-04-2012 02:57 PM #5769
IF the police and authorities have a modicum of common sense, then this will not be allowed to happen. no matter what end they proposed march happens, there will be trouble. the huns cant behave anywhere so they can gtf
-
25-04-2012 03:10 PM #5770
Jim Traynor sez...
"the chicanery of Craig Whyte and the willingness of Sir David Murray, below, who must accept a massive chunk of the blame for Rangers' sorry state, cannot be excused but it is madness to hold the club responsible"
So he's saying the Huns should get off scotfree? ....... aye right!
-
25-04-2012 03:18 PM #5771
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 15
Just seems to me they need or have to be the centre of everyone's world. Wish they would just accept the fact that they are cheating b__t_rds, they have been caught so put up with the consequences. Why they feel that ruining cup final day is not just totally stupid but the way they behave is totally f---in boring. Don't think the weedgie police will let this happen.
-
25-04-2012 03:18 PM #5772
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,458
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Perhaps the memory of the taste of lamb is fading?
-
25-04-2012 03:21 PM #5773This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 03:24 PM #5774Rangers now have a new bidder from china that says he will pay off ALL their debt, buy new players, refit the stadium and return rangers to their former glory.
Mr Nay Foo Kin Chans will meet with shareholders this week!
-
25-04-2012 03:29 PM #5775
[QUOTE=poolman;3196454]
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I do get the point perfectly well. The shoe is on the other foot and I'm loving it.. Hell mend them I say
I recall when we were at our lowest point when WM tried (& failed) to do us, who were in the wing, yes, the uglies who snapped up Andy Goram & John Collins on the cheap.As I say "Loving it"
-
25-04-2012 03:47 PM #5776This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
With a bit of luck, the rankgers faithful will try to handcuff or padlock themselves to the gates.
Always need a wee before a big game.
-
25-04-2012 03:54 PM #5777
Should we no just take long sharp sticks?
Seriously, the Huns chums in the polis will bend over backwards to help them and the losers here will be Edinburgh fans - weegie press will lap it up - lose/lose for us and the Yammish
-
25-04-2012 03:59 PM #5778
Lolz
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 04:10 PM #5779This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 04:35 PM #5780This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Similarly if Hibs finish bottom of the league, the ineptitude of Colin Calderwood's management cannot be excused but it would be madness to hold the club responsible. No relegation then, nice one Jim.
-
25-04-2012 04:40 PM #5781This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I like the word expunged. It has a sort of ring.
Roll on the huns being expunged. A sort of death knell.
-
25-04-2012 04:55 PM #5782This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But so were Third Lanark.
-
25-04-2012 04:58 PM #5783This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
-
25-04-2012 05:18 PM #5786This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 05:29 PM #5787This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 05:36 PM #5788
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,515
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-04-2012 05:40 PM #5789
So who are independent members of the panel that have apparently been leaked on the internet?
Shocking this has happened right enough.
-
25-04-2012 05:49 PM #5790
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 47
- Posts
- 27,228
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Owen Archdeacon, Gerry Crainey and Anton Rogan?
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks