hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 36 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 26343536373846861365361036 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,080 of 45185
  1. #1051
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    3,042
    Quote Originally Posted by TornadoHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That will depend upon the terms of the loan facility documentation and agreement(s) none of which we can guess about with any degree of accuracy !
    Its sounds to me like the parent company has taken out a loan that was due to be repaid via Rangers FC, if the loan was paid to the parent company, surely it was taken out by the parent company and therefore ticketus wont have to go accepting any administration deals?


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #1052
    Left by mutual consent! TornadoHibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    4,228
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs13681 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Its sounds to me like the parent company has taken out a loan that was due to be repaid via Rangers FC, if the loan was paid to the parent company, surely it was taken out by the parent company and therefore ticketus wont have to go accepting any administration deals?
    Very possibly but without seeing the documentation none of us can know the true position and debate is purely hypothetical!

  4. #1053
    Left by mutual consent! PaulSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,864
    Alastair Johnston has asked crown office to conduct a criminal fraud investigation into CW's takeover, as per bbc reporters twitter
    Last edited by PaulSmith; 16-02-2012 at 08:12 PM.

  5. #1054
    First Team Breakthrough DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Fenchurch East CID
    Posts
    273
    Having sat back and observed for the past few days now the countless stories, the media frenzy and the hundreds of comments posted on here, I just thought I'd fling my tuppence worth in, for all it's worth.

    Rangers have brought this misfortune on themselves entirely by their own doing and therefore should be held fully accountable. For one thing, as a UK taxpayer I am not happy at all that a company has diddled the Government out of at least £50 Million. It is in all our interests to see that this debt is paid back fully for our sakes.

    Like many others who have expressed the same opinion here I believe that what Rangers have done over the past two decades, i.e. spending stupendous amounts of money that didn't exist and refusing to pay their appropriate dues with HMRC in order to gain footballing success is nothing short of a swindle. There is no doubt about it it is CHEATING. Cheats break the rules and therefore must be punished by the rules.

    I have sat back and digested all of what the talking heads have to say - businessmen, lawyers, pundits, fans, idiot politicians - and I cannot reach any other conclusion that what we have here is undoubtedly an absolutely brilliant thing. For once, we have a fantastic opportunity to completely revamp Scottish football for the better. It is simply an opportunity we cannot and must not let pass us by.

    We have an opportunity to destroy the old corrupt ways run by the Glasgow clubs and get back some real football. We have an opportunity to kick out a club which seems to think that it has divine rule in the SPL and has a right to cheat its way into victory and has some sort of right to be in the SPL. We have an opportunity to break an unfair duopoly which has destroyed any competition in the SPL and has hence damaged the game. We have a chance to level things both financially and in football terms. We have a chance to kick out the odious heathen bigotry which has decimated the reputation of our game.

    We have a chance to have a fairer, livelier, more competative league, without the baggage of certain teams having an unfair political, financial and footballing upper hand, and without the disgusting ugly bigotry that seems to come with it.

    I am furious that we have the likes of idiot Salmond mouthing that the game will be better with Rangers than without. Piffle! Our game is suffering *because* of Rangers. Speak to the fans. The only people who want Rangers to stay are Rangers themselves! Everyone else cannot wait to boot them out! All fans' forums of other clubs are bristling with the exact same sentiments being expressed here - and that sentiment is for goodness' sake, kick them out, and good riddance!

    Now let's get that owed cash off them, get them liquidated, block any "phoenix" club from waltzing back in as if nothing has happened and let's get the rules, the cash and the league much fairer and look forward to good, entertaining, competitive football

    Gene

  6. #1055
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by TornadoHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I haven't looked at the accounts of RFC or any other Group (and therefore related) company but it is the case that assets cannot be moved from one entity to another (particularly related) entity unless they are transferred at "fair market value". Directors of companies which may be, or are likely to become insolvent must be very careful not to permit such transactions or to behave recklessly! This may help people follow this more easily!

    "(Fraudulent) preferences" or "transactions at undervalue" are things to look at particularly!
    The administrators were quite clear this afternoon in saying that the properties were still owned by RFC.

  7. #1056
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs13681 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not the full 24.4 million though, when the first payment was due Craig Whyte sold more tickets to ticketus to cover the first payment. I heard that he initially only sold about 16 million worth of ST but when the first repayment was due (about 9M) he sold more to bring the total money to 24.4M. As the second wave of ST sales was to pay for the first repayment, Whyte never actually had the 24.4M.

    It does seem that the only bills Whyte has been paying since he came has been the salaries.
    I am not getting this.

    The £24 million was advance of 4 years season tickets. That was advanced to RFC/Wavetower. If £16m of season tickets was sold by RFC, then the first repayment (£9m you say) could have easily been covered.

    Or am I misunderstanding you?

  8. #1057
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by ancienthibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Quite incredible:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-west-17067141

    We are the administrators and we do not know where this money went!!
    To be fair to them, they have only been in office 48 hours. It's unreasonable to expect them to know where money paid by a third party, possibly to a fourth party, went. All they can do, with any certainty, is say "we don't have it, and never have had it."
    Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 16-02-2012 at 08:45 PM.

  9. #1058
    @hibs.net private member SteveHFC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    32
    Posts
    23,928
    Less talk, more gifs. 21.05.16

  10. #1059
    Coaching Staff degenerated's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    At a post punk postcard fair
    Posts
    12,649
    Strathclyde polis confirm on their Facebook page that they have been passed information on current situation at rangers which they are examining but deem it inappropriate to comment further at this stage.

  11. #1060
    @hibs.net private member CallumLaidlaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Rosyth, Fife
    Age
    43
    Posts
    15,330
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: Cal_hibby
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Alastair Johnston has asked crown office to conduct a criminal fraud investigation into CW's takeover, as per bbc reporters twitter
    And now this -

    More developments: Strathclyde Police confirm they have received information on 'ongoing situation' at Rangers being examined by force

  12. #1061
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    3,042
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I am not getting this.

    The £24 million was advance of 4 years season tickets. That was advanced to RFC/Wavetower. If £16m of season tickets was sold by RFC, then the first repayment (£9m you say) could have easily been covered.

    Or am I misunderstanding you?
    What I am saying is the original deal between Whyte and Ticketus wasnt for 24.4 million, it was for about 16 million. The first repayment was due to ticketus and whyte couldnt pay it, so, he sold more tickets to ticketus to raise the cash for the first repayment, therefore Whyte only ever received 16 million or so from ticketus, the remainder was immediately given back to ticketus as per of the first repayment. He has basically taken out another loan secured against ST's to pay a repayment installment of a loan.

  13. #1062
    Left by mutual consent! TornadoHibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    4,228
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The administrators were quite clear this afternoon in saying that the properties were still owned by RFC.
    I didn't know one way or the other is what I was saying but I felt that some background to what can safely be done with assets of potentially or actually insolvent companies might be helpful in this thread!

  14. #1063
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs13681 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What I am saying is the original deal between Whyte and Ticketus wasnt for 24.4 million, it was for about 16 million. The first repayment was due to ticketus and whyte couldnt pay it, so, he sold more tickets to ticketus to raise the cash for the first repayment, therefore Whyte only ever received 16 million or so from ticketus, the remainder was immediately given back to ticketus as per of the first repayment. He has basically taken out another loan secured against ST's to pay a repayment installment of a loan.
    We're having this conversation on two threads now. Let's keep it here

    So.. Wavetower/CW gets £24m, but gives £8m back as the first repayment, yeah?

    So Ticketus are now owed £16m.

    CW uses the £16m to partly pay Lloyds TSB, plus another £2m from somewhere.

    RFC owes CW £18m now.

    RFC also owe Ticketus £16m.

    BUT.... Wavetower owe RFC £16m as well for the Ticketus money that they never got.

    Yeah??

  15. #1064
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by TornadoHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I didn't know one way or the other is what I was saying but I felt that some background to what can safely be done with assets of potentially or actually insolvent companies might be helpful in this thread!
    I get that

    There has been so much talk about the properties being transferred out , and I was concerned that it may have happened .. albeit illegally, as you say. Therefore I was pleased that someone asked that question this afternoon, and that the admins nailed that particular myth.

  16. #1065
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    3,042
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    We're having this conversation on two threads now. Let's keep it here

    So.. Wavetower/CW gets £24m, but gives £8m back as the first repayment, yeah?

    So Ticketus are now owed £16m.

    CW uses the £16m to partly pay Lloyds TSB, plus another £2m from somewhere.

    RFC owes CW £18m now.

    RFC also owe Ticketus £16m.

    BUT.... Wavetower owe RFC £16m as well for the Ticketus money that they never got.

    Yeah??
    No, apparently there was a deal with rangers and ticketus for a smaller amount prior to Whyte getting involved, around 8 million. Whyte came in and sold Future ST's and got 16 million from ticketus (Total debt to ticketus now 24 million). Rangers sold 15 million worth of ST's and the deal is meant to mean ticketus get their cash first before rangers, but when ticketus asked for their money rangers could only afford 3.5 million. Whyte agreed a deal with ticketus for an additional amount to cover the outstanding repayment. So at this point Rangers / whyte owe ticketus 24 million with Rangers having to pay 9 million as first installment. Rangers can only afford 3.5 million so they agree a deal with ticketus to sell more future ST's, at this point I am not sure whether rangers paid the 3,5 million or they just agreed that the outstanding repayment is added to the existing debt and secured against even more future ST sales. As I say this is what I have heard but its from a guy I know that used to work for Rangers and still has access to info and people in the know. What I would like to know though is if Rangers got 24 million from ticketus, how much do they actually owe them, I wonder what ticketus' interest is like.

  17. #1066
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs13681 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No, apparently there was a deal with rangers and ticketus for a smaller amount prior to Whyte getting involved, around 8 million. Whyte came in and sold Future ST's and got 16 million from ticketus (Total debt to ticketus now 24 million). Rangers sold 15 million worth of ST's and the deal is meant to mean ticketus get their cash first before rangers, but when ticketus asked for their money rangers could only afford 3.5 million. Whyte agreed a deal with ticketus for an additional amount to cover the outstanding repayment. So at this point Rangers / whyte owe ticketus 24 million with Rangers having to pay 9 million as first installment. Rangers can only afford 3.5 million so they agree a deal with ticketus to sell more future ST's, at this point I am not sure whether rangers paid the 3,5 million or they just agreed that the outstanding repayment is added to the existing debt and secured against even more future ST sales. As I say this is what I have heard but its from a guy I know that used to work for Rangers and still has access to info and people in the know. What I would like to know though is if Rangers got 24 million from ticketus, how much do they actually owe them, I wonder what ticketus' interest is like.
    Rangers didn't actually get the £24m though, that's the thing. The holding company maybe did, but not the football club.

    As far as I can make out, RFC will owe them the full whack......whatever that is!! But Wavetower owe RFC the same amount.

    This tells you all you need to know about the Ticketus model..... http://www.principlefirst.co.uk/inve.../octopus-vcts/
    Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 16-02-2012 at 09:29 PM.

  18. #1067
    Quote Originally Posted by degenerated View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If, as has been previously suggested, that the ticketus money was either in whytes sweaty little hands or in escrow prior to the deal being concluded then the little shyster has used an asset as collateral to finance the purchase of the huns. I'm sure the relevant authorities will be looking quite closely at that one won't be an FSA investigation it'll be the fraud squad
    There's a scene in All The President's Men when Deep Throat says to Woodward, ' follow the money, that's the key'. Something similar here needs to be done; hope the Administrators are on it/up to it.

  19. #1068
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by H18SVG View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Rangers supporters at my work are 100% confident that Rangers will come out of this better, still in the SPL because the league will not survive without them. "The SPL are already holding talks to ensure we (Rangers) are still in the league, they would lose too much money in tv rights and other revenue. All the clubs in scotland would fold"

    Not a hint of a smile.
    Total belief.

    I started smirking and ended raging.
    Ask them how strong they will feel when Ibrox, Murray Park and the car park are taken off them to pay some of the tax, and when HMRC ask for the rest to be paid off at £5m a year. That's the way the wind is starting to blow, I reckon.

  20. #1069
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    9,483
    Quote Originally Posted by H18SVG View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Rangers supporters at my work are 100% confident that Rangers will come out of this better, still in the SPL because the league will not survive without them. "The SPL are already holding talks to ensure we (Rangers) are still in the league, they would lose too much money in tv rights and other revenue. All the clubs in scotland would fold"

    Not a hint of a smile.
    Total belief.

    I started smirking and ended raging.

    Their mood swing-o-meter on Rangers Media Bears Den has gone from 'Smug as F***' at around 4pm post media conference to 'In need of new underwear' since around 10pm and the criminal investigation information........they are already hawking ideas to save money.......probably along the lines of a hubcap amnesty or handing in as many Globe juice bottles as they can get there hands (or hauns) on (or oan).

  21. #1070
    First Team Regular SurferRosa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Over the rainbow
    Posts
    521
    Quote Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Having sat back and observed for the past few days now the countless stories, the media frenzy and the hundreds of comments posted on here, I just thought I'd fling my tuppence worth in, for all it's worth.

    Rangers have brought this misfortune on themselves entirely by their own doing and therefore should be held fully accountable. For one thing, as a UK taxpayer I am not happy at all that a company has diddled the Government out of at least £50 Million. It is in all our interests to see that this debt is paid back fully for our sakes.

    Like many others who have expressed the same opinion here I believe that what Rangers have done over the past two decades, i.e. spending stupendous amounts of money that didn't exist and refusing to pay their appropriate dues with HMRC in order to gain footballing success is nothing short of a swindle. There is no doubt about it it is CHEATING. Cheats break the rules and therefore must be punished by the rules.

    I have sat back and digested all of what the talking heads have to say - businessmen, lawyers, pundits, fans, idiot politicians - and I cannot reach any other conclusion that what we have here is undoubtedly an absolutely brilliant thing. For once, we have a fantastic opportunity to completely revamp Scottish football for the better. It is simply an opportunity we cannot and must not let pass us by.

    We have an opportunity to destroy the old corrupt ways run by the Glasgow clubs and get back some real football. We have an opportunity to kick out a club which seems to think that it has divine rule in the SPL and has a right to cheat its way into victory and has some sort of right to be in the SPL. We have an opportunity to break an unfair duopoly which has destroyed any competition in the SPL and has hence damaged the game. We have a chance to level things both financially and in football terms. We have a chance to kick out the odious heathen bigotry which has decimated the reputation of our game.

    We have a chance to have a fairer, livelier, more competative league, without the baggage of certain teams having an unfair political, financial and footballing upper hand, and without the disgusting ugly bigotry that seems to come with it.

    I am furious that we have the likes of idiot Salmond mouthing that the game will be better with Rangers than without. Piffle! Our game is suffering *because* of Rangers. Speak to the fans. The only people who want Rangers to stay are Rangers themselves! Everyone else cannot wait to boot them out! All fans' forums of other clubs are bristling with the exact same sentiments being expressed here - and that sentiment is for goodness' sake, kick them out, and good riddance!

    Now let's get that owed cash off them, get them liquidated, block any "phoenix" club from waltzing back in as if nothing has happened and let's get the rules, the cash and the league much fairer and look forward to good, entertaining, competitive football

    Gene
    An excellent post.
    Unfortunately, there are cretins in charge of our game who will ensure that RFC ( in whatever form ) can carry on as normal.

    There will be no radical shake-up of our game, despite opportunity knocking....politicians, SFA, media and SPL will endorse cheating and tax avoidance and the blatant criminal manoeuvering of Craig Whyte.
    He even managed to get his pals appointed as administrators to ensure no creditor even comes close to getting what they are owed.
    RFC will emerge out of this with a host of prospective buyers drooling at the prospect of getting their hands on the club for reletively little and debt free.
    Utterly, utterly sickening.

  22. #1071
    Coaching Staff hibsbollah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    54
    Posts
    36,485
    Quote Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Having sat back and observed for the past few days now the countless stories, the media frenzy and the hundreds of comments posted on here, I just thought I'd fling my tuppence worth in, for all it's worth.

    Rangers have brought this misfortune on themselves entirely by their own doing and therefore should be held fully accountable. For one thing, as a UK taxpayer I am not happy at all that a company has diddled the Government out of at least £50 Million. It is in all our interests to see that this debt is paid back fully for our sakes.

    Like many others who have expressed the same opinion here I believe that what Rangers have done over the past two decades, i.e. spending stupendous amounts of money that didn't exist and refusing to pay their appropriate dues with HMRC in order to gain footballing success is nothing short of a swindle. There is no doubt about it it is CHEATING. Cheats break the rules and therefore must be punished by the rules.

    I have sat back and digested all of what the talking heads have to say - businessmen, lawyers, pundits, fans, idiot politicians - and I cannot reach any other conclusion that what we have here is undoubtedly an absolutely brilliant thing. For once, we have a fantastic opportunity to completely revamp Scottish football for the better. It is simply an opportunity we cannot and must not let pass us by.

    We have an opportunity to destroy the old corrupt ways run by the Glasgow clubs and get back some real football. We have an opportunity to kick out a club which seems to think that it has divine rule in the SPL and has a right to cheat its way into victory and has some sort of right to be in the SPL. We have an opportunity to break an unfair duopoly which has destroyed any competition in the SPL and has hence damaged the game. We have a chance to level things both financially and in football terms. We have a chance to kick out the odious heathen bigotry which has decimated the reputation of our game.

    We have a chance to have a fairer, livelier, more competative league, without the baggage of certain teams having an unfair political, financial and footballing upper hand, and without the disgusting ugly bigotry that seems to come with it.

    I am furious that we have the likes of idiot Salmond mouthing that the game will be better with Rangers than without. Piffle! Our game is suffering *because* of Rangers. Speak to the fans. The only people who want Rangers to stay are Rangers themselves! Everyone else cannot wait to boot them out! All fans' forums of other clubs are bristling with the exact same sentiments being expressed here - and that sentiment is for goodness' sake, kick them out, and good riddance!

    Now let's get that owed cash off them, get them liquidated, block any "phoenix" club from waltzing back in as if nothing has happened and let's get the rules, the cash and the league much fairer and look forward to good, entertaining, competitive football

    Gene
    Great post.

  23. #1072
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    46
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by RossHibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    An excellent post.
    Unfortunately, there are cretins in charge of our game who will ensure that RFC ( in whatever form ) can carry on as normal.

    There will be no radical shake-up of our game, despite opportunity knocking....politicians, SFA, media and SPL will endorse cheating and tax avoidance and the blatant criminal manoeuvering of Craig Whyte.
    He even managed to get his pals appointed as administrators to ensure no creditor even comes close to getting what they are owed.
    RFC will emerge out of this with a host of prospective buyers drooling at the prospect of getting their hands on the club for reletively little and debt free.
    Utterly, utterly sickening.
    I hope not. With the news that the Police are investigating now I'm hoping more and more info starts coming out that makes it too hot for anyone (SPL, SFA, Government, even the media) to attempt to brush over but guess we'll just have to wait and see.

  24. #1073
    Testimonial Due Geo_1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my Joy Division Oven Gloves
    Posts
    4,246
    I'd like to know if RFC have found money down the back of the settee to pay policing costs for this weekends fixture or if Strathclyde polis are taking an IOU.

  25. #1074
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Geo_1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd like to know if RFC have found money down the back of the settee to pay policing costs for this weekends fixture or if Strathclyde polis are taking an IOU.
    The money will come out of the takings. They will make a profit on the game, which will go towards the other creditors.

  26. #1075
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,968
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The money will come out of the takings. They will make a profit on the game, which will go towards the other creditors.
    I'm I right in saying that ST will be valid at Ibrox this Saturday?

    With some 15,000 walk-up's, plus all the catering I would think that they have a few bob in the tin ...

  27. #1076
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by LeithenHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm I right in saying that ST will be valid at Ibrox this Saturday?

    With some 15,000 walk-up's, plus all the catering I would think that they have a few bob in the tin ...
    I think you're right... haven't heard anything to the contrary.

    It makes perfect sense to have the game on. There will be a big gate (supporter solidarity and all that), and a fair chunk will be raised.

  28. #1077
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,968
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think you're right... haven't heard anything to the contrary.

    It makes perfect sense to have the game on. There will be a big gate (supporter solidarity and all that), and a fair chunk will be raised.

    That was my first thoughts when this broke.

    As any other clubs fans would do, rally round and try and make a stance. As much as I loath that lot they will have a huge support this weekend, but it will still not be enough

  29. #1078
    Testimonial Due Geo_1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my Joy Division Oven Gloves
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by LeithenHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That was my first thoughts when this broke.

    As any other clubs fans would do, rally round and try and make a stance. As much as I loath that lot they will have a huge support this weekend, but it will still not be enough
    So basically the police (and RFC) are hoping there is a big enough crowd to cover all expenses. Do you think they'd be so understanding for anybody else?

  30. #1079
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Geo_1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So basically the police (and RFC) are hoping there is a big enough crowd to cover all expenses. Do you think they'd be so understanding for anybody else?
    RFC made assurances to SP that they would be able to cover their costs. They made those assurances on the basis of their expectation of the crowd size. SP obviously took that in good faith.

    If it were anyone else, the police would assess the situation in the same way. The margins might well be tighter, though, and the police might be less convinced.

    It's not about "understanding", it's about commercial realities.

  31. #1080
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Geo_1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So basically the police (and RFC) are hoping there is a big enough crowd to cover all expenses. Do you think they'd be so understanding for anybody else?

    As I have said on many posts before. When WM was trying to take us over I recall many teams supporting us, and Yes, many politicians also. I'm in no way supporting that mob, but I do think they will raise enough money to cover expenses on Saturday...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)