http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8502923.stm
Do you agree with the Minister for Health - Terry should be captain for his footballing ability alone?
Or are you like me and think that a leader can only lead if those who would follow have respect and our leaders behave in such a way as to engender respect?
Is this typical of politicians, or just Labour Politicians, or just men? Or is he a moron?
Results 1 to 27 of 27
-
07-02-2010 01:11 PM #1
Terry's infidelity nothing to do with football?
-
07-02-2010 01:41 PM #2
Considering the amount of Labour MPs who'd like to sack their own captain maybe it'd be better if he minded his own business.
Last edited by Leicester Fan; 07-02-2010 at 01:44 PM.
-
07-02-2010 02:34 PM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-02-2010 02:59 PM #4
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Dont know its too dark in here
- Age
- 67
- Posts
- 12,589
I cant believe for a minute the media found out about his indiscretions before all his mates [and fellow pros] did. He was still the captain.
If the media had been barred from making these revelations, he’d have still been captain.
The actual story only really affects the lives of half a dozen folk or so. The rest of us are just lookers on and what he did or didn’t do isn't really our business.
Now I’d say it was different if it was a politician because they are forever being very moralistic and telling us what we can and cannot do … for our own good of course.Space to let
-
07-02-2010 03:02 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-02-2010 03:31 PM #6
The rest of the football world is laughing at English hypocrisy and prudishness.
-
07-02-2010 03:49 PM #7
nothing to do with football? tell that to Wayne Bridge. the truth is that this is far more complicated than your average "****ging about" story because of who he was ****ging about with.
if one of my friends did this to another friend in my old 5's team they'd of been an outcast, thrown out the team. thats got nothing to do with prudishness or hypocrisy but basic solidarity inherent in true friendship, and standards.
really Terry should probably have resigned the captaincy (and maybe even retired from international football for a period) on that basis without being forced to.
-
07-02-2010 04:00 PM #8
Is it true he was selling tours of the Chelsea training ground for £10k a go or was that all mince?
-
07-02-2010 04:11 PM #9
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- from the mountains
- Posts
- 4,688
- Gamer IDs
-
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Not that I am really fussed either way but I don't think he should have been relieved of the England captaincy. If it was affecting his ability to do the job, then yes but Capello wouldn't have been able to know this until the next England game came about.
But anything to scupper England's World Cup attempt is fine by me!
-
07-02-2010 04:54 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-02-2010 05:13 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Footballers are no different. JT and WB will have to deal with it.
-
07-02-2010 06:15 PM #12
Does anyone think John Terry would have any chance of getting near the sort of women he is bedding if he wasn't a footballer?
My guess is he would have a very large Rohypnol bill if he was to have any chance at all.
-
07-02-2010 06:59 PM #13
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 5,253
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Although, to be fair, he was giving the portion of money he earned to his charity IIRC. The guy who set it up also took a few k fee for arranging through Terry though.
Other than it being a major security risk () at least he wasn't keeping the money.
-
07-02-2010 07:02 PM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-02-2010 07:11 PM #15This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
07-02-2010 07:51 PM #17
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 5,253
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I only read what was reported...
I think they would have been more inclined to say he spent it on prossies and coke if that's what they thought he was doing. Maybe he was buying gifts for Bridges missus
-
07-02-2010 09:25 PM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-02-2010 09:46 PM #19
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 5,253
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We all know that clubs don't really give a **** if it means that they don't lose money in any way, whether that being a player or sponsorship/gate receipts.
-
08-02-2010 01:00 PM #20
Odd headline to the Chelsea item on the BBC webpage....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport
-
08-02-2010 01:44 PM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Oh, that made me laugh! Bring back Mrs Merton!
Although I think that JT is an absolute sh*t for what he's done, I don't think people should be sacked for sha**ing around. Can you imagine getting sacked from your job because your boss found out you'd cheated on your wife/gf - you'd take them to the cleaners, and rightly so.
(NB not sure why all the sympathy is going to Bridge, he's not even with the woman - is this a male thing? It's Terry's missus I feel sorry for)
-
08-02-2010 02:19 PM #22
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 5,253
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-02-2010 09:30 PM #23
I'm not sure that comparisons with getting the sack from your work are fair, tbh.
He is still going to be first pick for CH. It's just his leadership role that has been taken from him.
Think about all the people he'd have to meet, dinners to go to, functions to attend, promotional material, kid's days, charity days etc etc as the main man in English Football. All the while the tabloids are screaming blue murder about his betrayal of his wife and kids.
I just don't understand the defence of him or his captaincy...
-
09-02-2010 12:16 AM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-02-2010 02:15 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I reckon he got a bollocking from the co. and they invented the charity story to douse the fire, preventing further damage to the 'Cheslki' brand....
Never mind, eh Abrahmovic?
-
09-02-2010 05:03 PM #26
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 82
- Posts
- 14,516
Capello is no mug-he knows it would have been a continuing distraction and as he doesn't give a monkey's who the captain is he gave him the elbow.As far as Capello is concerned what he says is to happen on the field happens -he doesn't need a captain to carry out his plans because if a player doesn't do what he's told he's out.
-
09-02-2010 10:05 PM #27This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think the captains role in a team has been diluted in recent years. All they really do is become sort sort of public face of the team. They toss coins and lift trophies if need be. You could argue that they bark orders and motivate players but there are four or five other "captains" in that England team who do that job already without the armband.
Far from being "crass", it was a decisive and assertive move that shows whos boss...and that the boss's personal principles and beliefs should be respected if you wan't to maintain your position in the England team.
Makes a change from Sven who probably would have let Terry keep the armband.....and then check up on this bird just to make sure she was OK.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks