Some unpublicised information on the swine flu pandemic/vaccine

[(((Fergus)))]

Recently received this interesting, but rather long (54 mins), video concerning several peculiarities about the current swine flu "pandemic" and vaccine. All information has been published - discreetly - in the mainstream media and specialist medical press but I hadn't heard about most of it until now.

The speaker (Sister Teresa Forcades) is a Roman Catholic nun who is a doctor of internal medicine with a PhD in Public Health. The video is in Spanish with English subtitles.



Thankfully, someone has extracted the salient points and compiled them in English (4 pages):

http://www.slideshare.net/guest0a4bd...ation-on-h1-n1

[Minder]

Watched this on ATS a few days ago, certainly makes you think. Check out the stories on Ukraine deaths.

[Twa Cairpets]

More partially informed anti-vaccination propaganda Fergus. As before, with your friends on this side of the argument, expounding these anti-vax views is a seriously dangerous route to go down. Belief in your other little foibles like homeopathy will only hurt you, and is laughable. Belief in this will kill people.

Where shall we start.

I'll pick a few at random

Novelty 2 - adjuvants: "Some claim that the H1N1 vaccine contains adjuvants, such as aluminum salts, AS03 or MF59 (aka squalene). After initial efficacy testing, however, the CDC determined that an adjuvant would not be required. Therefore, all forms of the H1N1 vaccine in the United States are adjuvant-free."

"Infected vaccine" - the footnote (no.9) gives a perfectly reasonable explanation, which would tend to be supported by the evidence insofar as thousands of people havent died from the vaccine.

Page 2 - para 2: Well, isn't it easy to be clever in retrospect. The evidence the woman refers to is evidence taken after the fact. At the time, if the WHO seem worried enough to consider taking it to the level of alert they did, I'd prefer (as they did) err on the side of caution rather than having millions of people dying a horrible death. i'm surprised why you wouldnt.

"Existing immunological recognition in the population" - This is correct. A large number of over 60's have an immunity to the strain because it has been around in a form before that developed immunity in those infected. Incidentally, hundreds of thousands - in fact millions - of people died in the pandemics of the 50's.