What gets me is how the narrative from the media for the Celtic one was that it couldn't be conclusively proven that it was over the line and that because of the angle it could appear to be over when it actually wasn't. Meaning the onfield decision should stand. Now with this one for Rangers there's no mention of it needing to be proven conclusively, the angle making it look more over than it is or that VAR shouldn't overrule the onfield decision.

I think what it does prove conclusively is that the media side with the big 2 Glasgow teams, even if it means there's a contradiction.

I think both the Celtic and Rangers ones were over so the officials got the 1st one right and Saturday's wrong. Whether or not Rocky was fouled is a different matter and tbh I don't see much of a push. Looks like 2 players jostling but I'll gladly take one in our favour. I expect it will be a long time before we get another against them, with many iffy ones going their way in the meantime.