Quote Originally Posted by HarpOnHibee View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This bill does not allow a man to simply state that he feels like a woman today, just so he can legally access female spaces in order to commit illegal acts (which would be a pointless course of action anyway). If you had taken the time to actually read the bill, you would have been fully aware of this.

Once again, it's hyperbole that has been stirred up by an anti-progressive Conservative press that is completely baseless and out of touch with the reality of the situation.
It let's him change by living as a woman for 3 months. No checks or definitions on what this means. His birth certificate can be changed and no one can check this if he doesn't want them to.

I don't think this will enable more sex offenders. But women can have the protection from that if they feel they need it, almost all sex offenses are committed by men and the vast majority of trans women don't have and medical procedures

I think bigger than the worry of sexual offences is the right of women to have female only spaces. Women should have the choice to stay in domestic abuse homes or go to rape crisis centres without biological males there. Disabled woman like the woman a few pages back, should have the right of female biological care.

The defenders say gra doesn't change anything but it's a nonsense as argued well here
https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2022/05/20/the-potential-for-gra-reform-to-affect-who-can-access-single-sex-services-briefing-for-msps/

I'd be happy for all right for trans people bar a few caveats, I reckon 90% are the same. Hopefully going forward unisex toilets and changing facilities are a standard in new builds. I'd also hope for more money pumped in to support trans people have their own rape crisis ect, so women can have their own. Having a wife and daughters who could be affected by this perhaps sways my thinking