Quote Originally Posted by One Day Soon View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That's odd because the bit you quoted was 'our people' not 'impoverish'. Maybe you were trying to imply something else about our people. Who knows?

You should probably read the Growth Commission report which straight up admits the structural deficit is real, meaning independence puts us in the position of cutting public services or raising taxes dramatically - or both - just to stand still. It deals with Scotland's position because we're not Norway. This isn't No propaganda, its a report written by the SNP's own former parliamentary finance spokesman.

I was highly entertained by the former SNP members on twitter sharing the emails they had received from SNP HQ immediately after the stunt, asking them to rejoin the Party. Including those who, under GDPR, almost certainly should not have been on any list or be receiving any emails. It was an amazing coincidence that the spontaneous walk out by the SNP was accompanied by a well co-ordinated request to lapsed and resigned members to rejoin. What are the odds on that?

You appear to be confusing me with someone who supports the current version of Labour or indeed Corbyn. That would be hilariously inaccurate. And as I've posted previously he has something like 500,000 members and it's doing him **** all good - good luck with the 'extra' 5000 odd.
Not true actually. The GC recommendation is to increase public spending by 0.5% below the growth rate. The IFS commentary on this assumed a growth rate of 1.5% and therefore an annual increase of 1%. Obv other growth rates are possible in either direction.

As I see it the likely choices are a decade of something like or not much better than austerity followed by at least some hope of improvement or a decade of something like or not much better than austerity followed by near certain ongoing decline.