Six clubs have voiced serious concerns over the governance of the SPFL
https://planetradio.co.uk/clyde/sport/football-news/six-premiership-clubs-criticise-spfl/
I wonder why we've not put our name to this? Scared we wouldn't get SPFL approval for BK investment?
Results 1 to 13 of 13
Thread: SPFL Governance
-
08-02-2024 10:24 AM #1
SPFL Governance
-
08-02-2024 10:26 AM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-02-2024 10:27 AM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-02-2024 10:27 AM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-02-2024 02:09 PM #5
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Location
- Dunfermline/London
- Posts
- 2,208
Rangers are on the list so that would rule me out of anything said straight away even if its reasonable complaints which it wont be.
-
08-02-2024 02:52 PM #6
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 81
- Posts
- 13,828
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-02-2024 05:25 PM #7
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 2,099
Would like a bit more depth on this. Who is the one club who had an opportunity to input into the report’s investigation. The obvious guess is Celtic which leads onto the next question.
Why have Hibs, Hearts, Kilmarnock, Ross County and the two Dundee clubs not signed this letter? Why no lower league clubs?
The two clubs i trust the least are Celtic and Rangers by a long shot. Im also still not over Aberdeens failure to change the voting structure. The fact that only one of the old firm has come out with this doesn’t help me know where to stand 😂
-
08-02-2024 06:58 PM #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 10,535
Rangers spearheading this, probably claiming it's for the good of the game. That's when alarm bells go off for me as it's always a signal that it's for the good of Rangers, not everyone else.
Article references they've been leading calls for change since the cinch sponsorship fallout. They been at it longer than that, they've been after Doncaster since ever since they were formed after oldco went pop. The Covid (non) smoking gun fiasco was all about trying to get rid of him. I'm pretty sure the cinch deal had to get reduced because of them meaning it cost all the SPFL clubs money.
For all the flaws of the current SPFL set up, instinct tells me we're better off as we are if Rangers are pushing for change.
-
08-02-2024 07:56 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Although this whole episode has me frankly baffled and I don’t know what has happened, who has an axe to grind or why.
It just seems like a storm in a tea cup, some angry noises, the odd statement and some incompetent and opaque administrator obfuscating.
-
08-02-2024 08:21 PM #10
rangers and celtic only care about whats best for them, their sole aim is to do better than the other one and not give a **** about rest of scotland, they do what they want and get away with it.
Lets be honest apart from a cup win now and then the rest of clubs are playing for what? 3rd placeLess talk, more gifs. 21.05.16
-
08-02-2024 08:30 PM #11
- Join Date
- Feb 2024
- Posts
- 387
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
10-02-2024 07:56 AM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
10-02-2024 09:45 AM #13This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Which makes your point even more relevant.Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks