hibs.net Messageboard

 

Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3111213
Results 361 to 367 of 367
  1. #361
    Quote Originally Posted by JimBHibees View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    no need to apologise nothing wrong with your memory remembering the last time we got a decision against Rangers.
    I can do better than that, I remember we got a few on that momentous day in May 2016


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #362
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Fezziwig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The gain from Ryan going for the ball the way he did was winning the ball when Sevco were attacking near our box. Aribo was chasing the ball down so simply collecting the ball and stepping out wasn't an option.
    He could easily have got the ball without any danger of giving away a foul. Easily. Going in hard and fair and making a statement is all very well.. not when itís at risk of being sent off.

    A previous poster was insisting Aribo wasnít close enough to the incident for it to be a dangerous tackle. Iíd be interested to hear if they think Ryan couldnít have just collected the ball.

  4. #363
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    10,544
    Quote Originally Posted by WeeRussell View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He could easily have got the ball without any danger of giving away a foul. Easily. Going in hard and fair and making a statement is all very well.. not when itís at risk of being sent off.

    A previous poster was insisting Aribo wasnít close enough to the incident for it to be a dangerous tackle. Iíd be interested to hear if they think Ryan couldnít have just collected the ball.
    The reason that Porteous got to the ball long before Aribo got to Porteous is the speed at which Porteous slid into the ball. Had he stayed on his feet then it would have been 50-50 at best, with no cover behind Porteous if Aribo got the first touch. And any contact under those circumstances would have been a stonewall booking.

    Look at the Lundstrum two footed lunge on Doig in the same game, which Walsh didn't even think was a foul - let alone a risk of a sending off.
    Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.

  5. #364
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    6,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyrie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The reason that Porteous got to the ball long before Aribo got to Porteous is the speed at which Porteous slid into the ball. Had he stayed on his feet then it would have been 50-50 at best, with no cover behind Porteous if Aribo got the first touch. And any contact under those circumstances would have been a stonewall booking.

    Look at the Lundstrum two footed lunge on Doig in the same game, which Walsh didn't even think was a foul - let alone a risk of a sending off.
    Yup, the two footed lunge which wiped out Doig and he'd have known he'd be taking out Doig as well as getting the ball.

  6. #365
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    10,544
    Quote Originally Posted by 007 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yup, the two footed lunge which wiped out Doig and he'd have known he'd be taking out Doig as well as getting the ball.
    And which the compliance officer has chosen to ignore, despite Porteous having his appeal dismissed for a similar incident.

    Further evidence of an officiating bias in favour of the Ugly Sisters.
    Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.

  7. #366
    @hibs.net private member Alfred E Newman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    The back of beyond
    Posts
    6,113
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyrie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    And which the compliance officer has chosen to ignore, despite Porteous having his appeal dismissed for a similar incident.

    Further evidence of an officiating bias in favour of the Ugly Sisters.
    As usual the problem is our constant lack of sympathy and support within the media.
    Rangers and Celtic, Hearts and Aberdeen dominate on that front. Even St Johnstone and Motherwell have it through Cowan and Cosgrove.
    If Sundays game had been shown live on Sky we might have had a chance of a fairer deal but with the match only being shown on Rangers tv , it is only Rangers and some Hibs fans who have seen the full game and of course the Sportscene highlights program incredibly ,though predictably ,saw no need to even mention the Doig incident.
    If they had it may have forced the compliance officer to get involved.
    I have shown the lunge footage to several people this week, Rangers supporters included, and they were all amazed that Lundstrum was not even spoken to.
    Unfortunately I canít see any sign of our PR with the media improving any time soon, its been that way for years.

  8. #367
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    41,608
    Aribo yesterday....referee must have been unsighted

    Last edited by cabbageandribs1875; 17-10-2021 at 01:48 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)