https://twitter.com/hibbysmurf/status
/1444772480594456584?s=21
Results 61 to 90 of 356
Thread: Porto: Negative Press
-
-
04-10-2021 11:16 AM #62This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:17 AM #63This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The thing is, the most likely destination for Porto would traditionally be England. Another reason why Gerrard is such a ****bag is because he is so respected down there, clubs could be listening to his slavering vendetta against Porto, and looking elsewhere as a result. Gerrard's obsession with him could be having a negative impact on his career. Hibs need to be calling Gerrard out for the p.o.s that he his.
-
-
04-10-2021 11:18 AM #65This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:18 AM #66This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:18 AM #67This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:24 AM #68
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,869
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:24 AM #69
- Join Date
- Apr 2016
- Posts
- 2,156
Funny how Gerrard has forgotten some of his more....'choice' challenges
-
04-10-2021 11:34 AM #70
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,869
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:34 AM #71This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:53 AM #72This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hibs fans can do that without the club getting involved anyway.
It wouldn't achieve anything though. Large parts of the press and SFA would happily have let Rangers join the top league after they went bust. The Old Firm come first,and second and third and fourth in the list of priorities, the rest of us are just here to make up the numbers. They couldnae care less about our grievances, especially if they’re against Rangers or Celtc.
-
04-10-2021 11:53 AM #73
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Posts
- 790
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 11:56 AM #74
If Porteous goes off for his then this is a red card. Off the ground and studs up
https://twitter.com/scottyhibs/statu...429178880?s=21
-
-
-
04-10-2021 12:03 PM #77This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 12:04 PM #78This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
-
04-10-2021 12:04 PM #79
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Location
- Dunfermline/London
- Posts
- 2,208
That and the Barasic challenge. Aribo, the dives. C'mon Hibs stand up for the club.
-
04-10-2021 12:22 PM #80This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
From the one angle available i think there is a case for a red card under the present system.
Lunging into the tackle with both feet off the ground and like the Porteous one it intimidates the opposing player causing him to take evasive action.
Only thing that makes it look better is that he accurately blocks the ball whereas Porteous misses the ball with his front foot and keeps travelling at speed.
Neither Cliff nor Pat seemed to notice it on the commentary.Last edited by CMurdoch; 04-10-2021 at 12:27 PM.
-
04-10-2021 12:26 PM #81
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 998
While I wouldn’t want Ron Gordon to speak it’s time for Ross to grow a pair and back his players .
Hughes calling Boyle diver no defence of player then Goodwin calling Porteous a diver no defence of the player .
It’s time he came out with not seen the replay yet but where I was in the dugout it looked like a penalty / not a sending off .
Later on he could be saying Porteous was not a sending off and there was a worse tackle on Doig.
Time he got street wise
-
04-10-2021 12:27 PM #82This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Can Hibs report this to the SFA/Compliance officer ..?
-
-
04-10-2021 12:28 PM #84
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Location
- Dunfermline/London
- Posts
- 2,208
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 12:33 PM #85This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You say porteous isn't "really being slaughtered".. well unfortunately he is. He has been for months and has developed a bad reputation because of 1 awful tackle against the same team. As a result this narrative has been allowed to grow and grow and we continue to stay quiet.
Lundstram's tackle on Doig was far worse but if you do a search for that online you can barely find any comments on it. Why? Because the focus is on Porto and everyone is turning a blind eye to any other goings on in the match - I'd like to of seen us raise Lundstram's tackle to the public and trade some blows with Rangers over this but we stayed quiet..
-
04-10-2021 12:34 PM #86This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 12:39 PM #87
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Posts
- 790
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 12:41 PM #88This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
For what it's worth, can any of you imagine the Neil Lennon post match reaction after this if he was still in charge...
-
04-10-2021 12:44 PM #89This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-10-2021 12:48 PM #90
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Posts
- 790
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks