Disgrace

[Kato]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Surely the double standards on display is much worse than any naivety from Porteous?

That's the main thing for me. No way have the rules been applied equally.



Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

[brog]

I thought it may help this debate if I showed the actual Law of The Game.

If an offence involves contact it is penalised by a direct free kick or penalty kick.

• Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed
• Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned
• Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off.

IMO the middle ground would have been the most sensible course of action. A case could be made for the softer alternative but (despite Gerrard's ranting) I really never saw Aribo's safety being endangered. I think we all know what would have happened if the roles had been reversed.
Interestingly, although our "knowledgeable" Sportscene pundits (& others) continually talk about the speed of the tackle, there is no reference to it in the Laws. It's obviously essential to tackle in slow motion vs the Uglies!

[WHAM]

Hibs need to man the ****** up and call this out.

Whether or not Porteous’ challenge was a red or not, we should be asking why the blatant fouls against our players were not treated the same by the referee.

We all know the answer. But just quietly accepting it makes us look timid as hell.

[Andy74]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

That would be a decent argument if the Rangers player hadn't already tackled Doig in exactly the same manner and not even have a foul given against him.

Surely the double standards on display is much worse than any naivety from Porteous?

The one on Doig is a proper two feet in the air lunge.

[Kato]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The one on Doig is a proper two feet in the air lunge.

Yes, he gives the referee a decision to make and he promptly does nowt.

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

[Weegreenman]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I thought it may help this debate if I showed the actual Law of The Game.

If an offence involves contact it is penalised by a direct free kick or penalty kick.

• Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed
• Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned
• Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off.

IMO the middle ground would have been the most sensible course of action. A case could be made for the softer alternative but (despite Gerrard's ranting) I really never saw Aribo's safety being endangered. I think we all know what would have happened if the roles had been reversed.
Interestingly, although our "knowledgeable" Sportscene pundits (& others) continually talk about the speed of the tackle, there is no reference to it in the Laws. It's obviously essential to tackle in slow motion vs the Uglies!

Had Porto caught Aribo, he’d have snapped his leg in two.
Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.
Your allowed to have an opinion but quite a few on here are touched by the green specs and are afraid of a backlash if they go against the narrative.

Porto let us down yesterday and cost us three points. It’s clear as day. I’ve watched it several times.
We need to have better team game management if we want to win in Glasgow. School boy stuff from Porto in my opinion after being wound up by Morelos.

[Heisenberg]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Had Porto caught Aribo, he’d have snapped his leg in two.
Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.
Your allowed to have an opinion but quite a few on here are touched by the green specs and are afraid of a backlash if they go against the narrative.

Porto let us down yesterday and cost us three points. It’s clear as day. I’ve watched it several times.
We need to have better team game management if we want to win in Glasgow. School boy stuff from Porto in my opinion after being wound up by Morelos.

Had Lundstram properly caught Doig in the first 5 minutes he could’ve broken his leg. Where was his red card?

[HibsGW]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I don’t even think he’d have sent another Hibs player off for it.

Agree with this, he was only sent off because it’s Porteous. The easiest way to see that it’s a ridiculous decision is that every single one of us knows that if a Rangers player makes that challenge, you aren’t even getting a foul, and I am not making any exaggeration when I say that.

[lord bunberry]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The sheer volume of “Hibs” fans lining up to tell us Porto should know better and he deserved the red card today is mind boggling.

I don’t post here often, I find it the Hibs Uber club at times, however, we were winning at Ibrox and had a man given a straight red. Not just any lad, a lad with a rep for getting stuck in against this lot. A lad who Gerrard and his pals have called out previously. …

This was a scandalous example of why this league is the biggest joke in European football. You aren’t allowed to win, and you ain’t even allowed a ticket to watch your team get the shaft. Why do we bother…

Another example of the Scottish football cesspit. Fair play to those of you who keep going…

[Bangkok Hibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'm sick of people like you saying this, and folk saying he gave the ref a decision to make, no he didnt. Ryan Porteous made a perfectly legal challenge and the cheating ******* ref decided to send him off because his team were going to lose.

Cheat, i hate him and those bigoted ****.

Absolutely. The Hun apologists on here need to have a word with themselves. So every team must be on their best behaviour and play safe football at Greyskull just in case a bigot referee sniffs a chance to get the cards out? ****ing laughable!

[BegbieHSC]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Had Porto caught Aribo, he’d have snapped his leg in two.
Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.
Your allowed to have an opinion but quite a few on here are touched by the green specs and are afraid of a backlash if they go against the narrative.

Porto let us down yesterday and cost us three points. It’s clear as day. I’ve watched it several times.
We need to have better team game management if we want to win in Glasgow. School boy stuff from Porto in my opinion after being wound up by Morelos.

1. Hyperbolic nonsense.

2. Bots? Really?

[blackpoolhibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Yes, he gives the referee a decision to make and he promptly does nowt.

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

Exactly, the only reason Ryan was sent off is because we were winning comfortably, and that corrupt cheat needed to do something to help the huns.

[Pagan Hibernia]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Had Porto caught Aribo, he’d have snapped his leg in two.
Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.
Your allowed to have an opinion but quite a few on here are touched by the green specs and are afraid of a backlash if they go against the narrative.

Porto let us down yesterday and cost us three points. It’s clear as day. I’ve watched it several times.
We need to have better team game management if we want to win in Glasgow. School boy stuff from Porto in my opinion after being wound up by Morelos.

ok, even if the challenge was as dangerous as you claim, do you believe if it was committed by a player in blue yesterday then the red would have come out?

that’s the issue.

[flash]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Had Porto caught Aribo, he’d have snapped his leg in two.
Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.
Your allowed to have an opinion but quite a few on here are touched by the green specs and are afraid of a backlash if they go against the narrative.

Porto let us down yesterday and cost us three points. It’s clear as day. I’ve watched it several times.
We need to have better team game management if we want to win in Glasgow. School boy stuff from Porto in my opinion after being wound up by Morelos.

Thats strange because the more I watch it the less of a red card it gets.
Aribo goes down and stays down despite there being no contact whatsoever.
It's not even a foul.

[brog]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

1. Hyperbolic nonsense.

2. Bots? Really?

Beat me to it! Anyway if Porto didn't catch him as the OP is suggesting then why was Aribo rolling about in pretend agony? If you watch it, Aribo hits the ground, has a sneaky wee look then starts rolling about. Shameful!

[Feed McGraw]

Can you not be booked for simulation anywhere but the penalty box ? Aribo & Barisic both yellows for ( in Barisic`s case a foul too ) simulation surely ? Simulating that they are injured, cheating, just like diving in the box is - accepted it`s hard to prove, will VAR look at things like that ? Also, if a Rangers player makes a tackle like Porto`s it`s cheered to the rafters, followed by a sectarian song with not even a foul given. I don`t think it was a foul anyway, but there`ll be some new rule somewhere to say it is I`m sure. Ach, I think like many of us, I`m just sickened, especially the treatment of our superb young player at the hands of that vile club and the media. Disgrace, as the thread title says.

[Allez Hibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.

I really don't think so.

It wasn't even a foul.

[hibbysam]

The only angle that shows exactly what happened is the one from the stand opposite the main stand. All other angles don’t show what happened. That one shows the exact height of the tackle, the distance from Aribo, the no contact, the slide rather than the jump. No way could anyone look at that angle and say ‘red card’. Sl

[FilipinoHibs]

Nick Walsh born in Govan teaches at a Beardsen school.

[Bangkok Hibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Thats strange because the more I watch it the less of a red card it gets.
Aribo goes down and stays down despite there being no contact whatsoever.
It's not even a foul.

100% not even a foul....(in many other games at many other grounds) that's the problem with this corrupt league.

[h185forever]

Sent to the Strathclyde Fu****s Asscoiation


Can you please take a look at the tackle 2:30 into the rangers v hibs game at the weekend and help me understand why this did not receive the same punishment as the Porteous tackle on Aribo later in the same game ? The main difference being this tackle actually made contact.

Would it be possible for you to pinpoint the sniper that must have hit Aribo as the aforesaid Porteous made no contact with him ... I thought simulation was an offence in any part of the field play?


P..S. I'm not questioning the awarded red just the "inconsistency".

I don't expect a reply .....but it would be good to fill their mailbox

[Bangkok Hibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Had Porto caught Aribo, he’d have snapped his leg in two.
Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.
Your allowed to have an opinion but quite a few on here are touched by the green specs and are afraid of a backlash if they go against the narrative.

Porto let us down yesterday and cost us three points. It’s clear as day. I’ve watched it several times.
We need to have better team game management if we want to win in Glasgow. School boy stuff from Porto in my opinion after being wound up by Morelos.

Never been called a bot before but straight back at you...your the one talking nonsense.

[Eyrie]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Had Porto caught Aribo, he’d have snapped his leg in two.
Your talking nonsense like most of the other Bots on this forum.
Your allowed to have an opinion but quite a few on here are touched by the green specs and are afraid of a backlash if they go against the narrative.

Porto let us down yesterday and cost us three points. It’s clear as day. I’ve watched it several times.
We need to have better team game management if we want to win in Glasgow. School boy stuff from Porto in my opinion after being wound up by Morelos.

If you bother to look at the incident Porteous would have had to slow down considerably to catch Aribo.

And you'll see that it was Aribo's trailing left foot that caught the back of Porteous' right knee, so Porteous' feet were well past the point of contact. Freeze frame it 45 seconds into the BBC clip of the incident.

Porteous was reckless in winning the ball, which is a yellow card according to the laws of the game.

[Kato]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

And you'll see that it was Aribo's trailing left foot that caught the back of Porteous' right knee.

This angle suggests there was zero contact.

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheRyanMc...958846980?s=19



Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

[Peevemor]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

This angle suggests there was zero contact.

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheRyanMc...958846980?s=19



Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

Does Ryan's left boot maybe catch Aribo's right foot, while at the same time his other foot catches Ryan's right knee?

[Kato]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Does Ryan's left boot maybe catch Aribo's right foot, while at the same time his other foot catches Ryan's right knee?

Looks like Aribo steps over both RP's lower legs. Possibility of a slight brush, possibility of no contact.

What I can say it's a slide in rather than a two-footed lunge and there is far less contact than the tackle on Doig.

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

[Eyrie]

Attempting to attach a screen shot here. if it works, it shows Aribo's right foot is safely past Porteous and his left catches/is caught by Porteous.

BBC Porteous Aribo.jpg