Quote Originally Posted by He's here! View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Pretty sure it's a similar situation with the attorney general in England.

There was a lot of debate during the Salmond/Sturgeon saga (part two coming to court at a yet to be confirmed date ) about whether being head of the crown office can sit comfortably alongside being the government's chief legal officer. I do think there's an argument for the roles to be split.

As for the 'Rangers' case, I note that Wolffe acknowledged that the prosecution of Duff and Phelps as being "motivated by malice". What does that actually mean?
It doesn't mean what you and i would expect it to mean.
There is another thread on hibs.net discussing it after the apology was made, from memory it's on the Holy ground part of the forum..