hibs.net Messageboard

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 33 of 33
  1. #31
    @hibs.net private member Kato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    on the moon, howling
    Age
    63
    Posts
    14,658
    Quote Originally Posted by CMurdoch View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It would have been the same if it was Hibs,
    I doubt that very much.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Kato View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I doubt that very much.
    Fortunately, we will never know

  4. #33
    @hibs.net private member Kato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    on the moon, howling
    Age
    63
    Posts
    14,658
    Quote Originally Posted by CMurdoch View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Fortunately, we will never know
    Very true. What we do know is the narrative they tried to build about Hibs during the "unfair to Hearts" summer special editions last year - which was Hibs were out of order "getting rid of the youth" programme - Aberdeen signing players was reported as normal, Hibs signing players was reported as "how dare they".

    While I don't think they are as bad in reporting Hibs as they were, the bias is still there. The amount of Hearts related pundits on there shows where things lay with them, I mean Craig Levein on criticising the way Hearts have gone over the last few seasons is done with very little sense of irony.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)