Any ideas who queen flump’s 16 backers were? How many PL clubs were in the 16? Any ideas?
Results 1 to 29 of 29
Thread: Who are the 16
-
15-06-2020 10:18 PM #1
Who are the 16
-
15-06-2020 10:27 PM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-06-2020 11:46 AM #3
If I was a mischievous PR employee of Hearts I would release a statement thanking Hibs for their support. All hell would break loose on here 😁
-
16-06-2020 11:54 AM #4
Let Keekback work it out for themselves. They are talking about an FOI request They want the clubs who voted against to be outed in a McCoist type of way so they can deny them the Maroon Pound. 😂
-
16-06-2020 11:59 AM #5
Deans says that how each club "voted" should be made public as he can't believe there were only 16 'yes's - he expected arund 30.
He's basically accusing Doncaster & the SPFL board of lying.
Hardly promoting peace, love & unity is he?
-
16-06-2020 12:00 PM #6
Hearts latest statement....
"We would like the thank the fifteen clubs that supported us by backing the reorganization proposal.
We will now demonstrate our gratitude by taking you all to court for every penny you've got."
-
16-06-2020 05:57 PM #7
Six of them are easy.
Hearts, Partick and Stranraer voted yes to promote themselves back into the division they had just been relegated from.
Inverness, Falkirk and Edinburgh City voted yes to promote themselves into a division that they hadn't yet qualified for.
So out of thirty six clubs, only ten (just over a quarter) voted for 14-10-10-10 without having any immediate self interest in doing so.Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
16-06-2020 06:00 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-06-2020 06:03 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Still though, it’s the famous we’re talking about. How could we possibly not have them in the top league. Gorgie rules, God Save The Queen, hello hello etc.
-
16-06-2020 07:17 PM #10
Hamilton and Peterhead voted for reconstruction
Sent from my SM-G390F using Tapatalk
-
-
16-06-2020 07:42 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-06-2020 07:57 PM #13
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 10,534
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-06-2020 06:54 AM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
17-06-2020 07:03 AM #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 2,227
Was there an actual vote or was it just a sounding out by Doncaster ? If more than two SPL clubs indicated no then the game was up.
-
17-06-2020 07:04 AM #17
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 5,029
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-06-2020 07:49 AM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Like Leslie Deans, I’m surprised they didn’t get more support. I thought more clubs would vote in favour, in the full knowledge it would fail anyway but they could claim they were showing solidarity with Hearts.
I guess most clubs didn’t care to give even the appearance of supporting Budge. It’s pretty humiliating for her.
-
-
17-06-2020 09:16 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-06-2020 09:39 PM #21
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Posts
- 510
The SJ guru overby now adamant that 12 clubs abstained, guess what they once again are lapping him up!!🤣🤣
-
18-06-2020 09:49 PM #22
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 10,534
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
In reality, it doesn't matter because there weren't enough votes. Don't think they do reality though.
-
18-06-2020 10:02 PM #23
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 1,153
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-06-2020 10:08 PM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-06-2020 10:10 PM #25
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Musselburgh
- Posts
- 3,596
It was an indicative vote, not a formal, binding one iiirc. Abstentions can be taken as not in favour.
-
18-06-2020 10:11 PM #26This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Just looked at their site, and they mention 16 not in favour, but not the 26. That seems to be a media assumption.
-
18-06-2020 10:22 PM #27
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,441
Abstentions in this case are taken as being No’s effectively, so wouldn’t matter if every club but the 16 Abstained, it’s still have been a rejection of the plan.
-
18-06-2020 10:51 PM #28
The suggestion is 9 of 12 top flight clubs voted against it.
We know that Livingston and Hamilton votes in favour.
The suggestion is Rangers voted against it. You have to laugh and even warm to the teddy bears. They are a total disgrace but the best bit is the total inconsistency on anything they do. One minute the are aligned almost in bed with Hearts and then the minute the SPFL investigation doesn’t go anywhere or the colts proposal is knocked back they drop the jambos like a stone.
So even if Celtic were the 3rd club to vote for it - they will now see the losers as enemy no 1 given the threats on starting football and carnage this could cause domestically and at European game level.
-
19-06-2020 09:42 AM #29
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 1,153
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks