SFA to follow USA in banning kids from heading the ball

[Cataplana]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You would think that the scientists and charities would be all over this. Much more of a link than heading a football I would suggest. I’ve had another look and the top 10 per head of population is:

Finland
USA
Canada
Iceland
Sweden
Switzerland
Norway
Denmark
Netherlands
Belgium

Apart from Switzerland as an outlier the rest are all geographically clustered and have large coastal boundaries.

Perhaps they have been, and have decided there is no significance.

One thing that jumped out at me from one of the sources I looked at (https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-highest-rates-of-deaths-from-dementia.html) is that deaths from dementia are being compared. The differences may be due to what is recorded on the death certificate.

Anyway, in respect of heading the ball, I think that if there is a proven increase in risk, it makes sense to pull back from kids heading the ball.

[davhibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Perhaps they have been, and have decided there is no significance.

One thing that jumped out at me from one of the sources I looked at (https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-highest-rates-of-deaths-from-dementia.html) is that deaths from dementia are being compared. The differences may be due to what is recorded on the death certificate.

Anyway, in respect of heading the ball, I think that if there is a proven increase in risk, it makes sense to pull back from kids heading the ball.

Your point about what is being recorded is probably not far off. I’d guess that it seems to be more prevalent in western countries because that’s where people will know more about it. In less advanced countries people won’t have the same knowledge of dementia

[Carheenlea]

Where will the David Grays of tomorrow learn the beautiful art of bulleting home cup winning, Hun deflating injury time goals?

[DetroitHibs]

The games gone down hill since they outlawed proper tackling and this VAR nonsense. Take away heading or kids being taught how to head the ball and the game will just continue to decline even further.

[danhibees1875]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Where will the David Grays of tomorrow learn the beautiful art of bulleting home cup winning, Hun deflating injury time goals?

In the under 13s.

I think it seems to be a good move. There's a link that shows footballers are X times more likely to suffer from the disease than not and I would assume the damage is more likely to be done at younger ages (guesswork) while brains and bones develop and strengthen so may as well protect them when young.

If it all fails, what's the worst that's happened? We've spent too much time focusing on passing the ball on the ground.

I find the English FA response quite strange. They're saying there isn't enough evidence to ban it yet. That sounds to me like there isn't enough evidence to not ban it either. Surely the sensible solution at that point is to ban it until there's evidence to show it isn't an issue and then reintroduce it.

[Brightside]

If they arent going to ban it its pretty silly to say no heading before 13..... 7/8 years of time where they could be coached in how to head the ball properly lost and probably end up with worse injuries due to that.

[neil7908]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If they arent going to ban it its pretty silly to say no heading before 13..... 7/8 years of time where they could be coached in how to head the ball properly lost and probably end up with worse injuries due to that.

How much heading do 10 year olds need to do? Get the ball down and focus on passing, shooting and dribbling. Heading is certainly a skill but I don't see it being a priority for kids.

[Brightside]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

How much heading do 10 year olds need to do? Get the ball down and focus on passing, shooting and dribbling. Heading is certainly a skill but I don't see it being a priority for kids.

Its not a priority but us others have stated on the thread its amazing how few kids are actually coached in it at all.... same goes for throw ins etc. They are all fundamentals of football, and lack of heading skill is the reason why you see so many goals are let in from corners etc.

[DetroitHibs]

Heading is a HUGE part of the game, especially defending and being able to attack the ball. I remember as a kid not being taught and how brutal it was heading the ball with the top of your head and not the forehead. Some proper coaching goes a long way.

[Phil MaGlass]

It was bound to happen, we stopped kicking the ball years ago and moved onto kicking the man.
Seriously though, I think its a good move anything to properly protect kids is good.

[Brightside]

I assume tackling in rugby is also banned for under 12s? I have no idea tbh but it must be as even more chance of brain jolts via that.

[The Spaceman]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I assume tackling in rugby is also banned for under 12s? I have no idea tbh but it must be as even more chance of brain jolts via that.

Not if you tackle properly.

[Vault Boy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I assume tackling in rugby is also banned for under 12s? I have no idea tbh but it must be as even more chance of brain jolts via that.

There are quite a few changes to the rules for U13s rugby in order to make it safer. Tackles are allowed, but there are more restrictions to certain types of movement and challenges. They quite often don't scrum either.

I don't see any issue whatsoever with mitigating against risk to the long-term health of children, most of whom will never become professional footballers. The evidence linking headers to brain injury is pretty conclusive.

[Brightside]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

There are quite a few changes to the rules for U13s rugby in order to make it safer. Tackles are allowed, but there are more restrictions to certain types of movement and challenges. They quite often don't scrum either.

I don't see any issue whatsoever with mitigating against risk to the long-term health of children, most of whom will never become professional footballers. The evidence linking headers to brain injury is pretty conclusive.

Boxing? Re the evidence I’d like to see more detail on players from recent times.

[Vault Boy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Boxing? Re the evidence I’d like to see more detail on players from recent times.

Boxing is an incredibly dangerous sport when done competitively. I've got no interest in it and I'm not sure what the question is.

There have been peer reviewed studies that show that heading a modern football causes short term mental impairment, including inhibiting memory performance immediately after a heading drill. The long term effects of this are pretty widely considered to be damaging by neurologists/concussion experts. There's not much debate to be had on this front.

[Cataplana]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Boxing is an incredibly dangerous sport when done competitively. I've got no interest in it and I'm not sure what the question is.

There have been peer reviewed studies that show that heading a modern footbal causes short term mental impairment, including inhibiting memory performance immediately after a heading drill. The long term effects of this are pretty widely considered to be damaging by neurologists/concussion experts. There's not much debate to be had on this front.

Maybe a bit of caution is advisable. Players that have been heading the newer, lightweight balls that came in the 90s will not be at an age where dementia will be showing itself yet.

I recently saw an article that said aluminium was definitely a cause of dementia. When I looked into it more, another says there is no proof of that, at all

However, where a reasonable doubt exists (most of the people with dementia were not professional footballers) then a bit of care with young brains can't go amiss.

[Onceinawhile]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Its not a priority but us others have stated on the thread its amazing how few kids are actually coached in it at all.... same goes for throw ins etc. They are all fundamentals of football, and lack of heading skill is the reason why you see so many goals are let in from corners etc.

Don't get throw ins until they're about 11 or 12 either.

[jacomo]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The games gone down hill since they outlawed proper tackling and this VAR nonsense. Take away heading or kids being taught how to head the ball and the game will just continue to decline even further.

Science!

I don’t have time for those who point blank refuse to accept evidence being presented by experts in this field.

[hibsbollah]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Maybe a bit of caution is advisable. Players that have been heading the newer, lightweight balls that came in the 90s will not be at an age where dementia will be showing itself yet.

I recently saw an article that said aluminium was definitely a cause of dementia. When I looked into it more, another says there is no proof of that, at all

However, where a reasonable doubt exists (most of the people with dementia were not professional footballers) then a bit of care with young brains can't go amiss.

From what I've read, the perception that new lightweight balls are 'safer' in relation to head injury is totally wrong. The old 1970s wet leather ball from my distant memory was indeed heavier, but what causes injury is the weight of impact,which can be even more severe when a lighter ball hits you at twice the speed than if a heavier ball hits you at a slower speed.

There's no alternative, when it comes to child health you have to follow the science.

[lord bunberry]

Kids at that age never head the ball anyway, corners are almost always taken short. People saying the art of heading the ball will be lost obviously don’t watch much kids football. It’s not until under 13s that it even becomes competitive. Below that age it’s all about developing skills and keeping the ball on the deck.

[Peevemor]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

From what I've read, the perception that new lightweight balls are 'safer' in relation to head injury is totally wrong. The old 1970s wet leather ball from my distant memory was indeed heavier, but what causes injury is the weight of impact,which can be even more severe when a lighter ball hits you at twice the speed than if a heavier ball hits you at a slower speed.

It'll even itself out (mass x velocity).

However, with kids the problems won't come from corners or free kicks anyway - it's being under/on the receiving end of a keeper's clearance from hand where an old, wet leather ball will be far worse, given that it'll drop at the same speed as a lighter ball.

There's no alternative, when it comes to child health you have to follow the science.

[WeeRussell]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-51129653

This has already been implemented in the USA since 2015 and presumably has very significant implications for the future of the game if it ultimately gets adopted worldwide. Remove heading from the game and there's a massive change in the way football is played. What happens at corners and set pieces? Not to mention the way defenders and strikers are coached.

If long-term health issues are the key factor here, why limit the move only to under-12s?

I have no idea, but as we get older and grow, are our heids stronger and more resistant etc?

[Cataplana]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

From what I've read, the perception that new lightweight balls are 'safer' in relation to head injury is totally wrong. The old 1970s wet leather ball from my distant memory was indeed heavier, but what causes injury is the weight of impact,which can be even more severe when a lighter ball hits you at twice the speed than if a heavier ball hits you at a slower speed.

There's no alternative, when it comes to child health you have to follow the science.

My point is there is no science to suggest the newer balls cause dementia, as the cohort in question has not reached the age where signs of dementia emerge.

Likewise, the science surrounding footballers is slightly flawed in that, it would require a control, such as how many times people have headed the ball, which is pretty much impossible to measure .

For example, you would expect a higher incidence in centre halfs, compared to wingers. As far as I am aware the science does not examine that.

However, while there is a slight doubt, it makes sense for official coaches to discourage headering. What the kids do in their own time is another matter.

[lyonhibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Thats not entirely correct is it ?

On that theory you are potentially ignoring a huge part of the game.Do corner kicks & possibly free kicks become irrelevant.

At u12 level, pretty much. But this is not some legal ban on any kids ever heading a ball, anywhere, ever again. There will still be kids down the park with their friends and parents having a kickaround as ever they did.

Much ado about nothing. Lots of the best teams play free kicks and corners on the ground already (as much as short corners drive me mad!)

[Brightside]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Don't get throw ins until they're about 11 or 12 either.

Ive had 7/8 year olds doing throw ins for years. I couldnt care less what the SFA or ESSDA say. Kick ins from the side re the worst thing in kids football. 15 years olds getting pulled up for not being able to do a throw in is embarrassing.

[Onceinawhile]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Kids at that age never head the ball anyway, corners are almost always taken short. People saying the art of heading the ball will be lost obviously don’t watch much kids football. It’s not until under 13s that it even becomes competitive. Below that age it’s all about developing skills and keeping the ball on the deck.

Maybe in theory, but the season of 7s I've just been through saw plenty headers and lots of corners getting put into the box.

and it might be "non-competitive", but it's usually anything but.

[hibsbollah]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

My point is there is no science to suggest the newer balls cause dementia, as the cohort in question has not reached the age where signs of dementia emerge.

Likewise, the science surrounding footballers is slightly flawed in that, it would require a control, such as how many times people have headed the ball, which is pretty much impossible to measure .

For example, you would expect a higher incidence in centre halfs, compared to wingers. As far as I am aware the science does not examine that.

However, while there is a slight doubt, it makes sense for official coaches to discourage headering. What the kids do in their own time is another matter.

The scientists don't need to wait for the end of a cohort of players heading newer lighter balls, for them to know that repetitive heading of those balls will cause the same incidents of brain trauma that have been seen previously. It is inevitable when you apply the basic physics that you learn at school, with the emerging knowledge of what causes brain trauma. The heaviness of the ball isnt the decisive factor.

[Cataplana]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The scientists don't need to wait for the end of a cohort of players heading newer lighter balls, for them to know that repetitive heading of those balls will cause the same incidents of brain trauma that have been seen previously. It is inevitable when you apply the basic physics that you learn at school, with the emerging knowledge of what causes brain trauma. The heaviness of the ball isnt the decisive factor.

I'd argue that the weight of the object would be a factor using a simple mass X velocity equation, to calculate the amount of energy being absorbed by the brain.

However, I am not a scientist, and it's not really relevant to this discussion .

Given the number of variables that come to play on brain function, it's not possible to say with any certainty what causes dementia. So, the science is far from exact, and brain function is much more complex than simple physics.

I don't want to go further off track, but the science is little more than a stab in the dark, when it comes to working out how to prevent these terrible conditions. The majority of dementia sufferers are women, and it's a fair bet the never headed a ball in their life.

However with young bodies, you can never be too safe. So, I'm cool with the ban.