They are though? Each new member donates his £225 straight to the football club, and becomes a member of HSL with a “say” on the 15% shareholding just the same as the 1500 existing members?This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I agree with what I think you are saying - create a separate scheme for donating money to the club.
Results 91 to 98 of 98
Thread: HSL Donations Poll
-
13-10-2019 01:10 PM #91
-
13-10-2019 01:47 PM #92
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- hong kong
- Posts
- 562
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Thats another reason why it needs seperating.
It would be good if someone from hsl to clarify this on here.
-
14-10-2019 05:56 AM #93
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,048
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
“Thank you HSL for giving me the opportunity to have my name on a shirt to be worn by the team I love. It was an outstanding initiative but once I have done that I intend to stop my contribution and simply be a supporter in the conventional way”
But instead it came out as a dig at HSL and, by inference, at the club.
Everyone is absolutely entitled to support or be a fan of the club exactly as they please or as their financial position will allow but is it really necessary to use that as an excuses to introduce such negativity?
-
14-10-2019 06:09 AM #94This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-10-2019 07:24 AM #95
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,048
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That’s what I was thinking
-
14-10-2019 08:09 AM #96This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-10-2019 11:42 AM #97
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 8,155
I'm not about to stop my HSL donations - however I do agree that, given the new ownership arrangements whereby HSL contributions will no longer contribute to fan ownership, the goalposts have now been moved and therefore the model on which HSL works needs to change also.
Personally I would favour some kind of membership scheme whereby the overriding purpose remains to be additional fundraising directly for the benefit of the football team - some sort of benefits could be granted which we could all then have massive arguments on here about - falling out with each other and casting aspersions on Petrie's dubious motives before realising that he's now buggered off to the SFA and has nothing to do with it.
-
14-10-2019 12:00 PM #98This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
At meetings it was made clear that HSL were looking to get a dialogue going with the Nominees and that any money pot for shares was to support any talks etc.
There will also be a point at which the pot of money covers what we're willing to pay for those shares, at that time I'm sure HSL would be advocating that 100% of monies collected goes to the playing side. In short, the shares/team split is only temporary anyway.
That's my take on it from reading what HSL have said on here/elsewhere and at the meetings.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks