First game I’ve missed all season only heard snippets on the radio, but wouldn’t it have been better, after they had a man sent of, to have brought on Kamberi to play along side Doidge, using two attackers instead of replacing him with Doidge.
It was a totally defensive tactic when it shouldn’t have been, two up front in that situation wins you the game, one striker let’s them attack more, which is what they did and they scored. Two strikers keeps them at bay.
Okay, get tore into me, but I think the guy doesn’t know how to win.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
06-10-2019 09:29 AM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 542
I wasn’t there but here’s what I think
-
06-10-2019 09:32 AM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-10-2019 09:36 AM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-10-2019 09:43 AM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'd probably agree that I would have rather he brought on Kamberi and played the 2 upfront. But if the outcome had been the same there would have been the "why did he go 2 upfront when we're trying to see out the game? Shocking game management" threads.Mon the Hibs.
-
06-10-2019 09:45 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-10-2019 09:48 AM #6
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- Greenland
- Posts
- 1,389
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks