The new director of football or the new manager?
I know that’s not strictly what George Craig’s job title is but is our failure to act on Heckingbottom clearly failing linked to not having Craig’s replacement in?
If Craig’s replacement is going to be the managers boss does it make sense to bide our time until the new DoF is in place?
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: What comes first?
-
19-10-2019 07:22 PM #1
What comes first?
-
19-10-2019 07:25 PM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
19-10-2019 07:27 PM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-10-2019 07:26 AM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk
-
20-10-2019 08:05 AM #5
- Join Date
- Apr 2017
- Posts
- 250
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
As fans we don’t know what the new owners plans are, we don’t know anything about the George Craig situation, we don’t know what their thoughts are about Hecky’s performance (or lack of it ), we don’t know how they feel about the current predicament of the club.
It is disrespectful of the club to treat the life blood of the club this way.
-
20-10-2019 09:34 AM #6
Manager is an immediate requirement as we are in danger of going down if we stick with current useless incumbent.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks