hibs.net Messageboard

 

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 48 of 48

Thread: Jon Flanagan

  1. #31
    First Team Regular Stokesy's on fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    953
    Quote Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Alleged Party in Breach: Kevin Harper, Player, Albion Rovers FC



    shirly the wee man still aint playing at 43
    i had a look at the Albion team lines and he didnt seem to be on the bench at or named as a player


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #32
    Prediction League Supremo - 05/06 MB62's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Warriston
    Age
    60
    Posts
    7,482
    Quote Originally Posted by DarlingtonHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Is this for the Scott brown incident?

    Thought if you were booked, they could not do anything.

    Was a red all day long.
    And more than likely changed the course of the game.
    Celtc were losing 1-0, should have had a penalty (the ball WAS in play from the corner, only just, but was in play) and derhun down to 10 men

  4. #33
    Testimonial Due HibbyCal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    28
    Posts
    4,041
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: calhill19
    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat Hound View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not the 1st time he's been before a judicial panel. ****bag.
    Least it was against a man this time. ****bag.

  5. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Sylar View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's another incident of someone trying to change a referee's decision, because once again, the referee got it wrong...**** all to do with the club. Perhaps if there weren't so many ill-disciplined mules in The Rangers' team, they wouldn't be repeatedly being cited.

    But like an earlier poster, I have a degree of sympathy with them - this "trial by television" is only consistent if every single team is reviewed in the same way, via a full assessment of both sides and all contentious incidents. There needs to be a consistent application of retrospective action across all clubs - something hopefully VAR might help with, if it's ever introduced.
    The Simunovic incident was referred to the panel by the compliance officer but the three did not agree that it was a red card offence.

  6. #35
    @hibs.net private member Deansy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,231
    Quote Originally Posted by Criswell View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why is the Compliance Officer not looking at Bruce's blatant dive to win a penalty against us? Or Defoe's ludicrous attempt to con the Referee into giving one against Celtic? Shameful cheating behaviour going unpunished!


    And why isn't the ref who only booked Flanagan (an incredulous decision - it was a red-card/penalty !) being pulled-up for his sub-standard officiating ? These disciplinaries cost money therefore his 'performance' is costing the Scottish game !#

    'ďIt seems as if Rangersí players are being held to a different code of conduct from players at other clubs"

    Of course they are, they have to be - the rest of clubs haven't been caught cheating (yes I know but legally - unfortunately - Hearts got away with it !) so the authorities have to be extra-careful on clubs 'with form' as they have yet to be proven hoinest & trustworthy ...................

  7. #36
    ****s are getting embarrassing with these statements ... was just funny to begin with now a complete red neck


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #37
    @hibs.net private member Stevie Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prestonfield
    Age
    41
    Posts
    6,941

  9. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by JP1302 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    ****s are getting embarrassing with these statements ... was just funny to begin with now a complete red neck


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Right though.
    They are treated differently from those at other clubs.
    What other team would have got off with that.

  10. #39
    @hibs.net private member lord bunberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    13,189
    The whole system is a joke. Apparently the rule is that you canít be given a red card retrospectively if the ref has seen it and issued a yellow. If hibs had appealed our players red we wouldíve won it.

    United we stand here....

  11. #40
    ******ing farce, ******ing joke

  12. #41
    Testimonial Due Since90+2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Leith
    Posts
    3,597
    Genuinely amazed that it's been over turned.

    One of the most blatant red cards you will ever see.

  13. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by lord bunberry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The whole system is a joke. Apparently the rule is that you canít be given a red card retrospectively if the ref has seen it and issued a yellow. If hibs had appealed our players red we wouldíve won it.
    Youíre miles off beam.He was referred by the compliance officer to a panel of three referees who thought it should be upgraded to a red.Rangers appealed and the appeals panel didnít think it should be upgraded.Donít know what the appeals panel consists of but itís not three refs.Obviously a yellow can be made a red retrospectively.

  14. #43
    @hibs.net private member lord bunberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    13,189
    Quote Originally Posted by ancient hibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Youíre miles off beam.He was referred by the compliance officer to a panel of three referees who thought it should be upgraded to a red.Rangers appealed and the appeals panel didnít think it should be upgraded.Donít know what the appeals panel consists of but itís not three refs.Obviously a yellow can be made a red retrospectively.
    Thatís what I thought after our game against Celtic, but I was reading on twitter that wasnít the case. Whatever way the decision was reached the whole system is a farce, itís as clear a red card as you can hope for.

    United we stand here....

  15. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by lord bunberry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Thatís what I thought after our game against Celtic, but I was reading on twitter that wasnít the case. Whatever way the decision was reached the whole system is a farce, itís as clear a red card as you can hope for.
    Agree 100%.

  16. #45
    The change the rules depending on which teams involved in the matter, it starts that Celtic get everything, then Sevco, then Aberdeen, then Hertz, then Killie, the after that it's a lottery with decisions being upheld, upgraded or overturned ....sick of the unfairness and corruption that goes along with almost every debatable decision made with certain teams claiming and challenging anything that goes against them and the law of averages shows that they have a pretty decent success rate of getting the outcome they were looking for and if not that they get a few important decisions in the next few games ..!!!

  17. #46
    @hibs.net private member oldbutdim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,149
    Flanagan should put in a late appeal against his conviction for beating up his girlfriend.

    He was just as innocent on that occasion.

  18. #47
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    The wrong side of the track
    Posts
    1,067
    Quote Originally Posted by eastcoasthibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The change the rules depending on which teams involved in the matter, it starts that Celtic get everything, then Sevco, then Aberdeen, then Hertz, then Killie, the after that it's a lottery with decisions being upheld, upgraded or overturned ....sick of the unfairness and corruption that goes along with almost every debatable decision made with certain teams claiming and challenging anything that goes against them and the law of averages shows that they have a pretty decent success rate of getting the outcome they were looking for and if not that they get a few important decisions in the next few games ..!!!
    So whats new nothing changed while the GFA are still in charge.

  19. #48
    @hibs.net private member Diclonius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Larbert
    Age
    27
    Posts
    12,596
    Quote Originally Posted by lord bunberry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Thatís what I thought after our game against Celtic, but I was reading on twitter that wasnít the case. Whatever way the decision was reached the whole system is a farce, itís as clear a red card as you can hope for.
    And yet when Cummings was booked for overcelebrating after scoring against Hearts at Tynecastle, the compliance officer upgraded that to a red too.

    To be fair it was also overturned.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2012 All Rights Reserved