Jon Flanagan

[Stokesy's on fire]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Alleged Party in Breach: Kevin Harper, Player, Albion Rovers FC



shirly the wee man still aint playing at 43

i had a look at the Albion team lines and he didnt seem to be on the bench at or named as a player

[MB62]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Is this for the Scott brown incident?

Thought if you were booked, they could not do anything.

Was a red all day long.

And more than likely changed the course of the game.
Celtc were losing 1-0, should have had a penalty (the ball WAS in play from the corner, only just, but was in play) and derhun down to 10 men

[MrRobot]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Not the 1st time he's been before a judicial panel. ****bag.

Least it was against a man this time. ****bag.

[ancient hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's another incident of someone trying to change a referee's decision, because once again, the referee got it wrong...**** all to do with the club. Perhaps if there weren't so many ill-disciplined mules in The Rangers' team, they wouldn't be repeatedly being cited.

But like an earlier poster, I have a degree of sympathy with them - this "trial by television" is only consistent if every single team is reviewed in the same way, via a full assessment of both sides and all contentious incidents. There needs to be a consistent application of retrospective action across all clubs - something hopefully VAR might help with, if it's ever introduced.

The Simunovic incident was referred to the panel by the compliance officer but the three did not agree that it was a red card offence.

[Deansy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Why is the Compliance Officer not looking at Bruce's blatant dive to win a penalty against us? Or Defoe's ludicrous attempt to con the Referee into giving one against Celtic? Shameful cheating behaviour going unpunished!

And why isn't the ref who only booked Flanagan (an incredulous decision - it was a red-card/penalty !) being pulled-up for his sub-standard officiating ? These disciplinaries cost money therefore his 'performance' is costing the Scottish game !#

'“It seems as if Rangers’ players are being held to a different code of conduct from players at other clubs"

Of course they are, they have to be - the rest of clubs haven't been caught cheating (yes I know but legally - unfortunately - Hearts got away with it !) so the authorities have to be extra-careful on clubs 'with form' as they have yet to be proven hoinest & trustworthy ...................

[JP1302]

****s are getting embarrassing with these statements ... was just funny to begin with now a complete red neck


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Stevie Reid]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48273295

[lord bunberry]

The whole system is a joke. Apparently the rule is that you can’t be given a red card retrospectively if the ref has seen it and issued a yellow. If hibs had appealed our players red we would’ve won it.

[Joe6-2]

******ing farce, ******ing joke

[Since90+2]

Genuinely amazed that it's been over turned.

One of the most blatant red cards you will ever see.

[ancient hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The whole system is a joke. Apparently the rule is that you can’t be given a red card retrospectively if the ref has seen it and issued a yellow. If hibs had appealed our players red we would’ve won it.

You’re miles off beam.He was referred by the compliance officer to a panel of three referees who thought it should be upgraded to a red.Rangers appealed and the appeals panel didn’t think it should be upgraded.Don’t know what the appeals panel consists of but it’s not three refs.Obviously a yellow can be made a red retrospectively.

[lord bunberry]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You’re miles off beam.He was referred by the compliance officer to a panel of three referees who thought it should be upgraded to a red.Rangers appealed and the appeals panel didn’t think it should be upgraded.Don’t know what the appeals panel consists of but it’s not three refs.Obviously a yellow can be made a red retrospectively.

That’s what I thought after our game against Celtic, but I was reading on twitter that wasn’t the case. Whatever way the decision was reached the whole system is a farce, it’s as clear a red card as you can hope for.

[ancient hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

That’s what I thought after our game against Celtic, but I was reading on twitter that wasn’t the case. Whatever way the decision was reached the whole system is a farce, it’s as clear a red card as you can hope for.

Agree 100%.

[eastcoasthibby]

The change the rules depending on which teams involved in the matter, it starts that Celtic get everything, then Sevco, then Aberdeen, then Hertz, then Killie, the after that it's a lottery with decisions being upheld, upgraded or overturned ....sick of the unfairness and corruption that goes along with almost every debatable decision made with certain teams claiming and challenging anything that goes against them and the law of averages shows that they have a pretty decent success rate of getting the outcome they were looking for and if not that they get a few important decisions in the next few games ..!!!

[oldbutdim]

Flanagan should put in a late appeal against his conviction for beating up his girlfriend.

He was just as innocent on that occasion.

[A Hi-Bee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The change the rules depending on which teams involved in the matter, it starts that Celtic get everything, then Sevco, then Aberdeen, then Hertz, then Killie, the after that it's a lottery with decisions being upheld, upgraded or overturned ....sick of the unfairness and corruption that goes along with almost every debatable decision made with certain teams claiming and challenging anything that goes against them and the law of averages shows that they have a pretty decent success rate of getting the outcome they were looking for and if not that they get a few important decisions in the next few games ..!!!

So whats new nothing changed while the GFA are still in charge.

[Diclonius]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

That’s what I thought after our game against Celtic, but I was reading on twitter that wasn’t the case. Whatever way the decision was reached the whole system is a farce, it’s as clear a red card as you can hope for.

And yet when Cummings was booked for overcelebrating after scoring against Hearts at Tynecastle, the compliance officer upgraded that to a red too.

To be fair it was also overturned.