Had the lad pissed in lennon’s cornflakes?
We’ve moved milligan to play at centre half when we looked a lot more effective with him in the midfield. Why not keep porteous in there?
Again today he brought on mcgregor who had a shocker when we could’ve done with younger fitter legs coming on at that point in the game.
Pretty baffling to award him a 5 year deal then take him out the team
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Porteous
-
03-11-2018 05:15 PM #1
Porteous
-
03-11-2018 05:16 PM #2
Agreed. He only got a 1 year extension though.
There was no reason to play Milligan in defence today. None at all.
-
03-11-2018 05:23 PM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I guess the point is that RP is on a long contract, presumably on improved terms.
I did think maybe Spike could have been rested today.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks