I see Jamie Murphy is out for the season with ligament damage, which has prompted another outpouring of anti artificial pitch speeches from Gerrard etc. Is there actually any truth in the idea these pitches are more likely to cause injury or is this just an urban myth? Presumably ligament damage can happen on any kind of pitch?
Results 1 to 29 of 29
Thread: artificial pitches
-
22-08-2018 04:47 PM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- A thousand miles from nowhere
- Posts
- 756
artificial pitches
-
22-08-2018 05:27 PM #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,890
Elite players will obviously have a far more informed view but I've played competitive football at varying levels for 20+ years and playing on the new generations of pitches was eye opening in how much easier it is to play on, ie flat, smooth surface, great for passing football, not having to second guess the pitch etc. They are also almost always playable but I understand the emotional attachment to grass and the aversion to the aesthetics re the pellets etc.
Having said all that, despite still playing the majority of my football on it I can count on one hand the number of injuries (more than small knocks) I have picked up on grass. On the other hand I've come away from playing on 3/4G pitches a number of times with back and heel impact injuries, while playing on it comparitively much less.
There's a number of variables at play of course, individual physiologies, age, the generation/quality of the pitch etc etc, but IMO (and their will be many views) it seems pretty obvious there are risks inherent with artificial pitches. I was quite amazed by the guy on Sportsound the other day saying there are no significant differences in the rates of injury. Again I'm no expert but my experience, and that of many of the guys I play with, is very different.
Having said all that, the benefits of these pitches are clear and if they can help improve the future of our game, maybe later generations will solve the perceived issues.
-
22-08-2018 05:42 PM #3
There are places for artificial pitches, but the top flight league in Scotland shouldn't be one of them. At least, not the ones of the quality we have been subjected to to date.
-
22-08-2018 05:43 PM #4
There does not appear to be any data to say that there are more injuries on Astro compared to grass.
I prefer grass myself but any debate can’t be based on Murphy getting injured on it as if that injury never happens on grass.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
22-08-2018 05:44 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
23-08-2018 09:11 AM #6
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- A thousand miles from nowhere
- Posts
- 756
Article in today’s herald with a boffin saying that there is no evidence to suggest these pitches are more injury-causing
-
23-08-2018 09:22 AM #7
I suppose a lot of those stats would come down to how many injuries are actually reported by players for these 'boffins' to gather their data.
I would take the word over the professionals that play on them multiple times at a competitive level and are speaking out against them, over the word of a boffin sat at a desk looking at figures.
As a previous poster has said, I can see the use of artificial pitches but IMO they should not be used for a professional clubs competitive games in the top league of Scottish football.
-
23-08-2018 01:20 PM #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 1,156
[QUOTE=patlowe;5525821]Elite players will obviously have a far more informed view but I've played competitive football at varying levels for 20+ years and playing on the new generations of pitches was eye opening in how much easier it is to play on, ie flat, smooth surface, great for passing football, not having to second guess the pitch etc. They are also almost always playable but I understand the emotional attachment to grass and the aversion to the aesthetics re the pellets etc.
Having said all that, despite still playing the majority of my football on it I can count on one hand the number of injuries (more than small knocks) I have picked up on grass. On the other hand I've come away from playing on 3/4G pitches a number of times with back and heel impact injuries, while playing on it comparitively much less.
There's a number of variables at play of course, individual physiologies, age, the generation/quality of the pitch etc etc, but IMO (and their will be many views) it seems pretty obvious there are risks inherent with artificial pitches. I was quite amazed by the guy on Sportsound the other day saying there are no significant differences in the rates of injury. Again I'm no expert but my experience, and that of many of the guys I play with, is very different.
Having said all that, the benefits of these pitches are clear and if they can help improve the future of our game, maybe later generations will solve the perceived issues.[/QUOTE
All about opinions but couldn't disagree with you more. It's a completely different game on artificial surfaces as you can't get the same quick movements as you do on grass. Hated playing on them and hate watching games on them too (it's like watching a practice match). If football was played solely on astro pitches my days as a football supporter would end. I understand the need for them in Scotland's weather but at the top level they should be banned.
e
-
23-08-2018 01:25 PM #9
I don't think they should be allowed in the top flight, theres always a risk of injury when playing on any type of pitch. We tend not to risk Boyle on them and didn't risk Fyvie on plastic surfaces. There does seem to be more serious injuries sustained on them though.
-
23-08-2018 02:53 PM #10
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Location
- Livingston
- Posts
- 2,200
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Looking at the last week, Berra's injury was on grass, Jamie Murphy's happened on plastic so we must get rid of plastic???
Maybe we should all just have asphalt or shale, and maybe have no studs on to lessen the chance of injuries!!!!
-
23-08-2018 03:09 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
23-08-2018 03:39 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I thought hearts have a hybrid pitch of some sort?
-
23-08-2018 03:57 PM #13
It’ll be the end of the art of streaking ...
https://www.snsgroup.co.uk/dunfermline-v-hibs-765975.html
Anyone able to put their hand up to that one?
-
23-08-2018 04:06 PM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 2,881
I've played almost exclusively on astro for the last 10 years and not really played on grass at all. Last year I done the play on the pitch at Easter road and despite playing football 3 times a week I was sore for almost a week after that game. It wasn't as much muscle soreness from exercise it was more joint pain and quite a sore back.
My take on it was I was used to playing on astro and not grass and my body wasn't used to it. Flip that on its head and players usually play on grass and may pick up small injuries from astro if they are unfamiliar with the surface
-
23-08-2018 04:22 PM #15
Anybody that states the pitches cause more damage simply are talking out there *****, i know this as i have extreme knowledge on these pitches for over 20 years.
but to give you all a fantastic example and story - Frank Sauzee played at the world of football many years ago, (in fact hearts and hibs both used the WOF in chesser around the same time and even had pitches next to each other)
He and mcleish loved the pitches as frank did less damage to his knees as opposed to training on the grass pitches. Now that was on the old pitches, the newer pitches are even better.
Can't get a better reference than that :)
-
23-08-2018 04:40 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-08-2018 06:01 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544152/"We know the people who have invested so far are simple fans." Vladimir Romanov - Scotsman 10th December 2012
"Romanov was like a breath of fresh air - laced with cyanide." Me.
-
23-08-2018 06:49 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 77
- Posts
- 2,343
Originally Posted by where'stheslope;5526729[BThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Of course they do - because many many more matches are played on grass! A % figure would have to be used to to make a fair comparison.
-
23-08-2018 07:06 PM #19
Personally I find artificial pitches to leave me with aching ankles, knees and lower back and much prefer to play/practice on grass.
-
23-08-2018 08:04 PM #20
Maintenance (topping up sand / pellets) and wearing the correct footwear are key apparently.
i found my Achilles feeling the strain."We know the people who have invested so far are simple fans." Vladimir Romanov - Scotsman 10th December 2012
"Romanov was like a breath of fresh air - laced with cyanide." Me.
-
23-08-2018 08:05 PM #21
Thing for me is, there might be alot less injuries on artificial pitches if clubs like Killie actually ke[t their pitch in pristene condition, maybe the so called experts can tell us how many injuries happened on ****ty kept artificial pitches, how teams like killie get away with it ah dinne ken?
-
23-08-2018 08:07 PM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-08-2018 10:41 PM #23
Just out of interest and purely in the context of debate, are there any injury stats coming out of the MLS where I would presume there are far more team percentage wise have artificial pitches?
-
24-08-2018 07:09 AM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-08-2018 07:20 AM #25
Don’t understand the “don’t belong in top flight” argument. Should a team, let’s say Falkirk, have grass one season then lay down a synthetic pitch the next and go on to win the league - should they then fork out another half million or so putting grass back down? I’d say have them i the third division only. A grace period (ie a team gets promoted and they have 3 or 4 seasons to lay grass) in the second and first but the the time a team is in the top flight it should be grass.
-
24-08-2018 09:10 AM #26This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It will be interesting to keep an eye on the hybrid pitch at Tynecastle throughout the season as this does seem to be the most preferable way of doing things, albeit an expensive one and out of reach financially for most clubs.
-
24-08-2018 12:13 PM #27
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 7,801
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Overall plastic pitches cause far more injuries than grass.
Afraid it's you that's simply talking out your, ahem, bottom.
-
24-08-2018 12:30 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Some players have blamed hybrid pitches for injuries though.
-
24-08-2018 12:34 PM #29
I don't think i have seen one decent game of football on a plastic pitch, for that reason alone i wouldn't have them in the top tier.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks