http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/f...-look-12205312
Seems he was looking to stoke the flames but couldn't get enough backers.
Lawell made intimations a few weeks ago that certain people were holding the game back. One name that he didn't mention doing things for the good of the game was petries.
Results 1 to 30 of 56
Thread: Petries days numbered?
-
18-03-2018 10:31 AM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2016
- Posts
- 2,158
Petries days numbered?
-
18-03-2018 11:24 AM #2
The silence from this man is as always deafening, don't hold your breath for a comment from him on this or more importantly backing his manager against idiot referees.
-
18-03-2018 11:39 AM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
18-03-2018 11:46 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 4,115
So he's opposed to the disaster that is Donkeycaster...does that make him a bad person?
-
18-03-2018 11:50 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 11:54 AM #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2016
- Posts
- 2,158
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 11:54 AM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Doncaster comes in and suddenly his position looks less favorably, he only cares about himself and keeping his comfy spot at the top of an outdated board.
-
18-03-2018 12:03 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 12:07 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 12:08 PM #10
Odd role Petrie has in relation to his SFA and Hibs roles now.
Not sure how he could be at backwards a dinosaur as made out to be considering he oversees what we all see as a fairly progressive set up at Hibs?
Then again, how's he meant to be impartial if some at the SFA did want Dempster as CEO?
-
18-03-2018 12:29 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
All we can look at is the fact that he has been part of a massively failing SFA for a long time now. He also failed spectacularly when he was ceo of Hibs and our turn around only came when Leeann arrived. And Leeann still has a lot of work to do there as we are miles behind Aberdeen when it comes to bringing in commercial income to the club.
Petrie wants to lead Scottish football just because he thinks it’s his turn. Is that really how we think it should work just because he happens to be linked with our club?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
18-03-2018 12:33 PM #12
Peter Lawwell is only interested in himself and what his billionaire pay master Dermot Desmond tells him to do. Regardless of what he’s done before, I’d back Petrie against Doncaster having any influence on the future of Scottish football.
"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.' - Paulo Freire
-
18-03-2018 12:37 PM #13
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- kirkcaldy
- Posts
- 11,538
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 12:40 PM #14
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,046
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 12:45 PM #15This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
-
18-03-2018 12:51 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
What’s the positive case for putting Petrie in charge of Scottish football?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
18-03-2018 01:02 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 01:06 PM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
18-03-2018 01:15 PM #19
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,046
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 01:25 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
18-03-2018 01:34 PM #21
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,046
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 01:40 PM #22
- Join Date
- Feb 2018
- Posts
- 860
It’s all set up for Lawwell to take over sooner rather than laterZ. It’s why he left the SFA board in the first place before even ripping Petrie and the chairman.
-
18-03-2018 01:40 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 01:54 PM #24
The really sad thing about this "debate" is that folk cant see past there own prejudices and that instantly decides their standpoint without any objective analysis of the situation, if its suits their views about certain individuals.
And we wonder why Scottish Football governance is in the state it is?
Scottish Football must be one of the most parochial and petty biased sporting systems in the world.
We are all guilty, I instantly think that because one of the OF is mumping about it, that it must be a good think for everyone else.
I used to think that women were more guilty of harbouring deep seated grudges that they should have let go years ago, but the anti Petrie venom is something special.
I hold no great love for the man and there is no doubt whatsoever that there have been a lot of mistakes made, but I don't for a second harbour anY thought that they were made with ill intent.
Point me to a football club in the world where similar mistakes have not been made.
Therefore my view is that he maybe wasn't up to the job he was given, if that's the case and he fulfilled it to the best of his abilities, which I believe he did, then the problem's not his but the folk that recruited him.
What I find really distasteful about any Petrie thread and this thread encapsulates it perfectly is that any attempt to debate the opposite viewpoint is instantly dismissed and the posters involved belittled / ridiculed.
If your standpoint is that Petrie is a **** and the troubles that have befallen Hibs over his tenure are all down to him and him alone, that's fair enough its your view, not one that I agree with entirely but your view to which you are entitled.
If you cant debate the issue properly then maybe best to leave it at that?
I have seen folk on this thread and many anti Petrie threads basically coming out and saying the guy is a ****, that's it.
When other's disagree they are asked to provide umpteen reasons why he isn't against the one assertion that he is.
Poor stuff IMOLast edited by BSEJVT; 18-03-2018 at 01:56 PM.
-
18-03-2018 01:57 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'm surprised you're so dismissive of the suggestion.
-
18-03-2018 01:58 PM #26
I'm no lover of Rod Petrie but it seems the appointment of Doncaster is as much about self preservation as RPs opposition to it is; yet only one side is being given the treatment by the Record.
Doncaster was a total flop in his previous role yet has walked straight into another cosy job. I'd be more concerned if there weren't dissenting voices.
-
18-03-2018 02:02 PM #27
- Join Date
- Apr 2016
- Posts
- 2,158
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-03-2018 02:09 PM #28
The problem is that when you look at who is involved in all this; Petrie, Lawell, Doncaster and the Daily Record is easy to vote for none of the above. The SFA is and has been a place of self interest for as long as I have known anything about it and the characters who wander its corridors also seem split into so many factions its hardly surprising that football in this country has stagnated.
-
18-03-2018 02:10 PM #29This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If he comes out with a plan for such a thing then I’ll get behind him.
I want to be convinced. If Rod is worthy of the job then I’m all ears. I want to hear what his plan is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
18-03-2018 02:13 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks