hibs.net Messageboard

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Professional thread starter Diclonius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West Fife
    Age
    32
    Posts
    23,276

    Change to playoffs

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36389950

    Houston wants all three games to be one-offs.

    This isn't a bad idea in principle, but what about making the playoffs fair for all involved - i.e. by using the same format as the leagues below? As follows:

    Semi finals:
    11th in Premiership v 4th in Championship, two legged with second leg at Premiership team
    2nd v 3rd (Championship), same with second leg at 2nd placed team

    Final: the two winners meet each other at a neutral venue. I.e. if it was Falkirk v Kilmarnock they'd play it somewhere like Fir Park.

    As far as I know all votes of this kind are now voted on by the whole of the SPFL no getting this through should be no bother.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    It's probably more sensible. Or, at least have the final as a one off. Too many games at present.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by RagingReality View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36389950

    Houston wants all three games to be one-offs.

    This isn't a bad idea in principle, but what about making the playoffs fair for all involved - i.e. by using the same format as the leagues below? As follows:

    Semi finals:
    11th in Premiership v 4th in Championship, two legged with second leg at Premiership team
    2nd v 3rd (Championship), same with second leg at 2nd placed team

    Final: the two winners meet each other at a neutral venue. I.e. if it was Falkirk v Kilmarnock they'd play it somewhere like Fir Park.

    As far as I know all votes of this kind are now voted on by the whole of the SPFL no getting this through should be no bother.
    The other leagues have a two legged final at the moment, on a home/away basis.

  5. #4
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    13,151
    Quote Originally Posted by RagingReality View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36389950

    Houston wants all three games to be one-offs.

    This isn't a bad idea in principle, but what about making the playoffs fair for all involved - i.e. by using the same format as the leagues below? As follows:

    Semi finals:
    11th in Premiership v 4th in Championship, two legged with second leg at Premiership team
    2nd v 3rd (Championship), same with second leg at 2nd placed team

    Final: the two winners meet each other at a neutral venue. I.e. if it was Falkirk v Kilmarnock they'd play it somewhere like Fir Park.

    As far as I know all votes of this kind are now voted on by the whole of the SPFL no getting this through should be no bother.
    Very sensible proposal, so it's a non-starter in Scottish football.
    Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.

  6. #5
    @hibs.net private member greenlex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    27,688
    Just give us two leagues of 20 playing each other twice. Three up and three down automatically and have 4th bottom playing 4th top over two legs.

  7. #6
    Coaching Staff Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    35,518
    I'm hoping I won't give a flying ****.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #7
    Coaching Staff Broken Gnome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    40
    Posts
    5,579
    Get rid of 4th place involvement - they'ok never go on to win them and merely act as a burden to the teams that eventually play the semi-final before taking the inevitable tanking off 11th.

    2nd v 3rd home and away, winner plays two legs against the top flight team.

  9. #8
    First Team Breakthrough MileHighBees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    420
    Personal opinion in order of preference :-
    (unrelated to any Hibs future involvement or not )

    [1st choice] Scrap play-offs completely. 2 up & 2 down. Fair and simple.

    [2nd choice] 11th v 2nd as a one-off game at a neutral venue, preferably Hampden

    [3rd choice] 2nd v 3rd one-off game with 2nd getting home advantage, winner plays 11th at neutral venue.

    Agree with the comment that 4th should definitely not get a play-off chance

  10. #9
    Testimonial Due Finn2015's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    1,819
    Quote Originally Posted by greenlex View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Just give us two leagues of 20 playing each other twice. Three up and three down automatically and have 4th bottom playing 4th top over two legs.
    This with bells on. I'm all for a top division of 20 teams

  11. #10
    Coaching Staff Gatecrasher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Livingston
    Age
    38
    Posts
    16,699
    Blog Entries
    1
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: Euphoria1875
    I dont see why 4th in the championship should get a shot at being in the premiership, it's a mid table finish!

    i would have 2nd v 3rd in a 2 leg tie then the winner meets the premiership team at a neutral venue as a one off game.

  12. #11
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    46
    Posts
    26,869
    I like what the op says best - 11th v 4th and 2nd v 3rd.

  13. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by RagingReality View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36389950

    Houston wants all three games to be one-offs.

    This isn't a bad idea in principle, but what about making the playoffs fair for all involved - i.e. by using the same format as the leagues below? As follows:

    Semi finals:
    11th in Premiership v 4th in Championship, two legged with second leg at Premiership team
    2nd v 3rd (Championship), same with second leg at 2nd placed team

    Final: the two winners meet each other at a neutral venue. I.e. if it was Falkirk v Kilmarnock they'd play it somewhere like Fir Park.

    As far as I know all votes of this kind are now voted on by the whole of the SPFL no getting this through should be no bother.
    Scrap them all together, absolute nonsense!! A team can finish miles off the pace and still get promoted, joke!
    Last edited by Joe6-2; 27-05-2016 at 06:46 AM.

  14. #13
    Testimonial Due Septimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Paphos, Cyprus
    Posts
    1,510
    And no plastic pitches allowed.

  15. #14
    @hibs.net private member BSEJVT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Age
    61
    Posts
    5,859
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe6-2 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Scrap them all together, absolute nonsense!! A team can finish miles of the pace and still get promoted, joke!
    A straight 2nd v 11th for me

    I cant quite get why the team that finishes 3rd (sometimes a distant 3rd ) gets another crack at the whip.

  16. #15
    Promising Youngster Skåne Hibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Helsingborg, Sweden
    Posts
    89
    If we've got to keep them in their current form, then they need to lose the bookings carrying over to the Final game against the premier league team.

    If the playoffs are to be changed then it should be 2nd v 3rd only, lose the 4th place team. The 2nd and 3rd bottom premium league teams should both be involved then every team who gets to the playoff final has played the same number of games.

  17. #16
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,082
    Quote Originally Posted by RagingReality View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36389950

    Houston wants all three games to be one-offs.

    This isn't a bad idea in principle, but what about making the playoffs fair for all involved - i.e. by using the same format as the leagues below? As follows:

    Semi finals:
    11th in Premiership v 4th in Championship, two legged with second leg at Premiership team
    2nd v 3rd (Championship), same with second leg at 2nd placed team

    Final: the two winners meet each other at a neutral venue. I.e. if it was Falkirk v Kilmarnock they'd play it somewhere like Fir Park.

    As far as I know all votes of this kind are now voted on by the whole of the SPFL no getting this through should be no bother.

    I'd go with your proposal but it's too sensible to ever happen.



    One other change I'd make is to get rid of the stupid league names. They simply copied the names in use in England, even although they make no sense up here at all.

    I'd go back to Division One, Two, etc. Something simple and logical.

  18. #17
    @hibs.net private member Speedy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    8,478
    Quote Originally Posted by BSEJVT View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A straight 2nd v 11th for me

    I cant quite get why the team that finishes 3rd (sometimes a distant 3rd ) gets another crack at the whip.
    Keeps the league meaningful for longer. I'd keep 3rd and 4th in the playoffs.

    OPs suggestion sounds good to me.

  19. #18
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    13,151
    Quote Originally Posted by Keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd go with your proposal but it's too sensible to ever happen.



    One other change I'd make is to get rid of the stupid league names. They simply copied the names in use in England, even although they make no sense up here at all.

    I'd go back to Division One, Two, etc. Something simple and logical.
    Correct.

    In England the Championship is just that - it decides the Football League Champions who then move into a different competition organised by the Premiership.

    In Scotland all four leagues are organised by the one body, so only the winners of the top flight can be called champions.
    Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.

  20. #19
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,586
    Two up, up two down.

    Simples.

    J

  21. #20
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    I would keep things much the same but make the Premiership play off a one off match at Hampden.

    The idea of the play-offs is to keep interest going throughout the season. There are very few meaningless mid-table matches as a result.

    I would still prefer the league to be restructured into two Divisions of 20 clubs with the playoff system retained.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)