Results 1 to 30 of 372
Thread: Oxley in versus Rangers...
-
18-04-2016 05:41 PM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2016
- Posts
- 138
Oxley in versus Rangers...
-
-
-
18-04-2016 05:46 PM #4
I hope that's NOT true. Unless Stubbs is wanting to use Logan as some kind of secret weapon and save him for the final...
-
-
18-04-2016 05:47 PM #6
Huge mistake.
It's unlikely Logan would ever have another game quite as flawless as Saturday but he earned the right to play on Tuesday. I don't mind Oxley but you have got to go with the hot hands.
Stubbs isn't going to get away with this one quietly me thinks and could be made to regret the decision.
And in the worst position is Oxley who is on a hiding to nothing.
-
18-04-2016 05:48 PM #7
The quote 'as long as Mark is available he will be back in' is a bit concerning.
I'm aware there is context but that shouldn't be the case for any player imo.
Nowt against Oxley, I've both praised and criticised him. Stubbs has heaped huge pressure on him now though.
-
18-04-2016 05:49 PM #8
Bad decision from Stubbs, sends out completely the wrong message to Oxley.
If I was Logan I'd be p****d.
-
-
18-04-2016 05:52 PM #10
I'll lose all remaining faith in stubbs if oxley is back in.
I'd actually feel sorry for mark as he is literally on a hiding to nothing unless he has his best ever game for us. The pressure on him will be immense, which can't be a good thing.
-
-
18-04-2016 05:53 PM #12
Fact of the matter is we'd have been beaten on Saturday if oxley had been in goal. Stubbs can GTF as far as I'm concerned
-
18-04-2016 05:54 PM #13
Madness if true, Wednesday provides a fantastic opportunity to let Logan experience playing against them in the horrible, vile atmosphere they generate.
Also gives the fans a chance to show there appreciation after his heroics on Saturday.
This is a perfect opportunity to give a new keeper a chance at a time we have been fighting amongst ourselves about whether OX should be dropped.
Maybe Stubbsy wants to keep Logan out the limelight and throw him back in for the final.
-
18-04-2016 05:55 PM #14
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,869
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Logan should start.
-
18-04-2016 05:57 PM #15
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Preston
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 416
So his reason for putting him back in is because " he's my number one" Forget the fact he's been poor for 3 months now and has IMO contributed to our form as it's clear to see the defence has no confidence in him either. You only have to see the sheer panic from our back 4 every time the opposition get near our box to know that. ***** decision
-
18-04-2016 05:58 PM #16
Well if he is back in then hopefully the fans will give him 100% backing from the start. It's not Oxley's fault that Logan was brilliant on Saturday.
-
-
18-04-2016 05:59 PM #18
Logan deserves the gloves and should be his to lose imo. Disappointed if Oxley starts and I feel it's the wrong decision
-
18-04-2016 05:59 PM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-04-2016 06:00 PM #20
What incentive is there for anyone being drafted into the starting 11 to work their arse off when you can have a perfect game and still not retain the position in the following game?
It's as if Stubbs is trying his hardest to make it look like he isn't one to make knee-jerk changes to his tactics (diamond formation) and team selection (latterly, Boyle) in a bid to demonstrate that he knows exactly what he's doing. Actually, for me, all it does is make me have even less confidence in him.
-
18-04-2016 06:02 PM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That concerns me as well.
Sounds very closed minded.
-
18-04-2016 06:03 PM #22hfc rdLeft by mutual consent!
You're surely having a f****** laugh Stubbs!
Crazy to drop Conrad. Plus a big must win game tomorrow if we want 2nd spot.
-
18-04-2016 06:03 PM #23
Surely Logan's performance merits his place ?
What type of message is that to the fringe players ?
I'll be surprised if Oxley starts the next match .No Eternal Reward Shall Forgive Us Now For Wasting The Dawn
-
-
18-04-2016 06:06 PM #25
I wonder if Logan just isn't fit enough for our schedule between now and the end of the season so Stubbs knows he'll need to use him sparingly.
-
18-04-2016 06:07 PM #26
Sorry he's got this very wrong if it's true. I'm not an Oxley hater but after that performance from Logan on Sat he has to start. If Ox does have a poor game and now there's more pressure on him then the fans will go mental.
-
18-04-2016 06:08 PM #27This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think he will, sometimes you just don't believe everything the manager says to the press.
Big lad would be gutted to lose his place after Saturday's performance.
And Oxley could have no complaints if he did get dropped.Last edited by silverhibee; 18-04-2016 at 06:10 PM.
-
18-04-2016 06:08 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteNo Eternal Reward Shall Forgive Us Now For Wasting The Dawn
-
18-04-2016 06:09 PM #29This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-04-2016 06:09 PM #30
IF Oxley does play on Wed then that must rate as one of the worst decisions EVER made by Stubbs. He totally contradicts himself in the article, first he says " as long as Mark is here he is my No 1" them goes on to say " every player is playing for his place " ? WTF ? If he picks an outfield player who has an outstanding game in his position, surely he retains his place in the starting 11, as , after all, he was replacing an off-form player in the first place. So, given that, why do the rules change just because it is a goalkeeper we are talking about ? It's not as if Oxley is such an outstanding keeper in the first place. Total madness not to start with Logan, total madness.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks