Raith V Rangers disallowed goal

[allmodcons]

At about 7.00 minutes check out the elbow missed by ref where he has a great view and then take a look at the disallowed goal from Raith at 7.30 minutes.

For what it's worth, I think it was a foul on lead up to disallowed goal but, as ever, where is the consistency.

http://www.raithrovers.net/raithtv

[Kato]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

At about 7.00 minutes check out the elbow missed by ref where he has a great view and then take a look at the disallowed goal from Raith at 7.30 minutes.

For what it's worth, I think it was a foul on lead up to disallowed goal but, as ever, where is the consistency.

http://www.raithrovers.net/raithtv

The Raith players jumps and wins the ball. He's going for the ball and the Rangers player is bundled over in that action, something you see every week (game?) and usually not given as a foul.

[DH1875]

Never a foul.

[Super_JMcGinn]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

At about 7.00 minutes check out the elbow missed by ref where he has a great view and then take a look at the disallowed goal from Raith at 7.30 minutes.

For what it's worth, I think it was a foul on lead up to disallowed goal but, as ever, where is the consistency.

http://www.raithrovers.net/raithtv

Agreed, I think had it been Hanlon challenged like that we would have been looking for the foul. whether we would have got it is another matter.
I haven't seen any mention of the guy on sportsound, ex Rangers player, saying the incident was irrelevant as Rangers, courtesy of their 1st half dominance deserved to win. Came across as a right arrogant so and so.

[hibees 7062]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

At about 7.00 minutes check out the elbow missed by ref where he has a great view and then take a look at the disallowed goal from Raith at 7.30 minutes.

For what it's worth, I think it was a foul on lead up to disallowed goal but, as ever, where is the consistency.

http://www.raithrovers.net/raithtv

The guy needed stiches in his mouth , Halliday again

[Geo_1875]

Never a foul as far as I'm concerned. However, the referee was so convinced it was a free kick that he blew his whistle before any contact took place.

[GreenLake]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The guy needed stiches in his mouth , Halliday again

They should give a retrospective red card for that nasty elbow to the face.

[21.05.2016]

"Operation get the Rangers promoted" in full swing I see.

[Mikey09]

So Halliday elbows the boy in the gub... No foul, play on.

Raith player wins a clean header without using his elbows... Foul, goal disallowed.

[hibees 7062]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

They should give a retrospective red card for that nasty elbow to the face.

Absolutely

[21.05.2016]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

So Halliday elbows the boy in the gub... No foul, play on.

Raith player wins a clean header without using his elbows... Foul, goal disallowed.

It's the huns we're talking about here so yep that sounds about right!

[Pete]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

"Operation get the Rangers promoted" in full swing I see.

Nobody wants to be the ref that denied the Billy boys their rightful place in the top flight.

Probably have their life made a misery. Good old Scotland.

[Carheenlea]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Agreed, I think had it been Hanlon challenged like that we would have been looking for the foul. whether we would have got it is another matter.
I haven't seen any mention of the guy on sportsound, ex Rangers player, saying the incident was irrelevant as Rangers, courtesy of their 1st half dominance deserved to win. Came across as a right arrogant so and so.

Derek Ferguson.
Was listening in on way back from Greenock, and the way the Raith manager went on about it in his post match interview I was expecting to be viewing a hugely blatant injustice. Can`t see why it wasn`t a foul - Raith player has gone in aggressively, and despite winning the ball first a foul has still been committed. As you point out, if one of Neilson/Levein`s hammer throwers crashes through Hanlon like that on Sunday we are screaming for a foul all day long.

[Sammy7nil]

If it was against Hibs we would want a freekick but i am not sure you would get one. For me no free kick. As for the elbow it is a freekick and a booking the player looks at the Raith before the challange.

[greenginger]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

They should give a retrospective red card for that nasty elbow to the face.

Somebody needs to pass the footage on to Compliance Officer.

He won't go looking for it himself.

[JimBHibees]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The guy needed stiches in his mouth , Halliday again

Think it was Ball rather than Halliday. Should be a red. Ref had perfect view. No foul for goal either.

[OsloHibs]

Do we expect anything else?

[wookie70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

So Halliday elbows the boy in the gub... No foul, play on.

Raith player wins a clean header without using his elbows... Foul, goal disallowed.

That's been the rules in Scottish football for the 40 years I have watched it.

[Boyle89]

Reminded me a lot of when hanlon was chopped down and the ref let sevco play on and score. Except this time the foul was given...strange that.

[Gogs07]

Raith fan at work said that the ball was won with a clean header and then the goal was scored and then disallowed due to the momentum of the Raith player knocking into the stagnant der Hun defender after winning the header.

[MWHIBBIES]

Compare this to the absolute shambles of a decision to allow Rangers 2nd goal against us last season at ER. Either both count or neither count. Strange that both decisions went the huns way...