Diving barsteward. Do refs not watch MOTD?
Results 1 to 30 of 36
Thread: Suarez
-
-
18-01-2014 10:04 PM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-01-2014 10:09 PM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
18-01-2014 10:10 PM #4
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,962
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Did he go down easily? Yes
Did Guzan touch the ball? No
Did he impede a goalscoring opportunity? Yes
Was it a penalty? 100%
-
18-01-2014 10:11 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Not a fan of Suarez but he didn't do much wrong tonight imo.PM Awards General Poster of The Year 2015, 2016, 2017. Probably robbed in other years
-
-
-
18-01-2014 10:14 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote#PERSEVERED
-
18-01-2014 10:17 PM #9
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,962
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
18-01-2014 10:20 PM #11
No contact but a ridiculous decision from Guzan. There was no need to go to ground
-
18-01-2014 10:26 PM #12
Bugs me when keepers go in for that type of challenge. Nine times out of ten it's a pen, just let the defenders do their job and you stick to stopping shots.
-
18-01-2014 10:27 PM #13
It was Guzan's failure to pull out of the challenge that made the ref's mind up for me. He had more than ample opportunity to pull his arms away, but kept them extended. It was definitely a pen for me.
-
18-01-2014 10:37 PM #14
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 10,644
Stonewaller for me. He may have gone down easily but it was a foul in the box
-
19-01-2014 12:22 AM #15
Pen. End of.
FWIW I love Suarez.
Munching apart, he's the best player on the planet.
-
19-01-2014 09:40 AM #16
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Judea
- Posts
- 11,310
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
19-01-2014 09:49 AM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
having looked at it from 57 different angles... its probably soft.
-
19-01-2014 04:42 PM #18
Pat Nevin providing a lone sane voice in amongst MOTD tossers arguing the modern mantra that 'There was contact therefore he was entitled to go down':
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25802012
-
19-01-2014 04:51 PM #19
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 2,519
I think it was a penalty. Stupidity from Guzan...especially as I had a bet on Villa
-
19-01-2014 04:56 PM #20
The problem with the "there was contact so it's a penalty" argument is that the players are instigating the contact by hanging their leg out when going past the defender. Surely that's a form of simulation? If a forward goes past the player and there's contact fair enough, but that's not the way it's happening, the worrying thing is that it's seems to be accepted as ok by the pundits and the governing bodies.
-
19-01-2014 05:00 PM #21
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 2,519
I think if the football authorities starting hitting players and/or clubs in their pockets for diving it would soon stop.
-
19-01-2014 05:47 PM #22
Guzan didn't touch him, but it's a stonewaller?
'twas a dive.
Cheating wee turd.
-
19-01-2014 06:22 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
agree totally !!
-
19-01-2014 06:23 PM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Have another look ( or two ) THERE WAS A TOUCH
-
19-01-2014 07:13 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If a player goes down when he could have stayed up, it's a dive IMO.
I really don't agree with this 'entitled to go down' nonsense.
-
19-01-2014 07:21 PM #26
It was a penalty,anyone who thinks otherwise hasnae a ***** clue
.Last edited by Scouse Hibee; 19-01-2014 at 07:35 PM.
-
19-01-2014 07:30 PM #27
Used to be that it had to be a foul before it was a penalty, but now if there is contact it is a penalty. Everyone knows that. When i was watching the game, as soon as I saw him go wide, it was 100% nailed on that he would fall over. 100%. If I know that, then the 'keeper should know that as well and think accordingly.
Would appear that the old Rangers forward John McDonald, was way, way ahead of him time when he was doing this in the early 80's. He would be worth a fortune now.
-
19-01-2014 07:33 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If you have played football at all you will know that if you are running at pace and there is contact with the lower part of your body it is 99% certain you will go down .
I am not defending Suarez overall ( he has history !!) just this instance which I feel the Ref got 100% right .
-
-
19-01-2014 07:55 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks