http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/f...takes-2866705?
can't disagree with anything that he says
Results 1 to 19 of 19
Thread: Handling has a pop at Fenlon
-
30-11-2013 11:13 AM #1
Handling in the Daily Record
Last edited by Winston Ingram; 30-11-2013 at 11:23 AM.
-
30-11-2013 11:14 AM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2013 11:22 AM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2013 11:30 AM #4
Hanlon at right mid? Fenlon really didn't have a clue :
Solid journalism from the DR once again.
-
30-11-2013 11:33 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2013 11:41 AM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I was wondering that as well.
Of course "Handling happy to be playing in favoured position" isn't quite so dramatic a headline
-
30-11-2013 11:41 AM #7
I'm not sorry Fenlon's gone but the story could easily be, "Under 21's get first team football under progressive manager. Playing in positions they are unused to, it shows the faith the manager had in them to adapt."
I'm still in the players often don't know their best positions.... Having said that Danny I think is suited to "the hole"
-
30-11-2013 11:48 AM #8
My recollection is that Handling was playing in his favoured position just before he got injured.
-
30-11-2013 11:49 AM #9
Should younger players looking for a breakthrough not be happy to play anywhere?
-
30-11-2013 11:50 AM #10
Yeh another case of a red rag trying to cause controversy to sell papers. To be fair I think Danny was probable very frustrated not being able to play his best, but he didn't say anything untoward in that interview. It wouldn't do anyone any good if he really came out against Fenlon. Hope he gets a new lease of life again, shows signs of a quality player.
-
30-11-2013 11:50 AM #11
Awful article. Noone else notice that they spelt Fenlon wrong in the headline!! FFS, how poor is that?!? Also Hanlon instead of Handling and it says that Fenlon got sacked when he didn't. Heard just yesterday that Handling is really enjoying working under Terry, however he also had a lot of time/respect for Fenlon for giving him his chance. Source was Danny himself.
-
30-11-2013 11:53 AM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2013 11:55 AM #13This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2013 12:01 PM #14
The only really good game where I've seen him change the flow completely is against Falkirk when he played right midfield. There was also a game this season before his injury against Ross County I think where he was probably MOTM at right midfield.
I'm sure he'll be good upfront, he just has to go prove it (today would be a nice start)
-
30-11-2013 12:38 PM #15
Ive never really rated him when he was playing at right midfield, I dont think he had either the pace or the trickery to really take a man on. I suppose Im a bit surprised he sees himself as a number 10 (even though he played there last weekend) as again, I think it takes a certain amount of skill and vision to play in that role. Im happy to be proved wrong by him though and hopefully if he is happier there, he will start performing every week!
-
30-11-2013 01:49 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
No. The idea is to bring on a young player until he's ready to take a regular place in the first team - it's about education and development, and playing a player out of position does nothing for his education or his development.
The place for experimentation is on the training ground, not on the pitch on matchday. Some players can slot into different positions in the side, but I remember Jim O'Rourke being labelled a "utility player" at ER and spending years in and out of the team until Turnbull started playing him regularly in his natural position - just behind and beside Alan Gordon.
In the days of one sub, Jimmy would be that sub, and could find himself playing at left-back, right-midfield, centre-forward - I think the only place he didn't play was in goal, and that was because Arthur Duncan was our replacement keeper. When the goalie was injured, Jimmy ended up on the left wing.
A manager can ruin a young player by insisting he plays in a position that isn't his natural one. John Blackley started off in the RB position, and really didn't look awfully impressive. When he moved to sweeper, he was a revelation - one of the best defenders I've ever seen. Joe Jordan started off as a player who could either play at centre forward or at centre-back. He only blossomed when he was played consistently at centre-forward.
Play a player in his (or her) natural position, and you'll get the best out of that player, and the best for your team.
-
30-11-2013 03:13 PM #17
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Posts
- 3,376
The only player no to be oot o position was the goalie.
**** useless ****.
-
30-11-2013 06:24 PM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2013 06:48 PM #19
The problem with trash journalism like this is that the player gets marked as a tattletale when in fact he simply stated the facts.
This is how it feels
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks