Does anyone know our 'goals against' record with Lewis at right back, and what the average goals against per match is?
I'm not making Lewis a scapegoat, far from it - he's one of the few players who rarely lets us down. Instead I'm looking for statistical evidence to show how bad a decision by the manager it is to persist with Lewis at right back.
Results 1 to 30 of 98
Thread: Stevenson at right back
-
30-09-2013 08:31 AM #1
Stevenson at right back
-
30-09-2013 08:43 AM #2
Can't think of any goals we have conceded this season that were a result of the RB channe Lewis has played? Not saying there isn't any but i can't think. Saturdays as example was a Nelson Williams mistake, poor CH play then a good finish from BM
-
30-09-2013 08:49 AM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This is not about criticising Lewis, far from it.Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
30-09-2013 08:59 AM #4
Stevenson is an appalling RB, yet he has a fan club on this site where he can take no criticism.
For the record I like LS and think he's a great player to have to play/cover on the left, in fact I hope he plays LB on Monday.
I don't blame LS though, he's the type of guy that will do whatever he's asked and give it his best, blame is with Pat Fenlon for a; persistently playing him at RB b; not providing sufficient cover in this position when our No1 RB is a major doubt that he will ever pay again or be up to standard.
LS good wee player, a RB he is not!
-
30-09-2013 09:13 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteFollow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
30-09-2013 09:17 AM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Lewis like any other player deserves praise when playing well and criticism when playing bad however Lewis like Hanlon seem to take it in turns to get it tight from folk on here when others seem to be immune to it.
That unfortunately will never change.
-
30-09-2013 09:27 AM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-09-2013 09:36 AM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-09-2013 09:37 AM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
i agree he's not a RB but not sure I'm convinced it's as big an issue as some might think.
i think we should be more aware of the nightmare Nelson had and McGivern by the looks of things on the highlights also.
-
30-09-2013 09:41 AM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteFollow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
30-09-2013 09:43 AM #11
I think the only game you could really point the finger at Stevenson for losing goals at RB is the Malmo game (if he played there, I've blocked a lot from my memory!)
He has been pretty solid at RB for us since the Dundee Utd game
-
30-09-2013 09:47 AM #12
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 17,111
The whole team suffers when he plays there, more so when have the ball. Look at the Stmirren game when Maybury overlapped Robertson, put the ball across and we scored. Similar thing on Saturday where Stevenson goes past Stanton who plays the ball to him. Instead of the ball going across he has to try and cut back on to his left foot, loses the ball, and the chance is gone.
When Mullen got hooked in the first half of the Dundee Utd game and Lewis had to go to right back you only needed to see his reaction to see how he really feels about playing there.
-
30-09-2013 09:55 AM #13
Stevenson on the left has mostly done a very good job when starting or coming on. He makes mistakes and is slaughtered like no other player when he does. Yet we saw on Saturday our wonderful keeper make another howler that resulted in a goal, but he's the best we've had since whoever?
And Nelson?????????
Stevenson on the right does not work for one reason, he cuts inside all the time. He plays balls into the congested midfield, and the pitch is made narrower because of his one sided play. He wont get forward on the right the way he does on the left, and the team is very unbalanced with him on the right.
I never rated him a few seasons ago, but he won me over during the last couple of seasons. I'd say he's been worth his contract renewal for his performances during that time, but Fenlon is hanging him out to dry by putting him right back.
He will get stuck in on the right, and he will defend reasonably well, but as a unit we will be poorer with him there, and the defense won't get forward as much to support the midfield and play won't flow from the right hand side as much as it would if he was playing on the left.
-
30-09-2013 10:02 AM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-09-2013 10:05 AM #15This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
He can play well there IMO. But Fenlon probably wasnt banking on Mullen being as poor as hes been, which is the root of the problem. Assuming Maybury cant do it every week, we do need to sign a right back though.
-
30-09-2013 10:07 AM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-09-2013 10:17 AM #17
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 17,111
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
In that particular game he handled McKay-Steven well. But as I said, the issue with Stevenson at right back is more when we have the ball than when defending IMO.
-
30-09-2013 10:45 AM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The right back fiasco is entirely down to Fenlon. David Gold would have provided much a better option in there while gaining first team experience and showing the our crab style midfielders the benefits of playing forward passes. Lewis would have been able to play with greater confidence on his natural left side but heyho its what Fenlon does all the time.... he consistently puts guys on the wrong side of the park and midfielders who revel in side to back passing at a slow tempo making it easy for the oppo to retreat and organise themselves.
-
-
30-09-2013 11:08 AM #20
Keenan, Stevenson and there have been others. Over the years players consistently playing when either out of position or needing dropped. It leads me to wonder (and Pat himself not more than 2 weeks ago said that playing LS there upsets the balance of the team) whether it is some bizarre way of a manager saying to Rod look we need to strengthen in this area but this is what you've given me...
For the record my position on LS is supportive - I was saying to Matty_F at the cup game I wondered whether LS would go through his entire Hibs career playing out of position..."We know the people who have invested so far are simple fans." Vladimir Romanov - Scotsman 10th December 2012
"Romanov was like a breath of fresh air - laced with cyanide." Me.
-
30-09-2013 11:18 AM #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 1,535
LS is a left-sided central midfielder, isn't he? Can't remember the last time I saw him there! Against Dundee at he end of the season? I thought he played great in that match (granted I had work so had to leave 25 mins in)
I still don't know why Taiwo has not been tested at RB; he's tenacious and quick and works hard. If he has a cross then we're onto a winner. I think he could potentially make the position his own.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
-
30-09-2013 11:23 AM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Lewis has had good games at right back individually, but do those good performances equate to a more solid defence?
You could look at how Bamba was played when we used him as a defensive midfielder. Individually he played well but it meant our midfield sat too deep and caused us problems.Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
30-09-2013 11:34 AM #23
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 1,155
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
On the Stevenson issue, I think he does well for what he has in his locker but if you want a Hibs team who will challenge for 2nd place (as we should be) we need better.
-
30-09-2013 11:35 AM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-09-2013 11:40 AM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-09-2013 11:44 AM #26
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 1,535
I think regardless of how good LS does at RB (I'm a big fan of his), the team's balance is off with him there; he's too one footed to do it seamlessly, and because of this, he can only do what he can with his left, so therefore, he's guaranteed to cut in, and that's very easy pickings for opposing teams to exploit. It'd be easy for you or I to exploit as it's a guarantee!
My outlook (and I'm sure most other people's) on team building is to to play your players to their strengths, and I think Fenlon's approach is to play his players to the best way he think his team should counter the other team's game plan, regardless of his players' strengths or weaknesses, and hope that they get the job done.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
-
30-09-2013 11:48 AM #27This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Is it still the best defensive record up til now? We lost 2 goals to Stranraer with Lewis at right back, then 3 at Inverness. That's 14 over four games!Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
30-09-2013 11:50 AM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteFollow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
30-09-2013 11:50 AM #29
The bottom line is that we don't appear to have a long term right back solution at the club.
Clancy is never fit, Maybury is 37 and Mullen is apparently not good enough. Surely Fenlon should have known whether Mullen was ready to play in the SPL when signing him.
We could have taken the wages for the latter 2 or Vine/OTJ (players that aren't adding any value to the squad IMO) and offered Tom Hateley a deal. Or surely another RB of a good standard.
Instead we're left with this fiasco of Lewis at RB and hoping that Clancy can get fit and start performing.
Fenlon is responsible.
-
30-09-2013 11:54 AM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There's also 3 other people in that defence and I'd go as far as to say Nelson has cost us more goals than Stevenson.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks