The 1st 3 goals we lost were terrible, nil up front causing any threat and v little positive about that performance.
If pat Fenlon cannot see our defence is awful then he is the wrong man for the job
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: Defence needed
-
25-07-2013 09:42 PM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 1,668
Defence needed
-
25-07-2013 09:51 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Age
- 55
- Posts
- 2,206
was in malmo and I thought that Hanlon as left back was excellent again tonight he was the only one who looked solid until McPake went off and he went back into central defence. Maybe if we keep him at left back we would have 1 out of 4 positions covered. GGTTH.
-
25-07-2013 09:53 PM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 38
Hanlon left back with McGivern in the centre is definitely the way I'd go to start the season.
-
25-07-2013 09:57 PM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Just the 1st and 3rd??
-
25-07-2013 09:58 PM #5
Their front 3 ripped us to bits every time they came forward .
The number 29 was just awesome.
I think our whole team was guff, especially the defence, but we ain't going to be facing that sort of class every week.
-
-
25-07-2013 10:50 PM #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,038
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hanlon has no pace. Ball over top and he's out they game. He can't sense danger.
-
25-07-2013 11:03 PM #8
Mcpake was slow and a liability, Stevenson very flat as a full back - happy for both not to feature frequently this year. Must get a strong CH or could be seriously fooled this season
-
25-07-2013 11:05 PM #9
Defence was gash no doubt about it but the midfield didnt track the runners and that cost us.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks