Delighted with the result today but was a bit worried about Maybury this afternoon, seemed to stray out of position into the middle and leave a lot of space down our right flank, which a better team than St Mirren could have taken advantage of. Anyone else notice this? I think RB is his preferred position but I'm not sure why we start him over Clancy.
Results 1 to 25 of 25
Thread: Maybury at RB
-
03-11-2012 07:13 PM #1
Maybury at RB
-
03-11-2012 07:15 PM #2
I thought second half in particular he looked a lot safer option than Clancy, albeit partly because Wotherspoon pushing forward meant St Mirren's left side had to drop deeper.
-
03-11-2012 07:15 PM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
He doesn't like to go too far forward, but he's experienced enough to know his position
-
-
03-11-2012 07:18 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 07:20 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 2,064
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Clancy is injured.
-
03-11-2012 07:21 PM #7
We were shocking down the right hand side till Cairney came over. The amount of times they seemed to have a man over was frighting. Maybury was indeed to central and left the wide man loads of room. If that wide man had been better (or McGowan for instance)we would have been dead and buried at half time.
3pts in the bag though.
-
03-11-2012 07:25 PM #8
Clancy wasn't fit (groin strain I think) and he is really just here as cover for defence and usually does OK but Imrie took him to the cleaners in the first half today ,
at one point tempting him into midfield and allowing Mclean to run wide and set up a chance. He will never be first choice I don't think but as back up he can do a job.
-
03-11-2012 08:01 PM #9
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 2,710
Imrie is not a bad player and Maybury had his hands full.
He is not the player he was but stuck at it.
What got to me today was that with the crowds getting bigger the critics are back. The number of East Stand loudmouths who couldn't kick their granny really got my goat.
If you can't back the team then STAY AWAY!!!!!!!!
Wotherspoon, Maybury, Taiwo, Doyle, McPake, Claros were all getting it in the neck at one stage or another.
Oh, where are we? Oh yes.......... TOP OF THE LEAGUE.
-
03-11-2012 08:16 PM #10
he was beat for pace but done the simple things and done them well. thought mcpake did have a poor game, but as we are currently secon. . . sorry, TOP of the league, then you know what . . . who cares. lets focus on the positives of the game and lets build from there! GGTTH
-
03-11-2012 08:18 PM #11
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 542
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 08:20 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 08:22 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,443
All through the first half he was constantly beaten down the right and that's where all their chances came from, not just a lack of pace but he was invariably 5 - 10 yards behind their winger when the ball was played.
Didn't hurt us much in the end today, but it could have. Hopefully we can tighten up on that side of things going forward.
-
03-11-2012 08:23 PM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,443
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 08:53 PM #15
As I have said on match marks threads - i think the tactics were wrong with maybury asked to tuck in and cover for McPakes man. McPake had a total mare (must be his injury?) and it made Maybury and in turn spoony look lost in 1st half. why have a RB mark one of 2 CF's? when eventually the system was changed to 4-4-1-1 we looked a fair bit better
-
03-11-2012 09:03 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 09:06 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 09:34 PM #18
I said at the start of the season and I stand by it now; the position we are coming from and the budget we have means that players like Maybury are very important.
The guy isn't fantastic but he's a steady squad player. If things continue to improve and finances hold up then at the end of the season we can give him a handshake and a thanks very much and let him go. Until that time we have to accept he'll be steady but unspectacular. After watching some of the jokers to pull on the shirt over the last couple of seasons, I'll accept a Maybury type anyday.
-
03-11-2012 09:39 PM #19
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Musselburgh
- Posts
- 3,604
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 09:48 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 10:34 PM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
03-11-2012 10:45 PM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-11-2012 05:26 AM #23
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 3,865
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-11-2012 06:10 AM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Spot on mate. Maybury may not set the heather on fire but IMHO is more than solid enough. Folk have very very short memories... Bottom or near bottom of league and players are getting it tight.... Top of league and a vast improvement on last season (still long way to go tho) and they're still getting it tight.
Players will have off days however we have others in the team now who will roll up their sleeves and help their team mate out.
FFS give the team some credit.
-
04-11-2012 07:26 AM #25
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,778
Marbury was left exsposed by McPake not tracking Thompson and Spoonys refusal to track back in the first half. It was sorted at HT. McPake picked up Thompson and came of second best and Imrie drifted out the game
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks