hibs.net Messageboard

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Lomas punishment

    Lomas receives a two match suspended ban for saying:
    "It was a push from Munro first, and Viney just turns round, the actual reaction from the player is a disgrace if I'm being honest. Viney just put his chest out. For the big man to fall down like that; you'd expect that off a wee forward, but not from a big strong centre-half. Pretty poor, pretty poor."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20173780

    Shiels receives nothing, not even a warning for saying this:

    “He ran straight into my player looking for a penalty. I’m not criticising the referee by the way, but when the video evidence comes up I feel that player should be suspended. I don’t like diving."

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/f...nock-1-1326609

    Is there a difference between the two. In both, they are critical of a player from another team, blaming them for simulation.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    Professional thread starter Diclonius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West Fife
    Age
    32
    Posts
    23,282
    Shiels is a media darling and that apparently matters more than the severity of the comment.

  4. #3
    @hibs.net private member easty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    40
    Posts
    14,206
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: hibee_easty
    I got a 4 match ban from amateur footie for telling the ref his performance was a disgrace and he ruined the game a few weeks ago. Maybe they're clamping down in the word 'disgrace'..

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)