Jim Spence asks? From his blog, it is interesting to look at the average attendances for 1948/49.
Aberdeen 24,200
Dundee 24,532
Celtic 37,171
Hearts 28,196
Hibernian 27,627
Rangers 44,600
It was a boom period post-war for the game and the clubs outside of the Glasgow pair never came close to repeating those enormous crowds. However, while the Glasgow two were still better supported, the gap was much narrower than now and often the two were split by other clubs in the race for the top prize.
Dundee were pipped by one point as Rangers took the title in 1949. The season before, Hibs took the title by two points from Rangers and Celtic finished 12th. In 1950, Rangers again nabbed the top spot, one point ahead of Hibs, who were followed by Hearts, East Fife then Celtic. The following year, Hibs were champions with Rangers and Dundee level on points behind them. It is a snapshot of a time when Scottish football was much more competitive than today. Is it simply wishful thinking that we can find a way to reinvigorate our game and bring a real competitive edge back to it?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/jimspence...ut_change.html
Probably, almost certainly, the teams outwith the Old Firm will never get as close in terms of average attendances. What a great pity!
Results 1 to 30 of 65
-
09-09-2012 05:23 PM #1
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 5,841
Can big crowds ever return to Scottish football?
-
09-09-2012 05:32 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,443
The Old Firm only have the crowds they do through a mixture of always winning things, and for many of their fans, the sheer hate fuelled rivalry between them. Two years from now I wonder how full Ibrox and Parkhead will be...
As for the rest of us, crowds would be bigger if it was cheaper to go first and foremost, a better, more interesting product, a less repetitive and more competitive league set up would also help, but really, it's cost. A guy at my work summed it up perfectly when he said a game shouldn't cost more than an amount that would 'make you think,' basically priced at a point so that if someone suggested going a long, you'd just agree without thinking, say it was £10 - £15 for a basic seat, which isn't far off the cost of going to the cinema really, you'd get far, far more walk ups. Whether that would lead to more revenue overall I don't know, but you'd get more bodies a long.
-
09-09-2012 05:46 PM #3
No, because what you've seen in football over the last 20 years or so is a massive concentration of power in the hands of an elite. It's the same all over Europe. Even the Old Firm, who initially benefitted from this, are now realising that they are locked out of this elite because it favours clubs from the handful of countries with large TV markets.
-
09-09-2012 05:50 PM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-09-2012 05:53 PM #5
The season you're talking about would still have seen gate money split between home and away teams. If that happened again then the gap between the rest of the teams and the OF might shorten, but as it sits right now they have too much financial muscle.
-
09-09-2012 06:00 PM #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-09-2012 06:07 PM #7
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Back in the town
- Age
- 60
- Posts
- 11,876
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-09-2012 06:09 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-09-2012 06:13 PM #9
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
For those that are working it out £12 in 1947 would be equivalent to £395.04 today. Even we could compete with that I think.
-
-
09-09-2012 06:36 PM #11
Take live football of the tele, and if people want to see it there is only one way they can do that.
-
09-09-2012 06:43 PM #12
The season you pointed to was during a period that was completely out of the ordinary for crowds at football matches. Apparently, it was largely related to the feeling of the population after the war. As pointed out by other posters, many clubs had fantastic teams and there wasn't as much incentive for players to move clubs.
It would be more realistic to point to the average attendances between say 1920 and 1980. I'd be willing to bet that the average attendance over that time for most clubs was about the same as it is now (except the OF, who have gone through the highest point in their histories in the last 15-20 years).
-
09-09-2012 06:44 PM #13
Ticket prices have risen disproportionately. Back in those days going to the football wouldn't have blown such a massive hole in the budget. Many factors include the spiralling players wages and the fact attendances are capped by all-seater stadia I'd guess.
-
09-09-2012 06:49 PM #14
In 1948 there was little else to do but go to the fitba on a Saturday afternoon
-
-
09-09-2012 07:30 PM #16
3pm KO on a Saturday, when the word weekend meant something, retailers closed half day and a day out meant going somewhere not shopping!
-
09-09-2012 07:47 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
How come Matt Busby, Bobby Johnstone, Dave Ewing, Andy Black, Jacie Plenderleith and Alex Herd played for Manchester City? I could add Bill Shankley and Tommy Docherty playing for Preston North End amongst numerous others.
-
09-09-2012 08:24 PM #18
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Back in the town
- Age
- 60
- Posts
- 11,876
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It isn't that long ago wages between Hibs and what are now middle ranking EPL clubs were more or less the same.
-
09-09-2012 08:27 PM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteEvery gimmick hungry yob,
Digging gold from rock and roll
Grabs the mic to tell us,
He'll die before he's sold.
-
09-09-2012 08:32 PM #20
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Back in the town
- Age
- 60
- Posts
- 11,876
What did they have EBTs even then?
-
09-09-2012 08:47 PM #21
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 2,675
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That continued into the 80s when the Aberdeen and Dundee United teams were able to retain the majority of their stars. I believe Willie Miller got an offer from Rangers to leave Aberdeen, but didn't think it was worth moving for the increase on offer. The great Dundee United of that time were said to be on poor basic pay (and long contracts), but could make huge sums from win bonuses and wouldn't have been much better off by moving south or west.
Going back to the original subject of the thread the answer is probably no. When I started attending ER I could go there for about the same price as a cinema ticket. If I'd had to pay three times the price of a movie it's unlikely I'd have become a regular, purely for financial reasons.
-
09-09-2012 08:53 PM #22
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Johny foreigner was pretty junk at this time as well.
-
09-09-2012 08:58 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
http://www.fitbastats.com/hibs/player.php?playerid=555This is how it feels
-
09-09-2012 09:03 PM #24
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
I am sure Fergie said something along the lines of when he joined ManU he couldnt return to Aberdeen for players as the guys there were on more money than was on offer at United. Though some players had been persuaded to make the switch (Strachan two years before Ferguson) it is clear the disparity in wages was minimal.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-09-2012 09:04 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-09-2012 09:13 PM #26
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 2,675
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-09-2012 09:33 PM #27
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There was movement as you say but, like Delaney, it was more of an even playing field, maybe because of the maximum wage in England.Last edited by Kaiser1962; 09-09-2012 at 09:36 PM.
-
09-09-2012 09:40 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
From personal memory from the late 60's to the late 90's there was a big percentage of Scots in any given English club side.
Just saying there was movement and plenty of it, despite no wage cap here.
-
09-09-2012 09:57 PM #29
I think Mikey and p/t nail the main points in this debate - but I think we need debate in Scotland about a blueprint for a way forward. Community clubs with outside funding is something I'm sure has been looked into. The problem with the spl years - since 1998 - is that our league is now more uncompetitive than its ever been, so who wants to watch that?
-
09-09-2012 10:06 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The other big difference - as I'm sure you remember - is that players prior to 1980? Simply couldn't move if clubs didn't release their registration - eg if lawrie Reilly had wanted to move and Hibs didn't want to let him go then he went nowhere. Different to now when players just run down their contract.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks