Or so it seems - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/mobile/football/17304341
OF GTF
Results 1 to 30 of 95
Thread: SPL will change
-
08-03-2012 05:27 PM #1
SPL will change
-
-
-
08-03-2012 05:31 PM #4
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dłn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 10,863
The 10 non-Old Firm SPL clubs have long been unhappy with the distribution of income as it favours Rangers and Celtic and also dislike an 11-1 majority requirement on major issues that they believe allows those two clubs to dictate change.
-
08-03-2012 05:34 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Fill yer boots.
All clubs in the Scottish Premier League, excluding Rangers and Celtic, will meet next week to discuss radical changes to Scottish football.
With Rangers in administration and facing going out of business, the clubs will discuss the voting structure.
They will also consider the distribution of income and the possibility of a 10-club second tier.
One SPL chairman told BBC Scotland: "This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change things."
The 10 non-Old Firm SPL clubs have long been unhappy with the distribution of income as it favours Rangers and Celtic and also dislike an 11-1 majority requirement on major issues that they believe allows those two clubs to dictate change.
An SPL2 has also long been mooted and, in 2007, the 30 Scottish Football League clubs voted 22-8 to reject talks about forming a second tier of the SPL.
The SPL clubs reached agreement in January 2011 for a 10-team top league and a second tier of 12 teams, but that plan failed to materialise following growing opposition from clubs who preferred to expand the present top tier.
"We will be looking at a number of things," said the SPL club chairman. "Changing the voting structure will be part of that.
"We are at a crossroads and need to meet for the future of the game.
"This is the best chance in the last 25 years to stop the Old Firm's domination of the game.
"The distribution of income, a 12-club SPL and a 10-club top league below that, with more income for the clubs below, will all be discussed.
"We don't have a lot of time to plan. But, if we get the right plan in place, we can all go the same route."
It appears that support for changes is gathering pace with Rangers in danger of going into liquidation, which could at least lead to the club leaving the SPL or going out of existence completely.
Another leading chairman said: "With the Old Firm having talked in the past about leaving Scottish football, we have had to think about a future without them.
"Part of that situation could be about to come true, so we have had time to think about how we would get on without them."
-
08-03-2012 05:37 PM #6
I like this bit..
Another leading chairman said: "With the Old Firm having talked in the past about leaving Scottish football, we have had to think about a future without them.
"Part of that situation could be about to come true, so we have had time to think about how we would get on without them."
-
08-03-2012 05:37 PM #7
Very positive news though as two un-named SPL chairmen talk about the need to break the OF's dominance, which if i am not mistaken would hopefully be held up should it come to a vote re RFC.
I think it was Andy74 that has been saying repeatedly that we would get an SPL2 before the new season and i think he is about to be proved right.
-
08-03-2012 05:38 PM #8
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 10,659
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Wonder of Vlad will be having a re-think about getting out of Scottish Football
-
08-03-2012 05:40 PM #9
So, who do we think the un-named SPL club chairmen are then? My guess is Petrie and Steven Thompson.
-
08-03-2012 05:43 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 05:56 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 05:57 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 06:08 PM #13
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dłn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 10,863
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
As far as I'm concerned anything that is done tae accommodate any new h** team is unacceptable and the creation of an SPL 2 would be just that if they are allowed in it.Last edited by Saorsa; 08-03-2012 at 06:23 PM.
-
08-03-2012 06:12 PM #14
Could it truly be the other clubs are about to go through a long awaited puberty and actually grow some balls? I'm almost beginning to believe it could be true!
I would lay bets that Hibs & petrie are leading this.
oh, sweet essence of giraffe, let it be so!
-
08-03-2012 06:14 PM #15
Just for a second lets pretend that rangers are just a big club, without the reasons we all have to hate them attached.
What a pity that it has taken the almost certain demise of one of the two biggest clubs in this country for the owners of the other 10 to finally realise that they have to do what the rest of us have been begging them to do for bloody years... I.E. grow a pair and change the current cartel like voting system !!!
By the way ... Sporting have just scored a brilliant goal
Anyway ... I just hope they dont go for this 10 and 12 option or whatever, even 14 and 14 would be better.
But at least they appear to be going to do so something .................. At last !!!
-
08-03-2012 06:20 PM #16
I for one aint getting any hopes up as of yet, it sounds extremely promising but as it says, in January 2011 nothing happened, and nothing is set in stone as of yet, but one things for sure another 10+ years of watching the OF rule the league sounds like murder
-
08-03-2012 06:24 PM #17
Looks promising
However, I don't get why this opportunity isn't being used to make even bigger changes.
As Rangers are looking less and less likely to even be in existence next season: why not change things further?
A 14 team SPL
A top7/bottom 7 split after 26 games, 6 games after that making a 32 games total.
Winnings would be done in their own wee league tables at the end of the season, with 70% of totals going to the top and 30% to the bottom. Eg, out of £5million in total (just for arguments sake, not sure about totals etc), £3.5 would go to the top, £1.5million to the bottom. Not sure how it would divide up exactly but it would be a lot fairer now than the HUGE discrepancy between the top 2 and the rest. Plus it gives a massive incentive to get in the top half.
Relegations would work a 2 up/2down system. The SPL 2/1st Division would have an automatic promotion and then a play-off between 3rd and 2nd. Bottom 2 in our league would be automatically relegated.
As it stands, with this idea these are the teams that would be in the league next season.
Celtic
Hearts
Hibs
Aberdeen
Dundee UTD
Kilmarnock
St Johnstone
ICT
St Mirren
Dunfermiline
Motherwell
Ross County
Falkirk
Livingston
Just an idea
-
08-03-2012 06:37 PM #18
This angers me greatly What's the need of an SPL2? It's nothing but the 1st division with a new name and infant it will cut yet more money off for the clubs left behind!
However the thing that really irks me is its just an excuse to parachute a new Rangers into the second tier of Scottish football instead of the 4th
Just wait and see, anybody who can't see the plan is blind, Scottish football still bending over for the OF! This will be a once only opportunity to shaft them, that won't be taken!
-
08-03-2012 06:53 PM #19
Agree that there is no need to rename Division One.
But I just hope that we're not expecting too much from this meeting. Reallistically it's an opportunity to restore some balance in the SPL and the TV deal has to be an early target. Strip 6% from the prize money for first and second, then redistribute that equally to all twelve clubs.
Sadly it's too much to dream that there is a nuclear option of all ten clubs resigning from the SPL and making a mass application to rejoin the SFL should the Ugly Sisters try to resist the needed changes.
-
08-03-2012 06:59 PM #20
Hopefully a salary cap is on the agenda. It will help clubs adjust to any changes in income and stop Celtic running away with the league every year.
-
08-03-2012 07:01 PM #21
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dłn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 10,863
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 07:09 PM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 07:12 PM #23
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,443
Is an SPL2 likely when by a number of accounts we are progressing towards merging the SFL and SPL together? Plus the SFL clubs have already rejected SPL2 as a concept. Just because Rangers might quite like it as a get out clause for their situation changes little. Doesn't it need a majority of SFL clubs to back the idea? If so while the first division clubs might go for a season of Rangers gate money, wouldn't the second and third division clubs say no to force them down the leagues to get their own shot at an income boost?
As much as some figures within the game would like, or possibly even imagine, they can't just railroad this one through, there will be significant opposition to anything other than dropping them into SFL3, and rightly so.
Of course at this point it assumes Rangers even make it to the end of the season, if they are unable to fulfil fixtures isn't their SPL licence revoked, so there'd be nothing for a newco club to buy?
-
08-03-2012 07:15 PM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Id rather these things didnt get out because it gets the hopes of the fans up before anythings been discussed and inevitably leads to disappointment. I hope Im wrong however.
-
08-03-2012 07:25 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 07:33 PM #26This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 07:36 PM #27This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 07:38 PM #28
Would rather see a 16 team SPL with a top/bottom 8 split with 37 games a season
-
08-03-2012 07:38 PM #29This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2012 07:47 PM #30
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 2,480
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I agree with this idea, but I would split 8/6. The top 8 would then play home & away giving 40 games in total.
The bottom 6 also play home/away giving them 36 games. Bottom 2 automatically relegated and 3rd bottom in play off with 3rd place in lower division. Or bottom team relegated and 2nd bottom in play off, something along those lines.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks