11/1 voting system

[Ozyhibby]

Now is the time for the 10 non old firm clubs to act and get rid of the veto.
If rangers enter admin they lose their vote in the SPL.
Once the veto is gone anything is possible to make the game more attractive such as salary caps, league expansion or equal split of Tv money.
If clubs like Hibs don't act now then the chance will be gone and we'll be watching the same old crap for the next 30 years.

[Tha Cabbage Kid]

do they defo loose their vote?

[Part/Time Supporter]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Now is the time for the 10 non old firm clubs to act and get rid of the veto.
If rangers enter admin they lose their vote in the SPL.
Once the veto is gone anything is possible to make the game more attractive such as salary caps, league expansion or equal split of Tv money.
If clubs like Hibs don't act now then the chance will be gone and we'll be watching the same old crap for the next 30 years.

They don't. They only lose their share of the SPL if the existing Rangers company go out of business (in which case they would try to transfer it to a new company) or if they are relegated (aye right). The only leverage the other clubs would have is if the existing company goes out of business. They could then demand amendments to the SPL constitution in return for permitting the share transfer from the old Rangers to the new company.

[Jack]

From what I remember Hibs have quite often been the fly in the ointment where SPL voting is concerned.

Hibs are on the cusp where our income is mainly from the support while most other clubs rely mostly on the OF games, TV and other SPL income so will vote with the OF to protect that income.