Including goal line technology, a fourth substitute in extra time and not sending off a player if a penalty is given for denying a goal scoring opportunity in the box.
Interesting.
Results 1 to 30 of 33
-
01-02-2012 11:07 AM #1
New FIFA proposals at meeting in March
-
-
-
01-02-2012 11:27 AM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 11:49 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
should never happen but its the kind of thing they would allow and dismiss the things we really need like goal line tech.
-
01-02-2012 11:52 AM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 11:56 AM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 12:05 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 12:07 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 12:08 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 12:08 PM #11
The fouling/send off suggestion is ridiculous.
''It's always been just part of the culture. Growing up, for most working-class kids, is all about football, music or clothes. You might not have much money, but whatever you have got, you're going to look good.'' - Paul Weller
-
01-02-2012 12:10 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
where i have put expect i mean DEMAND he do
-
01-02-2012 12:12 PM #13This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 12:17 PM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 12:22 PM #15
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- In the west travelling east.
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 10,613
- Blog Entries
- 1
The double whammy they should be looking at is the one where a player gets fouled then has to go off the pitch until the referee decides to let him back on thereby weakening the team that has been fouled. Crazy IMO.
-
01-02-2012 12:51 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
4th sub in extra time - unsure, might be something behind it
last man penalty - ridiculous
-
01-02-2012 12:56 PM #17
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dùn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 10,863
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 01:02 PM #18
I always remember when mcgregor done deano outside the box late in a cup game, he got his red Alexander went in and we missed the free kick, that led to a replay which we lost I always felt that was worse than just a red as he won the tie as a result of a cynical action
Doing the 2013 Edinburgh half Marathon for McMillan it would be awesome if anyone fancies sponsoring me, http://www.justgiving.com/colin-smith1875 ,go on make a fat man run
-
01-02-2012 01:03 PM #19
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Dunfermline
- Age
- 50
- Posts
- 24,245
- Blog Entries
- 4
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Player receiving the card or making the foul should have to leave the park to get a detention slip from the 4th official.
-
01-02-2012 01:09 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Its tempting to think that the victim and culprit should go off for the same period of time.
However, if they did, you'd have players feigning injury for longer to jeep a big centre half from defending the free kick etc.
-
01-02-2012 01:13 PM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 01:18 PM #22
I can't imagine they're going to completely remove the 'last man' rule, really. I think it'll be left at the referee's own discretion, who will have to make the decision based on several factors - severity of the challenge, whether or not there was intent etc.
Any professional foul on the park earns a player a yellow card, so for the punishment to be exactly the same when the challenge is in the penalty box - and thwarting an almost certain goal - would be ludicrous.
-
01-02-2012 01:23 PM #23
Goal line technology is such a waste of time or money. There are ridiculously few incidents that require replays to decide whether a ball crossed the line. The problem is that these incidents usually become high profile so people think they happen more than they actually do. For example, when was the last time there was a contentious incident at Easter Road? I'm struggling to remember one. The cost of this technology does not justify how often it would have to be used.
All for the extra sub in extra time. If the game is a 1/3rd longer, the subs available should increase by this too.
I can't see how the last one would work, because goalscoring opportunities can be anywhere. E.g. if a player is fouled after going clear through 40 yards out, all you would get is a freekick Maybe if the penalty was missed a red card could be handed out in retrospect to balance it out? Even then its still a problem.
For me, the thing that would solve all of this is video technology like American Football and Tennis. A manager can appeal 2 or 3 decisions per match. The 5th official (video referee) reviews the incident using tv footage and overturns the decision on the pitch only if he is 100% sure the original call was wrong. Because challenges are limited, the hold up in play would not be as long as it is in Rugby for instance.
-
01-02-2012 01:25 PM #24
Also, should we not use some sort of Sin Bin system? For challenges or incidents that don't warrant a sending off but are definitely more than a booking?
-
01-02-2012 01:41 PM #25
I wouldn't relax the 'last-man' rule. I would make it tighter!
If a player is fouled outside the box but the referee deemed it a clear goal scoring opportunity the culprit is sent off but the attacking team only get a free kick. I think that because a clear goal scoring opportunity was denied then the attacking team should be awarded a penalty no matter where the offence was committed. Whether the player who committed the foul should be sent off would be up to the ref.
-
01-02-2012 01:47 PM #26
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 364
What about the defender being sent off if the penalty is missed and remains on (yellow card) if it scored? Therefore not a double whammy of losing a goal and a player? It's wrong not to be sent off if the attacking team misses the resulting penalty.
Hmmm.....this is taking it for granted that it was in the box.....not quite sure what would happen outside the box, better get the thinking cap on before I call Platini etc.
Also not sure what would happen if the "defender" is the goalkeeper, if the penalty is scored he stays on and if he saves it he gets sent off?
Jeez I've not really thought this through very well!!!!
Back to the drawing board.
-
01-02-2012 01:52 PM #27
An alternative would be to bring in a "penalty goal" concept (ala rugby), where if the referee thinks the defending team is deliberately fouling to avoid conceding a try they just give a penalty try. That would cover both inside and outside the box.
-
01-02-2012 01:54 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-02-2012 01:55 PM #29
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dùn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 10,863
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteLast edited by Saorsa; 01-02-2012 at 02:01 PM.
-
01-02-2012 01:59 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
a fourth substitute in extra time - nae need IMHO
not sending off a player if a penalty is given for denying a goal scoring opportunity in the box - if it is deliberate the defender should go. If the pen is missed the player should go. If scored the defender should stay on the park - nae need for the double whammy.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks