hibs.net Messageboard

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Suarez ban explained

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/mobile/football/16375325.stm
    Last edited by leither17; 31-12-2011 at 05:38 PM.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    First Team Regular Big Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    58
    Posts
    829
    Quote Originally Posted by A Regulator View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Liverpool and the Suarez advisors have made a right arse of this so far. With so little concrete evidence, if they had approached the allegations differently it would have been virtually impossible to find him guilty of anything!!
    Suarez admitted using the word “negro” and the basis of his argument was that the word, which means black in Spanish, was something that could be said without being racist or offensive.
    The FA Commission sought expert evidence from Uruguay, and found that the word is often used cordially but can be used offensively too, depending on the context.
    The experts stated that if it is used in the context of Evra’s allegation; that would be seen in Uruguay as racially offensive.
    Given that the incident occurred after a flashpoint between the two players; it is unlikely that the reference to the word was cordial.
    The report states that Suarez, although having used racist language, was not racist: a point that Evra is in agreement with. That is as good as it is going to get for Suarez and Liverpool and I think that if they accept the punishment, both player and club can move on from this. If not; it could get uglier.

  4. #3
    Coaching Staff Betty Boop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sunny Leith
    Posts
    9,076
    Lets cut to the chase here, He is a racist. How Liverpool or anybody else, can even attempt to defend him is shameful.I don't understand the report's conclusion that Suarez is not a racist either, seems at odds with the evidence.

  5. #4
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,081
    Was Evra's admitted threat to punch Saurez in the face not also worthy of some rebuke ?

  6. #5
    V-BUTTON CHAMPION 2008 H18sry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Church of Maradona T.A
    Posts
    9,637

  7. #6
    @hibs.net private member Scouse Hibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    22,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Betty Boop View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Lets cut to the chase here, He is a racist. How Liverpool or anybody else, can even attempt to defend him is shameful.I don't understand the report's conclusion that Suarez is not a racist either, seems at odds with the evidence.
    Yet Evra and the report state that he is not! What a ****in debacle it has turned into, I sincerely hope Liverpool's response to this report is handled better than their initial defence and the issue is finally put to bed until he does it again!

  8. #7
    @hibs.net private member Winston Ingram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    11,808
    Blog Entries
    1
    He's a racist. How anyone can behave like that and claim otherwise I've no idea.

    Liverpool's behaviour on this has been an utter disgrace.

  9. #8
    @hibs.net private member Hibs Class's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,203
    Quote Originally Posted by Winston Ingram View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He's a racist. How anyone can behave like that and claim otherwise I've no idea.

    Liverpool's behaviour on this has been an utter disgrace.
    Agree completely. 30 years ago Liverpool were a joy to watch on the pitch and a credit to themselves off it. It's hard to believe just how much that has changed, and a sad irony that Dalglish has been part of both those sides of the club.
    ​#PERSEVERED


  10. #9
    What I don't get with the Suarez case, and allegedly with John Terry as well, is that both these players have been involved (and allegedly involved in Terry's case) with using words that are against black people and yet they have so many team mates who are black.

    I also wonder if some of Suarez's team mates will be a little less keen to support him now that they know exactly what he has supposedly said to Evra. Glen Johnson, for example, was particularly vocal in his support for Suarez recently when he took to Twitter to show where his loyalties lie.

    It must make things very difficult and awkward now in the dressing rooms at Anfield and Stamford Bridge, with these two players present. Deep down, their team mates must have lost a bit of respect for them.

  11. #10
    @hibs.net private member Green_one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,536
    The report makes difficult reading for Liverpool on their overall stance and Suarez in particular. Calls him ' inconsistant' and one cross examination sequence shows him to be evassive and changing his story. Evra comes out a lot better. The video and expert evidence too seems to support Evra.

    We have Dalglish contradicting him and Kenny himself coming out with misinformation on Evra. Not good. I cannot see how guys like Johnson can feel entirely happy backing Suarez. Its about time Liverpool and Suarez did some damage limitation on this. Its already partly too late. Not appealing against the ban would be a good start.

    It does show the complexity of football dressing rooms, with Evra speaking to teammates in a mix of Spanish and Portuguese, then English on the same subject to the ref. Meantime Suarez is meantime speaking dutch to Kuyt.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)