hibs.net Messageboard

Results 1 to 28 of 28
  1. #1
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,086

    Rangers to consider Terracing

    Link


    OK, that's now both Rangers and Celtc interested.


    What I want to know is,

    A) Did Hibs lie to the fans when they said there was NO possibility of being allowed to have terracing in the newly built East Stand and they actually hadn't even asked?
    OR
    B) Is it the case that they told Hibs no and the authorities have rolled over to the OF now that they want it?


    Either way, something stinks.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    49
    Posts
    27,490
    Quote Originally Posted by keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Link


    OK, that's now both Rangers and Celtc interested.


    What I want to know is,

    A) Did Hibs lie to the fans when they said there was NO possibility of being allowed to have terracing in the newly built East Stand and they actually hadn't even asked?
    OR
    B) Is it the case that they told Hibs no and the authorities have rolled over to the OF now that they want it?


    Either way, something stinks.
    We built the stand some time ago now and this pilot was announced just last week.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Link


    OK, that's now both Rangers and Celtc interested.


    What I want to know is,

    A) Did Hibs lie to the fans when they said there was NO possibility of being allowed to have terracing in the newly built East Stand and they actually hadn't even asked?
    OR
    B) Is it the case that they told Hibs no and the authorities have rolled over to the OF now that they want it?


    Either way, something stinks.
    Nothing stinks

    With the state the old terrace area was in major repairs would have to have been carried out to get it upto a respectable standard, bearing in mind, Hibs had plans to build a new stand long before the terrace idea was even placed on the agenda at SFA or SPL HQ.

    Think your looking for something that aint there. Lets concentrate on supporting the club in getting 3 points tomorrow

  5. #4
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    We built the stand some time ago now and this pilot was announced just last week.
    Indeed which is why I also am struggling to understand the OP's post....

  6. #5
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    57
    Posts
    3,780
    Blog Entries
    1
    I think now would be an ideal time to fill in the corners! Four areas for standing space but controlled areas. All it would take would be extending the roof, back and some form of concrete type slope. Bet it would cost less than £2mil to do it all.

  7. #6
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    49
    Posts
    27,490
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think now would be an ideal time to fill in the corners! Four areas for standing space but controlled areas. All it would take would be extending the roof, back and some form of concrete type slope. Bet it would cost less than £2mil to do it all.
    For what gain?

    I think even converting a few of the current seats to safe standing wouldn't be worth the cost for us.

  8. #7
    Testimonial Due The_Exile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    East Lothian
    Posts
    2,909
    At the time the stand was built it was not possible and probably never envisaged to be even suggested, Hibs were right in what they said at the time.

  9. #8
    @hibs.net private member jacomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    exile
    Posts
    22,102
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Exile View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    At the time the stand was built it was not possible and probably never envisaged to be even suggested, Hibs were right in what they said at the time.
    Rubbish, I'm afraid. Bringing back standing areas in a safe and controlled manner was being widely discussed before Hibs committed to building the new East. I and many others mentioned it as part of the club's consultation exercise.

    If Hibs have included no provision for reverse engineering standing areas for the East, then this is a failure of management. And not the only one in recent times, unfortunately.

  10. #9
    Coaching Staff LancashireHibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Leigh, Lancashire
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,935
    Quote Originally Posted by jacomoseven View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Rubbish, I'm afraid. Bringing back standing areas in a safe and controlled manner was being widely discussed before Hibs committed to building the new East. I and many others mentioned it as part of the club's consultation exercise.

    If Hibs have included no provision for reverse engineering standing areas for the East, then this is a failure of management. And not the only one in recent times, unfortunately.
    It was mentioned, but nobody thought there was any likelihood of it coming to fruition, something backed up by the apparent surprise from Strathclyde polis after last week's decision. The East would possibly be an unsuitable area to experiment it because of the sheer scale of the East Stand, but the FF Lower could be a potential option.

  11. #10
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    57
    Posts
    3,780
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    For what gain?

    I think even converting a few of the current seats to safe standing wouldn't be worth the cost for us.
    Well fr starters: would finish of the stadium at a cheap price, four controlled standing areas - you gotta be hopeful of better days! Maybe stand 1500 per corner area?

    just a thought ...

  12. #11
    Why should the club have spent more money on building a stand to suit taking seats out of it for a then totally hypothetical reintroduction of standing?

    For what it's worth, I can't imagine it being too much more than removing a few rows of seats, but on the other hand, is there a vast number of folk who currently don't go to games who will only go back if they can stand? Because if there isn't this will simply lose us money.

  13. #12
    Remove the seats at the bottom of the FF. The cost? Obtain another long term loan from STF. (personal fortune £160,000,000 and counting ). Over time it will pay for itself. No cost to Hibernian or STF. Increased atmosphere in the ground.

    Happy days

  14. #13
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,942
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think now would be an ideal time to fill in the corners! Four areas for standing space but controlled areas. All it would take would be extending the roof, back and some form of concrete type slope. Bet it would cost less than £2mil to do it all.
    TBH, I would prefer the cheaper option of curtains on all of the stands.

  15. #14
    @hibs.net private member bod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,761
    Surely all you have to do is put some sort of barrier above each seat about waist height that you can lean on,so the person behind you cant fall onto you.
    Theres no need to remove any seats,youd just be standing instead of being seated

  16. #15
    'S' Form
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sutherland
    Age
    50
    Posts
    34
    I think it would be a great idea but it would be better doing it in the FF stand rather than the corners as then the increased atmosphere would be concentrated and not diluted by being split into 4 parts.

  17. #16
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,086
    Quote Originally Posted by DC_Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Indeed which is why I also am struggling to understand the OP's post....

    During the 'consultation exercise', we were told that any plans for terracing to be part of the build were NOT an option, because of SPL/SFA rules.

    Now, my point is that either they didn't really ask or it's suddenly only OK to consider changing the rules because the OF are now interested in terracing.


    My ideal rebuilt East Stand would have had two tiers with terracing in the lower tier, with around 4-5,000 standing places. We were told that wasn't an option so I'm wondering exactly what and how that situation has now changed.

  18. #17
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think now would be an ideal time to fill in the corners! Four areas for standing space but controlled areas. All it would take would be extending the roof, back and some form of concrete type slope. Bet it would cost less than £2mil to do it all.
    Just what Hibs need is to spend money to expand the stadium and make the stands even emptier!

    Don't delude yourself into thinking that such an operation would be inexpensive. Extending the roof will be very expensive

    The police have yet to be consulted and agree to standing. It is much the same with the local authority.

    Standing areas will certainly increase costs of policing and stewarding.

    Standing spectators will expect to pay reduced admission charges.

    So spend a lot of money to reduce income and make the ground appear emptier.

    I bet Hibs are consulting the Architects at this very moment.

  19. #18
    @hibs.net private member Bostonhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    lincolnshire
    Age
    64
    Posts
    24,141
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    For what gain?

    I think even converting a few of the current seats to safe standing wouldn't be worth the cost for us.
    Unless we had 4 multi millionaire fans willing to pay top dollar to stand on their own in each corner? We have a nice looking stadium but too big for our actual match day audience for a long while yet I fear. We need to stop spending on property and focus on the team now.

  20. #19
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    49
    Posts
    27,490
    Quote Originally Posted by keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    During the 'consultation exercise', we were told that any plans for terracing to be part of the build were NOT an option, because of SPL/SFA rules.

    Now, my point is that either they didn't really ask or it's suddenly only OK to consider changing the rules because the OF are now interested in terracing.


    My ideal rebuilt East Stand would have had two tiers with terracing in the lower tier, with around 4-5,000 standing places. We were told that wasn't an option so I'm wondering exactly what and how that situation has now changed.
    It's suddenly okay because the clubs have now voted to run a pilot. Not really that tricky.

    Standing ain't what it used to be in the safe standing areas. It would not being back all the attributes that made it interesting.

  21. #20
    I'm all for it. We need to do everything we can to bring fans back to the games. We could easily remove some seats and
    sell the same amount of tickets for standing. We could easily do it safely. Don't know of it would work but we need to try everything we can to bring fans back to ER.

  22. #21
    @hibs.net private member Viva_Palmeiras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    14,274
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think now would be an ideal time to fill in the corners! Four areas for standing space but controlled areas. All it would take would be extending the roof, back and some form of concrete type slope. Bet it would cost less than £2mil to do it all.
    Only need to extend 3 corners.
    The fourth will house the jumbo tv after the Olympics when the council will have no use for it.

  23. #22
    If Hibs pay to bring back standing, I'll piss down someone's back for free. The complete experience.

    HTH.

  24. #23
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,781
    Just cos the SPL have said it was ok does not its going to happen. Council officials and police won't be to keen on this. But would it surprise any one if the new community stadium had 3 terraces and 1 stand.

  25. #24
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Helmsley, York
    Age
    58
    Posts
    4,195
    Most of the issues around standing could be solved by the simple expediency - like they have at Swansea - of a mixed area - seasons and walk ups - that doesn't involve numbered seats. It means those who go every week stay with a mix of their mates - some of whom can't be there every time because of work, distance or sloth.

  26. #25
    Coaching Staff heretoday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    West Edinburgh
    Posts
    14,851
    Rangers can go and **** themselves.

  27. #26
    Coaching Staff monktonharp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    pleasant valley eh15
    Age
    70
    Posts
    11,356
    Quote Originally Posted by keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote


    My ideal rebuilt East Stand would have had two tiers with terracing in the lower tier, with around 4-5,000 standing places. We were told that wasn't an option so I'm wondering exactly what and how that situation has now changed.
    I could never understand how some mythical "fans respresentive meeting/forum with HFC board" agreed that the best,cheapest,quickest option was to build a single tier stand. It is far to steep, for a start, and was never going to create even half the atmoshere generated in the auld east, where the biggest majority stood , on the bloody seats, never mind just on their feet! a two tier,with the possible standing lower area, was the logical option. imho, but nowt can happen there now so the ff lower is the only possible. cannae see the frumpy buggers in the west lower agreeing to a trial , certainly the ones around me!

  28. #27
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by monktonharp View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I could never understand how some mythical "fans respresentive meeting/forum with HFC board" agreed that the best,cheapest,quickest option was to build a single tier stand. It is far to steep, for a start, and was never going to create even half the atmoshere generated in the auld east, where the biggest majority stood , on the bloody seats, never mind just on their feet! a two tier,with the possible standing lower area, was the logical option. imho, but nowt can happen there now so the ff lower is the only possible. cannae see the frumpy buggers in the west lower agreeing to a trial , certainly the ones around me!
    Spot on. A two-tier East might have been constructed bin such a way as to make a standing area possible. The design of the East makes it impossible to have standing anywhere without converting the lot.

    Any conversion of the FF lower would entail relocating a large number of season ticket holdersand causing real disruption.

    How many want to stand anyway? I suspect that most who do already stand.

    Probably the only grounds capable of introducing standing areas are Ibrox, Parkhead and Tynecastle. In all cases this would be the old paddock area in from of the main stand. These areas were designed for standing in the first place and could be converted albeit at a cost.

    In any event it is only been approved for a trial period. What happens if millions are spent in conversion and the stands have to be converted back if the trial does not go well?

    The cost would certainly rule out Ibrox and Tynecastle given the 'financial situation' of the clubs. Would Glasgow City Council and Strathclyde Police be happy to see Celtic go it alone on this one?

    The whole thing is a publicity stunt by the SPL to try and prove they are 'giving the fans what they ask for'. They will shrug their shoulders if the clubs fail to run with this one or it is torpedoed by the Police or Local Authorities.

  29. #28
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,856
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The design of the East makes it impossible to have standing anywhere without converting the lot.
    How so? I go to games in Germany every week and there are a variety of different standing areas on one tier and two tier stands:

    Could we not do this at one end of the east for example?
    http://stadiumdb.com/pictures/stadiu...ce_arena06.jpg

    or this:
    http://footballgrounds1.zoomshare.co...6590/thumb.jpg
    seats to the left, right and above on one tier at same level

    can even have top tier standing like in away end at hannover with seats below
    http://ultras-frankfurt.de/galerie/0...annover/08.jpg

    top tier seats and standing below like the famous five option are ten a penny and most likely for us perhaps?

    There are plenty options so it can happen....if Hibs are willing to shell out after completing the stadium based on the previous rules.

    I've no idea why folk are raising the filling in the corners pipedream once more. we were told before that the costs for filling corners are massive and we already have a 20k stadium we are nowhere near filling so why go to even more cost??

    People have asked if the East is too steep - not sure if it's any steeper than Dresden's away end which was built around 3 years ago
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pMH5tRjD7v...0/P1010714.JPG

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)