An Independent Regulatory Commission has today [Tuesday 20 December 2011] found a charge of misconduct against Luis Suarez proven, and have issued a suspension for a period of eight matches as well as fining him £40,000, pending appeal.
On 16 November 2011, The Football Association charged Luis Suarez with misconduct contrary to FA Rule E3 in relation to the Liverpool FC versus Manchester United FC fixture on 15 October 2011.
A hearing took place from 14-20 December 2011 before an Independent Regulatory Commission of The FA to consider the charge.
The Independent Regulatory Commission announced its decision on 20 December 2011, which is as follows:
The Independent Regulatory Commission will provide written reasons for its decision in due course setting out:
- Mr Suarez used insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3(1);
- the insulting words used by Mr Suarez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3(2);
- Mr Suarez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000;
- the [penalty] is suspended pending the outcome of any appeal lodged by Mr Suarez against this decision.
(a) the findings of fact made by it;
(b) the reasons for its decision finding the charge proved; and
© the reasons for the penalty.
Mr Suarez has the right to appeal the decision of the Independent Regulatory Commission to an Appeal Board. An appeal must be lodged within 14 days of the date of the written reasons for the decision.
The penalty is suspended until after the outcome of any appeal, or the time for appealing expires, or should Mr Suarez decide not to appeal. The reason for this is to ensure that the penalty does not take effect before any appeal so that Mr Suarez has an effective right of appeal.
Results 1 to 30 of 85
-
20-12-2011 07:08 PM #1
Suarez banned for 8 games (merged)
Less talk, more gifs. 21.05.16
-
-
-
20-12-2011 07:18 PM #4
I wonder if Liverpool will be sacking him. Any ordinary person found guilty of insulting someone on the basis of their race in the workplace would be dismissed.
Dalglish's comments so far on the whole case would suggest that won't be happening but it probably should.
-
20-12-2011 07:23 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It's gonna be very interesting to hear Dalglish's comments on this
He knows full well that racism wont be tolerated but he's already come out in support of his player
-
-
20-12-2011 08:04 PM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-12-2011 08:06 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote#PERSEVERED
-
20-12-2011 08:09 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-12-2011 08:18 PM #10
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 288
I love how they mention that Suarez is of "mixed heritage" as if that has any relevance at all. If you are Urugyuan (with European and Native American blood) it does not excuse racial abuse.
-
20-12-2011 08:21 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-12-2011 08:33 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But no, he happen's to be their most important player.
Disgraceful, shocking..
Liverpool, the people's club (aye right)
Should be ashamed of themselves...
Suarez = Racist
-
20-12-2011 08:38 PM #13This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Nah, No danger.
Maybe over their but not here I'm afraid
Suarez = Racist
-
20-12-2011 08:49 PM #14
Suarez is from mixed race grandparents, so I would find it hard to believe that he was a racist
-
20-12-2011 09:05 PM #15
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 288
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-12-2011 09:09 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Liverpool have played this very badly and continue to do so. Denial is not going to be good in the long run. Doubt the American owner is impressed.
I did think we were getting beyond all this.
-
20-12-2011 09:19 PM #17
Where is the actual physical evidence?
Nobody else heard it and no cameras picked anything up. If a bunch of suits simply took one mans word over another then liverpool are quite right to be livid.
-
20-12-2011 09:20 PM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
no place for racism but that is right the fa will have to clarify the decision
-
20-12-2011 09:25 PM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-12-2011 09:25 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-12-2011 09:53 PM #21
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Musselburgh
- Age
- 57
- Posts
- 4,837
As a Liverpool fan, I find this whole affair confusing. I do not condone what Suarez said and I would actually prefer it if he wasn`t at the club anymore as I dont want players who racially abuse others to be playing for my team.
Some will just see this as a good way of having a dig at Liverpool and it will take a long time for this stain on Saurez`s character to be removed.
the confusing part tho is what evidence what he actually convicted on. From what I have read, Suarez said he used a term commonly using in Uruguay but that`s no excuse and that was the basis of the verdict.
What has kinda been over-looked is that Evra also admitted to using a derogatory term in Spanish at Suarez but Suarez says he didnt hear it! Two wrongs don`t make a right but if Suarez can be found guilty because he owned up, will Evra be found similarly guilty?
-
20-12-2011 10:07 PM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
David de Gea (Spanish)
Javier Hernandez (Mexican)
Antonio Valencia (Ecuadorian)
-
20-12-2011 10:10 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
20-12-2011 10:11 PM #24
If Liverpool dont appeal and the 8 game ban starts now, I believe Suarez first game back would be at Old Trafford
-
20-12-2011 10:14 PM #25
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,781
KD claim the FA should not have appealed Rooneys ban as it sets a bad example. Well if he is true to his word he should not be appealing against the ban for this racists ****bag
-
-
20-12-2011 10:20 PM #27
He's got of lightly i think. Should have been punished the same as any other person. If i racially abused someone in the street saying what he apparantley said to Evra id be locked up.
-
21-12-2011 01:10 AM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
21-12-2011 01:38 AM #29
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- edinburgh
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 49
This article sums it up for me ! http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/mobile/...l/16262537.stm
-
21-12-2011 04:48 AM #30
I would not believe a word that evra says he has history of saying people are racisist and been found to be false
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks