We all know Levein has got a fair few Englishmen playing for us, which i have little problem with. It's not ideal but it is improving things.
Well it has come out now that he made an attempt to get Uruguays (Copa America player of the tournament!) Sebastien Coates, now on Liverpool. He had qualified through his grandfather but now it is too late, as in the summer he made his full debut. Levein has also now tried to get Jonjo Shelvey for Scotland, who has a Scottish father. Shelvey is on loan at Blackpool from Liverpool.
Coates for Scotland would have been strange! What is peoples opinions of us going global for players?
Results 1 to 30 of 31
Thread: Levein trying further afield!
-
15-11-2011 11:29 PM #1
Levein trying further afield!
-
15-11-2011 11:33 PM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
In fact Italy won a world cup with at least 4 uruguayans who had won the previous world cup. And IIRC an argentinian.
-
16-11-2011 12:04 AM #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Musselburgh
- Posts
- 611
Personally no problem with it if he qualifies through the current rules. In my opinion Levein is right to cast the net as everyone else has been doing. How many of France's World Cup winning team were born in Europe? Not all that many I'd wager. Unlikely that Coates was ever going to turn down World Cup semi-finalists and twice winners Uruguay to play for Scotland though!
-
16-11-2011 12:08 AM #4
France won a world cup with something like 9 players that were born out with France, I couldn't care less if they're from outer space as long as they win!
-
16-11-2011 03:09 AM #5
The sfa should be sending Mark Wotte over to Uruguay ASAP to see what they have bben doing the last 10 years with regard to youth development. They have a smaller population than Scotland yet are copa America champs and world cup semi finalists.
-
16-11-2011 04:09 AM #6
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- In the west travelling east.
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 10,613
- Blog Entries
- 1
If they are eligible through FIFA rules and of course they are good enough, play them, don't care which planet they come from.
-
16-11-2011 05:02 AM #7
Players should put thier National Team in thier documents at 21. They should be allowed to play for no other national side other than that one.
This playing for your second choice national team is killing the pride in International football, which was always it's greatest attraction, and therefor, why it is now dying a slow death.
-
16-11-2011 06:03 AM #8
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Gate 38
- Posts
- 7,816
Football has been apparently dying a death for years, which I think is a bit over dramatic.
I think Levein's global search for talent seems to be a far better one than Vogts' attempt. Looks like he's on to a winner with that Rhodes fella, for example. If they can pull on a jersey and do a job, then I don't care how they qualify to play for us.Last edited by steakbake; 16-11-2011 at 06:06 AM.
-
16-11-2011 08:16 AM #9
What about International Identity that I keep on hearing about, hence the NO to a Team GB Football team.
Surely a Scotland team that it's first 11 consists of half English born players is more damning to the Identity of the home nations.......................
-
16-11-2011 08:26 AM #10
We should be sending our best ex-footballers to countries with a a much better grass roots and teenage infrastructure for football to impregnate the women of that country and then promptly leave. We can then reap the benefits when these kids that have learned skills in the football schools of holland and the streets of Rio de Janeiro turn 18 and fly to Scotland to meet back up with there estranged father.
-
16-11-2011 08:36 AM #11
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- In the west travelling east.
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 10,613
- Blog Entries
- 1
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-11-2011 08:42 AM #12
I think Levein is a bit of a t!t and have some major issues with his past behaviour (Mowbray outburst, no forwards v Czech Republic, Fletcher issue), but I do think Scotland have improved a fair bit under him - one thing he always had as a club manager was an eye for a player, and if he can translate this to the National team then we can go places under him.
In fact, if he was to be a man and sort out the Fletcher situation, I would be rather optimistic about our chances of progression in our WC group. It's easily resolved, as Scotland manager it is Levein's job to pick the best players available to him, and he should pick Fletcher for the next squad for that reason - if Fletcher then turns round and says that he doesn't want to play, then that's the situation sorted once and for all; if Fletcher joins the group, we have a far stronger squad.
This nonsense that Fletcher needs to be the one to contact him to say that he is available for selection is exactly that - nonsense. Would Ryan Stevenson have phoned him to say that he was available and wanted to be picked? Anyone else in the squad? Of course not. He went cap in hand to McGregor, Ferguson and Boyd, despite their behaviour being miles away from what Fletcher has done, and it's this inconsistency that bugs me more than anything.
Grow up, show the necessary maturity, and give us the best chance we possibly have of going to Brazil - it's your job after all.
-
16-11-2011 08:59 AM #13
Much as I dislike HP as a manager ( I know nothing about Levein the man !!) I say good luck to him on this .
All he is doing , surely, is " playing to the rules" !
FIFA/UEFA set up and pass the regulations therefore let's use them to our advantage .
-
16-11-2011 09:17 AM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There are about 500,000 Scots living in England at any one time. Multiply up by the number of children and grandchildren they have (or will have). If you look at it that way, it is almost a statistical certainty that you will have Anglo-Scots in the Scotland team.
-
16-11-2011 09:30 AM #15
You can say that again
Imagine Ronaldinho had actually joined St Mirren, we might have had a team of of them in a few years if he'd put it about a bit in Paisley, those Paisley birds, phwoaaaar. Brazilliant.Last edited by The_Exile; 16-11-2011 at 09:33 AM.
-
-
-
16-11-2011 11:50 AM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I must be watching some other team then
-
16-11-2011 12:10 PM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
16-11-2011 12:38 PM #21
How many English players do we want in the national team? He tried to get Jonjo Shelvey http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottis...h-to-scotland/ the picture in this article say's it all, CL is degrading the nation by trawling the lower reaches of English football, for anybody who has tasted shortbread on Hogmanay and asking if they would like to enhance there CV by getting capped. We are looking at players whose 1st choice is not Scotland.
Rhodes is different he feels Scottish having been brought up here from a very young age so I can see where he is coming from, but Morrison,Gilks,CMS,Commans and Bardsley who only play for us because England never came calling is bollocks to me.
-
16-11-2011 02:36 PM #22
I hate to see non Scots playing for us. However, if they all show the passion that Rhodes shows then I have no issue. If the player has that passion, and feels proud to wear the dark blue and this is shown through his commitment during matches then he is Scottish enough for me. (obviously with the necessary background)
-
16-11-2011 02:39 PM #23
If we achieved the same levels of success that Jack Charlton's Republic of Ireland team managed by adopting a similar plan, I couldn't give a toot.
-
16-11-2011 03:24 PM #24
Playing players that aren't from Scotland - partly why I couldn't give a rats arse about national football.
-
16-11-2011 04:19 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-11-2011 04:32 PM #26
I think that it should just be the country of your birth. Its just becoming a bit too much like club football now for my tastes, with the heavyweights being able to poach players. Much of Germany's recent success, for example, can be attributed to two Poles; Podolski and Klose. Its such a shame, using that example, that Poland have missed out on such a talented strikeforce just because they are a bit crap in comparison. Who is to say how different their successes could have been if they had those two to call upon (Klose is one goal off being the highest goalscorer in World Cup history!)
We have lost out on McCarthy and McGeady purely because they knew they have a better chance of playing at a World Cup/the Euros. It has (im almost certain) nothing to do with the reasons they gave. As it has turned out, if we had those two in our squad, I dont think we would be too far off Ireland tbh. Can't do anything about that now!
This then leaves the "wee teams" like us to pick up whatever is left and get second rate footballers who have no proper connection to our country, purely because they want to play international football and they are slightly better than any Scots in those positions.
I hate seeing half the team silent during the national anthem.
Rant over.
-
16-11-2011 04:42 PM #27This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You can be Scottish and not be born in Scotland. You should see how I react when people call me "english".
-
16-11-2011 04:47 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I never have had any problem with players moving south to play in England and being picked for Scotland - we'd have been hard-pressed in the past if we'd refused to play guys like Dave Mackay, Denis Law, Billy Bremner or Archie Gemmill. They were real 'Anglo-Scots' - Scots who played in England.
The old rules could be pretty stupid, too - our Joe Baker was an English international, even though his father and mother were both Scots and he was 6 weeks old when they brought him back to Scotland from Liverpool where he was born. His brother Gerry (ours too) was qualified to play for the USA, but not Scotland. Their dad was in the Army, I think. Puskas played for both Hungary and Spain; Di Stefano was born in Argentina, but played for Argentina, Colombia and Spain at different times; Italy selected players from South America for the 1934 WC - Guarisi was Brazilian, DeMaria, Monti and Orsi were all Argentinian. I think all four played for their 'home' countries as well as for the Azzuri. And look at France's squads over the past while - how many were born in former French African colonies? France was stroing at the expense of the African nations whose players they poached.
I personally feel that the present rules are too lax - qualification through grandparents makes for a very tenuous link between the players and the country they represent. But that's international football these days.
But you don't have to like it. I don't.
-
16-11-2011 04:56 PM #29This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Its not about finding players who are passionate about the shirt necessarily, its more about giving countries a chance to benefit from their best players and to give fans a chance to see their team in a major tournament once in a while.
-
16-11-2011 05:59 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Scotland wouldn't be a country if it wasn't for the people who fought and died in it's battles, and it's not like English or French soldiers were turned away if they were prepared to pledge their allegiance - after all, there were a goodly number of Scots wearing English shirts on these occasions!. So, it doesn't seem to me that being born in Scotland is particularly relevant.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks