hibs.net Messageboard

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 44
  1. #1
    @hibs.net private member Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dont know its too dark in here
    Age
    66
    Posts
    12,208

    11% of Scots think sectarianism is not offensive and is OK at football!

    That’s 572,000 bigots in Scotland – or just about the population of the whole of Glasgow.

    15% don’t think it should be a criminal offence!! That’s 780,000 bigot sympathisers.

    9% don’t think any stronger action should be taken to tackle sectarianism!!! That’s 468,000 ignorant bigots.

    Taken from a Scottish Government media release today ...

    An overwhelming majority of Scots support stronger action being taken to tackle sectarianism and offensive behaviour associated with football according to a new poll published today.

    The survey, carried out by TNS-BMRB, reveals that 91 per cent of Scots back stronger action, with 89 per cent agreeing that sectarianism is offensive and unacceptable in Scottish football.

    The results come as the Scottish Parliament begins its consideration of proposals by Ministers to strengthen existing laws through tough new legislation to crack down on offensive and threatening behaviour in Scottish football.

    The full results show:
    • 89 per cent of Scots agree that sectarianism is offensive
    • 89 per cent of Scots agree that sectarianism is unacceptable in Scottish football
    • 85 per cent of Scots agree that sectarianism should be a criminal offence
    • 91 per cent agree that stronger action needs to be taken to tackle sectarianism and offensive behaviour associated with football in Scotland
    http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/wg-news-...D?OpenDocument

    While the Scottish Government have obviously gone for the big numbers, the small figures, covering the small minded, are not small enough not to be an utter and complete embarrassment to the Scottish Nation.
    Space to let


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Age
    55
    Posts
    2,206
    Then I would argue that 11% of Scots are neanderthals with draconian attitudes. GGTTH.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That’s 572,000 bigots in Scotland – or just about the population of the whole of Glasgow.

    15% don’t think it should be a criminal offence!! That’s 780,000 bigot sympathisers.

    9% don’t think any stronger action should be taken to tackle sectarianism!!! That’s 468,000 ignorant bigots.

    Taken from a Scottish Government media release today ...



    http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/wg-news-...D?OpenDocument

    While the Scottish Government have obviously gone for the big numbers, the small figures, covering the small minded, are not small enough not to be an utter and complete embarrassment to the Scottish Nation.
    Think you got your answer

  5. #4
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,077
    I'm not offended by sectarianism at football matches. I grew immune to it during my seasons on the terracings home and away in the 60's and 70's and still laugh when I here the grunts perform their pathetic ditties.

    But is it O K. No its time for all sides to cut it out and crank out football chants and they can be as un-P.C. as they like with an exception of outright racist chants.

  6. #5
    @hibs.net private member Sylar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Lanark/Palo Alto
    Age
    38
    Posts
    17,517
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: sjmcg1304
    It's a sub-sample of the Scottish population, so let's try and avoid sweeping generalisations by trying to put it into numbers.
    Madness, as you know, is a lot like gravity. All it takes is a little push.

  7. #6
    I've got mixed feelings about this to be honest.

    I think that this has been blown up, big time, because of the Lennon v McCoist handbags last season and all of the nonsense involving Neil Lennon. What he had to put up with last season was disgraceful and out of order and the attack on him was shocking.

    However, I can't help but think that this legislation is going too far in trying to tackle this problem and won't actually get to the bottom of the real issues.

    Five years in prison for shouting an offensive word at a football game! Are you kidding me?

    That's more than 60% of the time that Abdelbaset al-Megrahi spent in prison for murdering 270 people!

    And then, a couple of months ago, we had a member of the executive saying that she couldn't rule out football fans being prosecuted for singing the national anthem as a result of this new legislation! I've never heard anything so absurd in my life.

    Last week at Tynecastle, I could barely see a lot of the game in the first half because of all the extra police officers that were going about in the Hibs end. I thought at first that they must have had intelligence about a possible threat to the game. However, I soon realised that these extra officers were part of the "anti-sectarian initiative".

    For a start, this has not been an issue within our support for many years and also if there had been the odd person who had said something out of order, I'm sure that the previous number of police officers who were on duty at Edinburgh derbies would have been more than capable of dealing with the incident.

    When all is said and done, I am willing to bet that the Celtic fans are still singing songs in support of the IRA, and being allowed to do so, and Rangers fans are still singing their Loyalist songs as well, and being allowed to do so.

    As far as I'm concerned, the physical assaults, violence and the death threats are the main issues at hand here and that is what the police and the authorities should be treating as the main priority. Once that is done, they can then move on to sorting out the songs and the chants.

  8. #7
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    193
    What i cant understand is people who take any notice of a goverment poll! whats worse is when you get one who spins it to 570,000 of the popultation,they are only words,you know like backboard,gollywog,blackman ice cream ect..Its just another form of control from your squeaky clean govertments past and pressent.

  9. #8
    A proper definition of the word 'sectarianism' would probably help. If by 'sectarianism' they mean God Save the Queen and the Soldiers Song, Union flags and Irish tri-colours, Rule Britannia and Boys of the old Brigade then no, there shouldn't be any punishments etc. In my opinion anyone that takes offence at a flag/song is a bigger dafty than those taking part in such 'activities'.

  10. #9
    Coaching Staff --------'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    25,320
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: Eh? PSN ID: No comprendo, senor. Wii Code: What's a Wii?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That’s 572,000 bigots in Scotland – or just about the population of the whole of Glasgow.

    15% don’t think it should be a criminal offence!! That’s 780,000 bigot sympathisers.

    9% don’t think any stronger action should be taken to tackle sectarianism!!! That’s 468,000 ignorant bigots.

    Taken from a Scottish Government media release today ...

    http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/wg-news-...D?OpenDocument

    While the Scottish Government have obviously gone for the big numbers, the small figures, covering the small minded, are not small enough not to be an utter and complete embarrassment to the Scottish Nation.

    Knickers-in-a-twist time come early this week?

    First of all, just because someone thinks "sectarianism" - however exactly it may be defined in the context of the present argument - shouldn't be a specific criminal offence distinct from other criminal offences doesn't make them "bigot sympathisers".

    Nor does being of the opinion that if the police were to actually apply existing laws relating to breach of the peace and threatening behaviour properly we wouldn't need new legislation to deal with the problem make one an "ignorant bigot".

    The problem with a term like "sectarianism" is that it can be defined and redefined very easily to suit one's own prejudices. Which makes it a very useful tool for anyone who fancies himself/herself as a potential Thought Polis.

    No matter how intolerant my views may be, I probably won't consider anyone who agrees with me to be a "bigot" - simply a decent upstanding right-thinking chap who just happens to hate all the same people as I do.

    Of course, I can also take the position that I'm not in ANY way bigoted or prejudiced, which lets me build up a lovely glow of self-satisfaction and self-righteousness - thanking whatever deity I worship (myself, perhaps?) that I'm not as nasty as the bad bigoted Rangers, Celtic, Hearts, Airdrie - whatever - supporters.

    Generalising like mad about them as I do so, and sounding awfully like a good old-fashioned Pharisee.

    So IMHO "sectarianism" shouldn't be the offence as such. Threatening behaviour, breach of the peace, illegal assembly, whatever - there are lots of offences already on the statute book which should enable conscientious police officers to deal with offensive behaviour inside or outside football grounds. We don't need new laws, just the police to enforce existing ones.

    And no, this doesn't "utterly and completely embarrass" me in regard to the Scottish nation. True, we do have our share of bampots and hooligans, but Scotland isn't that bad a place to live.

    Except when we get the horizontal rain and perishing cold wind like we have today...

  11. #10
    No One asked me! I think I must live in a far away land, i only heard on the radio yesterday that fans of hibs/hearts were involved with governmental discussions on this issue.

  12. #11
    @hibs.net private member RIP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    7,726
    Apparently the sampling was all done by interviewing 200 people in Dalry Ayrshire.

    Of the other questions asked we can now assume that 856,769 people in Scotland have married their cousin, 456,997 have had a child out of wedlock, 632,098 wear a Burberry Cap and 1,065,433 pick their noses whilst watching Gary - Tank Commander
    Last edited by RIP; 06-09-2011 at 04:50 PM.

  13. #12
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,077
    Defining a Bigot might be helpful too !

    My Chambers Dictionary says a Bigot is " somebody who is blindly and obstinately devoted to a particular creed or PARTY"

    There must be dozens of Labour Party Bigots and SNP bigots out there .

    Get them lifted pronto.

  14. #13
    While agreeing with the general theme that 'bigots' have no place in a modern forward thinking society, are the practicalities of enforcing this not quite difficult. Especially if we cant agree what is bigoted chanting/behaviour.

    Could this be yet another knee jerk reaction to a moral panic, hoping to mend a broken arm with a sticking plaster.. Most people(apart from the great unwashed i seems) in Scotland know exactly what and where the problems with sectarianism lie. And one of the major factors in preventing a real solution to the problem is that most of the rule makers in scotland are bigoted followers of the old firm.


    Interestingly , throughout the debates on the above subject, there seems to have been little or no mention of bigoted behavbiour on other parts of our society. Could attempts at introducing Sharia law ( http://loganswarning.com/2011/07/10/...force-the-law/ ) in some parts of the UK not to be considered equally bigoted due to the lack of respect for the beliefs of others? I have heard very little about this on the news, why has this not been given more publicity? Beacause as i see it, you cannot condemn one type of intolerance while condoning another. would be surprised to see every man and his dog so quick to condemn this behaviour through fear of being branded racist etc.

  15. #14
    Coaching Staff heretoday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    West Edinburgh
    Posts
    14,851
    What worries me about the prospect of Independence is not the economics or the oil or whatever but that lot in the west.

    I reckon they would become far more vocal, form themselves into political parties and probably get elected to Parliament.

    I'm voting No.

  16. #15
    Testimonial Due smurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cameron Toll
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,380
    Quote Originally Posted by heretoday View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What worries me about the prospect of Independence is not the economics or the oil or whatever but that lot in the west.

    I reckon they would become far more vocal, form themselves into political parties and probably get elected to Parliament.

    I'm voting No.
    Indeed. I'm surprised its only 11% to be honest..

  17. #16
    Day Tripper matty_f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    46
    Posts
    49,080
    Blog Entries
    1
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: franck sauzee
    Sectarianism isn't a football problem, IMHO - it's a social one. That it manifests itself at some clubs - Hearts, Rangers, and Celtc makes it easy for the Government to link them together. Football isn't bigoted, though some of it's fans are. These fans are also cinema goers, shoppers, workers.

    The Government should not be looking to football to cure this ill, it's mis-directed action that will continue to fail to address the deeper issues. They will never succeed in stopping the Hearts, Rangers, and Celtc fans from singing their songs until they sort out the social issues around the bigotry.
    Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
    https://longbangers.hubwave.net

  18. #17
    Left by mutual consent! Peevemor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Saint-Malo, Brittany
    Age
    56
    Posts
    28,678
    Quote Originally Posted by smurf View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Indeed. I'm surprised its only 11% to be honest..
    Ditto.

  19. #18
    criminalising an opinion, point of view or belief is dodgy ground as far as I'm concerned as who determines who's beliefs are right or wrong.

    We live in a multicultural society and there are always going to be those who are less tolerant of those that they perceive to be different to themsleves.

    I agree with another poster that said that when these thoughts turn to violence it becomes a criminal act and those that carry out these criminal acts should quite rightly be punished for it and as severely as the courts will allow, I'm not sure if the motives matter or not.

    I don't know if I would want to live in a country where laws determine what I can and cannot say or think.

    This is a very heavy topic for a football message board..... the Hearts, don't call the thought police on me.....
    Last edited by HNA6; 07-09-2011 at 11:54 AM. Reason: Please dont bypass the swear filter

  20. #19
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,519
    I find it offensive that the government is wasting money on such polls

  21. #20
    First Team Regular lobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    The West
    Posts
    643
    6 out of 7 dwarves are not happy

  22. #21
    Coaching Staff hibsbollah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    53
    Posts
    33,926
    Id be interested in the findings of a poll that looked at the proportion of respondents that have any understanding of what sectarianism and bigotry actually IS. I bet there would be no commonly agreed definition except it is a 'bad thing'.

  23. #22
    First Team Breakthrough
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    358
    wonder what percentage of scottish fans were singing flower of scotland last night? 90%+ probs.

    we really are a bigoted country.

    p.s. im one of the 11% who dont find it offensive

  24. #23
    One of the things that has been forgotten is that this lurched into life on the back of an OF match where in fact all the abusive behaviour took place on the field or between the managements-not the spectators.

  25. #24
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,084
    87% of statistics are just made up.






  26. #25
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,084
    Quote Originally Posted by libernian View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    wonder what percentage of scottish fans were singing flower of scotland last night? 90%+ probs.

    we really are a bigoted country.

    p.s. im one of the 11% who dont find it offensive

    Deary me, not this again.


    Please tell us which part of Flower of Scotland is offensive, why and to whom.


    If you actually attempt to answer this, you'll be the first.

  27. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by libernian View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    wonder what percentage of scottish fans were singing flower of scotland last night? 90%+ probs.

    we really are a bigoted country.

    p.s. im one of the 11% who dont find it offensive
    Dearie me

  28. #27
    First Team Breakthrough
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Deary me, not this again.


    Please tell us which part of Flower of Scotland is offensive, why and to whom.


    If you actually attempt to answer this, you'll be the first.
    sorry, was trying to be sartcastic when i said "we really are a bigoted country". i dont find flower of scotland offensive at all.

    cant really be bothered getting into an discussion about particular words used in a song in any case. but i dont really see the difference between gloating about winning at bannockburn (if thats what flower of sco is about) and orange marches or whatever...

  29. #28
    Testimonial Due Hainan Hibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Breda
    Posts
    4,771
    Quote Originally Posted by heretoday View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What worries me about the prospect of Independence is not the economics or the oil or whatever but that lot in the west.

    I reckon they would become far more vocal, form themselves into political parties and probably get elected to Parliament.

    I'm voting No.
    What's stopping them from doing that now? More sensational ***** from Unionists.

  30. #29
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,084
    Quote Originally Posted by libernian View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    sorry, was trying to be sartcastic when i said "we really are a bigoted country". i dont find flower of scotland offensive at all.

    cant really be bothered getting into an discussion about particular words used in a song in any case. but i dont really see the difference between gloating about winning at bannockburn (if thats what flower of sco is about) and orange marches or whatever...

    Fair enough, you were being sarcastic but there's a lot of people make this claim and no one has ever been able to answer the question I raised.

    The first people I heard saying this were OF followers trying to justify their singing of bigoted or terrorist-loving songs. None of them could answer my question either. It doesn't stop this being repeated ad nauseam as if it were an accepted fact FoS is offensive.

  31. #30
    First Team Breakthrough DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Fenchurch East CID
    Posts
    273
    I tend to take any political pish with a very substantial bucketful of salt, and never trust anything along the lines of "78% of twats think pish about a load of bollocks" but there again I feel two ways about this.

    Part of me thinks that this is an embarrassing problem that needs to be routed from society good and proper. I cringe hearing it at the 'Tic, Gerz and Fertz games and I cringed when I recently met up with colleagues up in the Orkney Isles of all places who tell stories of nutters coming out with the sort of crap heard at these games, all from a place where all this has NEVER been heard of previously. What brought it in? Twats supporting Ra Gerz and Sellick who having been to the games and being infected with the poison brought it back home with them. Saddening.

    There again another part of me also thinks that this is political pish being exaggerated for political reasons. Jailing some inbred doofus for 5 years for singing songs at a football game is bizarre IMO. Jailing folk for going out fighting, encouraging violence etc. for bigoted reasons is definately good, but singing songs? Hmm. One thinks if this really is serious then most of Parkhead and Ibrox and all in the infamous Section N at PBS will need to be arrested at their clubs' respective next home games. Circa 100000 arrests in one weekend hmm? Has this really been thought thru? Gene Genie suspects not.

    Of course, you don't have to look far to see the problem, which isn't anything to do with society, or politics, or the economy, or any other political pish musing. The main problem is namely two certain football clubs in Glasgow.

    Gene Genie

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)