Numpty who attacked Neil Lennon has been CLEARED of assault. WTF!
Results 1 to 30 of 74
Thread: Lennon assailant cleared.
-
31-08-2011 04:12 PM #1
Lennon assailant cleared.
-
-
-
31-08-2011 04:24 PM #4
Not proven verdict on the religious hatred charge but hopefully he'll still get done on the assault charge.
-
31-08-2011 04:26 PM #5
It's all part of the big, fat, Anti-Sellick conspiracy
''It's always been just part of the culture. Growing up, for most working-class kids, is all about football, music or clothes. You might not have much money, but whatever you have got, you're going to look good.'' - Paul Weller
-
31-08-2011 04:45 PM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 04:47 PM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 04:52 PM #8
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 77
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 04:56 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
31-08-2011 05:08 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 05:18 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 05:21 PM #13
The poor wee Jambo has suffered enough IMO. Imagine having Lennon and his big yellow teeth breathing right on ye.
-
31-08-2011 05:26 PM #14
The charge was religiously aggravated assault - or something similar - and the prosecution couldn't prove that the "attack" was fuelled by bigotry.
However, he shouldn't have went for him - no matter how much he dislikes the guy - and deserves to be punished for it.
Pretty stupid to charge him on religious grounds IMO.
-
31-08-2011 05:38 PM #15
Why has STV censored his face out in this video? Everyone else is running his picture today.
http://news.stv.tv/scotland/268432-h...n-neil-lennon/
-
31-08-2011 05:40 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 07:04 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The question might be "why did other media show his face, when he was only convicted of a breach of the peace?"Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 31-08-2011 at 07:08 PM.
-
31-08-2011 07:07 PM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 07:18 PM #19
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 3,588
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Assaulting Neil Lennon isn't a "religiously aggravated" crime in itself. I'd have hoped that the PF and the police would have thought they had sufficient evidence for this charge, rather than thinking "we'll get him no bother on whatever we want, because it was on the telly".
Whatever the PF and the police thought they could nail him for, the jury thought differently.
You'd also have to hope the jury were entirely neutral on the issue of Neil Lennon, the man. But that's probably unlikely in Scotland, because most people who have heard of him, can't stand him. And that's not a religiously aggravated opinion.
The guy obviously deserved to get hammered for this - but it's not his fault the charges were over-done.
-
31-08-2011 07:46 PM #20
Somebody thought he'd make a name for himself getting a high profile case proven on the religious aspect rather than getting him on what was obvious to anyone watching the telly.
-
31-08-2011 07:52 PM #21
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
However its upset both Celtic and Hearts so every cloud and all that.
-
31-08-2011 07:56 PM #22
Celtic have put a statement abut the verdict on their website:
CELTIC Football Club have released the following statement regarding the verdict at today's court case in Edinburgh.
"It is for the Jury to decide on this case, however, we find the accused's acquittal of the charge of assault difficult to comprehend bearing in mind our knowledge of the incident.
"One thing is clear - this was a disgraceful incident involving Neil Lennon, seen by the world - the sort of incident which should not have happened in any football stadium and one which embarrassed Scottish football.
"Regardless of the verdict reached, we hope that people will learn from the events of last season and realise these cannot be repeated.
“As always we will give Neil Lennon our full support and hope that this season he can be given the opportunity to be allowed to do his job without the kind of threats, attacks and intimidation which have marred much of his time in Scotland."#PERSEVERED
-
31-08-2011 07:59 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
And....given their "knowledge of the incident".... shouldn't they have made this "knowledge" available to the Court?
-
31-08-2011 07:59 PM #24
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 3,312
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 08:02 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 08:02 PM #26This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote#PERSEVERED
-
31-08-2011 08:02 PM #27
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2011 08:04 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Not proven is effectively "we think you did it, but we don't have the proof".
So, no, he wasn't acquitted, on either charge.
-
31-08-2011 08:11 PM #29This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN02710.pdf#PERSEVERED
-
31-08-2011 08:50 PM #30
I always thought a Not proven verdict in Scotland mean't he could be re-tried for the same offence at a later date?
I think his defence was that he said "fu**ing wa**er" and not Fenian Bas***d. Only one Yam steward said he heard the fenian phrase.
He's still to be sentenced on the Breach charge, which could be quite severe I'd imagine given the circumstances.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks