Hibs v Killie - BBC Highlights

***hibees59*** · 13-02-2011 05:25 PM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/9396433.stm

**Prof. Shaggy** · 13-02-2011 05:36 PM

One of the more blatant examples of simulation...

**Gatecrasher** · 13-02-2011 05:41 PM

im not sure killies one was a penalty, dickoh seemed to get the ball quite clearly

how did the ref get 5 bookings from that

Mixu made the situation worse than it should have been

**hibsboy90** · 13-02-2011 05:57 PM

Originally Posted by Prof. ****gy

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

One of the more blatant examples of simulation...

I think that the Killie defender's arm smacks deek in the face.

***Arch Stanton*** · 13-02-2011 05:59 PM

Originally Posted by Gatecrasher

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

im not sure killies one was a penalty, dickoh seemed to get the ball quite clearly

how did the ref get 5 bookings from that

Mixu made the situation worse than it should have been

Not only did he win the ball cleanly but he wouldn't have seen the Killie player who was coming in behind him. And even if the Killie player was caught on the follow through there is no way he could have scored a goal without crippling Dickoh!!

**hibbytam** · 13-02-2011 06:01 PM

second killie chance.... How on earth wasn't he given offside? The guy's practically off the pitch when the ball's played. Comically awful decision.

**Broken Gnome** · 13-02-2011 06:05 PM

Originally Posted by hibbytam

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

second killie chance.... How on earth wasn't he given offside? The guy's practically off the pitch when the ball's played. Comically awful decision.

Booth played it back rather than the Killie player playing it forward.

The highlights lean towards our view of the incidents. Looked less in the Sodje/Pascali incident that it seemed at the time; you'd get a free kick for Sissoko's arm in Riordan's anywhere else, so no matter how soft a penalty it might seem there's justifcation for it; it wasn't a Killie penalty, and Scott played the ball before Clancy was anywhere near making it a 50/50 so it's not exactly one of these excessive force/dangerously play cases. Still think Killie might've had a case for handball in the box in injury time though....

***Hibs Class*** · 13-02-2011 06:18 PM

Kilmarnock pen and Dickoh red card both clearly wrong. Fortunately didn't affect the result but Hibs should appeal the sending off.

***Aldo*** · 13-02-2011 06:27 PM

Never a foul for Sodje's goal, the killie boy fell over his own legs.

As for the penalties, Deek ripped the Killie boy a new one and stuck his right arm out...verdict penalty.

As for Dicoh...If it was at the other end would we want a penalty..answer Yes. both were penalties IMHO.

As for Mixu he can GTF. Scott won the ball fair and square and the killie no 2 jumped right into him. Mixu caused the bother cos his laddies pussied out of the challenge endof.

Removed · 13-02-2011 06:29 PM

Originally Posted by 2468

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Kilmarnock pen and Dickoh red card both clearly wrong. Fortunately didn't affect the result but Hibs should appeal the sending off.

**~~Hibernia Na Eir~~** · 13-02-2011 06:31 PM

Mixu almost caused a riot. What a fool.

**sixtwo** · 13-02-2011 06:47 PM

Mixu is a buffoon. He has had his purple patch. He will now start to struggle and as the pressure mounts these outbursts and tantrums at the sidelines will become more frequent. He is like a petulant child.

***Arch Stanton*** · 13-02-2011 06:47 PM

Originally Posted by Aldo

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never a foul for Sodje's goal, the killie boy fell over his own legs.

As for the penalties, Deek ripped the Killie boy a new one and stuck his right arm out...verdict penalty.

As for Dicoh...If it was at the other end would we want a penalty..answer Yes. both were penalties IMHO.

As for Mixu he can GTF. Scott won the ball fair and square and the killie no 2 jumped right into him. Mixu caused the bother cos his laddies pussied out of the challenge endof.

Sorry, but absolutely not. (Well OK, maybe yes but only on the principle you always appeal for everything!)

The Killie player was always going to be second to the ball - and since he never got near the ball through the whole incident any late tackle was HIS and NOT Dickohs.

**sahib** · 13-02-2011 06:48 PM

Originally Posted by Aldo

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never a foul for Sodje's goal, the killie boy fell over his own legs.

As for the penalties, Deek ripped the Killie boy a new one and stuck his right arm out...verdict penalty.

As for Dicoh...If it was at the other end would we want a penalty..answer Yes. both were penalties IMHO.

As for Mixu he can GTF. Scott won the ball fair and square and the killie no 2 jumped right into him. Mixu caused the bother cos his laddies pussied out of the challenge endof.

I don't agree about Dickoh ( as for us wanting it if it was at the other end -that is an irrelevance since fans want any thing that remotely looks like a penalty). Imagine you are looking at that situation through Dickoh's eyes, do you see a Killie player in front of you needing tackled? No you see a ball rolling across your box needing cleared . It was always Dickoh's ball.

**PeterboroHibee** · 13-02-2011 06:50 PM

Sodje barely touched the defender and he went over quite easily imo. Riordans was a bit soft but most strikers will go down in the box with contact like that.

As for the Killie incidents, really dont think think it was a penalty, Dickoh won the ball. Scotts challenge was a bit forceful but he won the ball, the boy he tackled wasnt bothered so dunno what Mixu was playing at.

Think a few of the first Killie chances are worrying though, glad we won the game but if that Agard they have had a bit of composure we could have been a couple down early on. Dont like how Dickoh slid in like that in the box, needs to stay on his feet, huge risk that he either gives away a penalty or gets skinned by the striker (as he did).

***I'm_cabbaged*** · 13-02-2011 06:55 PM

Originally Posted by Hibernia Na Eir

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Mixu almost caused a riot. What a fool.

Then quietly slipped onto the dugout, he did the same at Ibrox when Smith followed him into our dugout.

**ekhibee** · 13-02-2011 06:56 PM

Originally Posted by Aldo

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never a foul for Sodje's goal, the killie boy fell over his own legs.

As for the penalties, Deek ripped the Killie boy a new one and stuck his right arm out...verdict penalty.

As for Dicoh...If it was at the other end would we want a penalty..answer Yes. both were penalties IMHO.

As for Mixu he can GTF. Scott won the ball fair and square and the killie no 2 jumped right into him. Mixu caused the bother cos his laddies pussied out of the challenge endof.

I've now seen a replay of the Killie penalty several times, and to me it clearly was NOT a penalty, Dickoh definitely gets the ball, the striker doesn't look as if he even touched the ball at all. Dickoh might well have been sent off for the reaction after though. Totally agree about Mixu though.

***lucky*** · 13-02-2011 07:25 PM

Sodje's goal was fine.

deeks was a soft pen but made up for the non pen when sodje was barged away from the ball.

Killie was never a pen as you can see from Dickho reaction calling their player a diver

Scott won the ball fair and square the Killie player was late.

Mixup caused a barney over nothing.

Mixup should also look at his comments in to the media after the game and retracted them and apologise.

**--------** · 13-02-2011 07:32 PM

Originally Posted by Aldo

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never a foul for Sodje's goal, the killie boy fell over his own legs.

As for the penalties, Deek ripped the Killie boy a new one and stuck his right arm out...verdict penalty.

As for Dicoh...If it was at the other end would we want a penalty..answer Yes. both were penalties IMHO.

As for Mixu he can GTF. Scott won the ball fair and square and the killie no 2 jumped right into him. Mixu caused the bother cos his laddies pussied out of the challenge endof.

Both Paatelainen and the Killie number 8 had their hands raised to Scott.

Murray, tbf, didn't look as if he had any intention of acting as peacemaker - Sissoku may have done him a favour by steering him out of the melee. It looks to me as if it would all have settled down with a bit of help from the ref if MP had kept his mouth shut and his hands to himself.

Looking at this video and the other one of the players leaving the pitch, Ian seems to be moving awkwardly - stiffness in his lower back? Maybe the 2-match ban'll let him get some physio in. Doesn't look an entirely well laddie to me.

**hibsbollah** · 13-02-2011 07:35 PM

Watched it a couple of times and the only conceivable compaint he could have is the Riordan pen is a bit soft, could have gone either way. The Scott challenge was excellent, he clearly got the ball, and Mixu was a complete cock. Good to see Murray telling him to GTF.

**~~PaulSmith~~** · 13-02-2011 07:41 PM

Originally Posted by 2468

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Kilmarnock pen and Dickoh red card both clearly wrong. Fortunately didn't affect the result but Hibs should appeal the sending off.

You cannot appeal this offence.

Removed · 13-02-2011 07:43 PM

Originally Posted by PaulSmith

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You cannot appeal this offence.

Really. Why not?

**TheBall'sRound** · 13-02-2011 08:37 PM

Have to say, I thought the commitment to dive by the Killie player was top notch. Reminded me of something....

***KeithTheHibby*** · 13-02-2011 08:37 PM

Originally Posted by 65bd

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Really. Why not?

You can only appeal violent conduct I think. Rediculous but true.

**Sas_The_Hibby** · 13-02-2011 08:50 PM

Originally Posted by lucky

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Sodje's goal was fine.

deeks was a soft pen but made up for the non pen when sodje was barged away from the ball.

Killie was never a pen as you can see from Dickho reaction calling their player a diver
Scott won the ball fair and square the Killie player was late.

Mixup caused a barney over nothing.

Mixup should also look at his comments in to the media after the game and retracted them and apologise.

If only life were that simple!

**The Harp Awakes** · 13-02-2011 09:02 PM

Mixu has made a complete erse of himself both after the Scott tackle but also in his biased and clearly wrong after match comments on Killie being on the end of bad decisions.

Clearly not a foul in the lead up to Hibs 1st goal & Clearly not a penalty for Killie. Hibs penalty was not clear cut but most refs would have given it IMO.

By the way, what was Scott booked for? He put in a hard but clean tackle then got pushed about by 3 Killie players but didn't retailiate.

Removed · 13-02-2011 09:02 PM

Originally Posted by KeithTheHibby

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You can only appeal violent conduct I think. Rediculous but true.

Just been searching th SFA website but can't find anything that explains the process/rules

**Westie1875** · 13-02-2011 09:09 PM

Originally Posted by KeithTheHibby

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You can only appeal violent conduct I think. Rediculous but true.

I'm sure we appealed a red card Boozy received against the huns a few years ago for a last man challenge in which Boyd clearly dived (can't see how it would have been given for violent conduct), in fact I'm pretty sure the decision was ridiculously upheld because the ref that day refused to admit he had made a mistake.

**DaveF** · 13-02-2011 09:23 PM

Originally Posted by Westie1875

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'm sure we appealed a red card Boozy received against the huns a few years ago for a last man challenge in which Boyd clearly dived (can't see how it would have been given for violent conduct), in fact I'm pretty sure the decision was ridiculously upheld because the ref that day refused to admit he had made a mistake.

Correct http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...an/6614609.stm

Charlie Richmond the referee

**Sir David Gray** · 13-02-2011 09:25 PM

We can definitely appeal the red card.

A club can appeal a red card in the case of mistaken identity and wrongful dismissal and that includes cases of denying a goalscoring opportunity, which was the reason for Dickoh's sending off.

However, this appeal can only be heard in "very exceptional circumstances".

http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/resource...visions%29.pdf

Thread: Hibs v Killie - BBC Highlights

Thread Tools

Display

Hibs v Killie - BBC Highlights

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions