Well, although i said yesterday it was never a penalty, this has just been confirmed after watching it on 'goals on Sunday' great tackle and he clearly takes the ball and then the Killie players throws himself to the deck, absolutely shocking decision by the linesman who would have had the perfect view and should be taken to task for making such a big decision and getting it catastrophically wrong!!!
I am guessing he was sent off for telliong the boy he was a cheat!!!
Results 1 to 30 of 33
Thread: THE penalty
-
13-02-2011 11:06 AM #1
THE penalty
-
13-02-2011 11:08 AM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Call me cynical and paranoid if you like, but Derek Adams had one appeal upheld and another suspension quashed without a hearing by the SFA this week - could this be a case of the Referees' Revenge?
-
13-02-2011 11:10 AM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:15 AM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Thats the big thing, Killie get an equaliser, we drop two points and we then have to got to St Mirren without Murray and Dickoh and St Mirren breathing down our neck with a game in hand and only one point behind, still to close for comfort and we dont have Dickoh!!!
-
13-02-2011 11:20 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
At the time i thought the ref had a shocker but looking back we did seem to benefit from the big decisions so i think it's more the way refs referee games that irritates me rather than the decisions they make, this nonsense of stopping games for ages to talk to players really winds me up, how long does it to say..."next foul your booked?" or tell them what theyve done then show them a yellow card?
-
13-02-2011 11:20 AM #6
Sorry guys, this is nonsense.
Player dives, referee (or linesman in this case) gets conned, foul awarded. Happens in every game.
Derek Riordan went down like he had been shot, yet jumped up without treatment as soon as the penalty was awarded.
Referees revenge? Oh please!
-
13-02-2011 11:21 AM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:22 AM #8RemovedLeft by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:23 AM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
GOTCHA!
-
13-02-2011 11:28 AM #10
Just seen all the key moments again on ESPN and Goals on sunday. Sodjie goal was perfectly good to me. Minimal if any contact made (and great finish big man). Soft penalty for us as he does put his arm out but very little contact. The Killie penalty was a good tackle by Dickoh as he clearly gets the ball and the Killie players dives to the ground. Dickoh was very unlucky to be sent off but if the ref deems it a penalty then he had no choice. Mixu is moaning but all I can say is
-
13-02-2011 11:29 AM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I've watched it several times.
The defender's had his back to Deek who had lost the ball. His elbow just caught him in the coupon.
Soft penalty. I wouldn't have given it. (to anyone other than Hibs )
-
13-02-2011 11:29 AM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:31 AM #13This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Whatever else happened in the game doesnt matter one iota as i am talking about the penalty against us, im not discussing Riordans as i havent seen a good eneough angle of it yet, im discussing something that i saw yesterday and was confirmed by TV this morning.
Nothing about linesman getting conned as he had a clear view, an offical is only conned if his view is blocked and the player dives, this case there was no obstruction between offical and incident, its black and white and official should be asked to explain it.
-
-
13-02-2011 11:34 AM #15RemovedLeft by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by Removed; 13-02-2011 at 11:36 AM.
-
13-02-2011 11:36 AM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:37 AM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Why?
-
13-02-2011 11:41 AM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:42 AM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Baically the appeal will stand as he did grab the player and i dint think they would take into consideration that the penalty shoudlnt have been given.
-
13-02-2011 11:46 AM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Although baffled the opposition team were shouting for a penalty, what is the world coming to.
-
13-02-2011 11:48 AM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:51 AM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:57 AM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-02-2011 11:57 AM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by PC Stamp; 13-02-2011 at 12:03 PM.
-
13-02-2011 11:59 AM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Still not convinced officials should listen to the people behind, them, in front of them, next to them - if he sees a foul: he gives a foul (or a penalty) - they make mistakes, that's football - I watched on Hibs TV, I can't tell you if it was or wasn't a penalty, I'm not even sure about the Riordan one, and I've repeatedly watched it to see: the RA just has what he sees at that particular moment, not an easy job at times, I feel
-
13-02-2011 12:05 PM #26
The linesman gave the penalty for the tackle, he ran to the corner flag straight after the tackle. Any appeal if we make one, will imo be focusing on the challenge for the penalty.
-
13-02-2011 12:08 PM #27This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
My understanding is that DA's ban was initially increased because he was again accused of abusing a referee within 6 months of his first ban. The appeals system kept increasing his ban. The SFL then backed down when Hibs got involved.
The referees aren't happy with the lack of backing from the authorities.
As I understand it, DA, and his father, George who is the CEO? at Ross County, have bad reputations when it comes to their behaviour towards referees.
They may be born again Christian's but that doesn't seem to be their prime motivation when it comes to football.
Maybe that's why you used the word "pray"?
-
13-02-2011 12:15 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I am one of those who dont always look through green tinted specs and voiced my uncertaintly on Hibs penalty and thought it looked soft, i was at the other end of the stadium however.
-
13-02-2011 01:06 PM #29
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Posts
- 635
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I didn't see him do anything
-
13-02-2011 01:09 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks